Dataset Information

Assessing experienced tranquillity through natural language processing and landscape ecology measures

ABSTRACT:

Context

Identifying tranquil areas is important for landscape planning and policy-making. Research demonstrated discrepancies between modelled potential tranquil areas and where people experience tranquillity based on field surveys. Because surveys are resource-intensive, user-generated text data offers potential for extracting where people experience tranquillity.

Objectives

We explore and model the relationship between landscape ecological measures and experienced tranquillity extracted from user-generated text descriptions.

Methods

Georeferenced, user-generated landscape descriptions from Geograph.UK were filtered using keywords related to tranquillity. We stratify resulting tranquil locations according to dominant land cover and quantify the influence of landscape characteristics including diversity and naturalness on explaining the presence of tranquillity. Finally, we apply natural language processing to identify terms linked to tranquillity keywords and compare the similarity of these terms across land cover classes.

Results

Evaluation of potential keywords yielded six keywords associated with experienced tranquillity, resulting in 15,350 extracted tranquillity descriptions. The two most common land cover classes associated with tranquillity were arable and horticulture, and improved grassland, followed by urban and suburban. In the logistic regression model across all land cover classes, freshwater, elevation and naturalness were positive predictors of tranquillity. Built-up area was a negative predictor. Descriptions of tranquillity were most similar between improved grassland and arable and horticulture, and most dissimilar between arable and horticulture and urban.

Conclusions

This study highlights the potential of applying natural language processing to extract experienced tranquillity from text, and demonstrates links between landscape ecological measures and tranquillity as a perceived landscape quality.

Supplementary information

The online version of this article (10.1007/s10980-020-01181-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

SUBMITTER: Wartmann F

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8550761 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceCase reports that externalize expert diagnostic reasoning are utilized for clinical reasoning instruction but are difficult to search based on symptoms, final diagnosis, or differential diagnosis construction. Computational approaches that uncover how experienced diagnosticians analyze the medical information in a case as they formulate a differential diagnosis can guide educational uses of case reports.ObjectiveTo develop a "reasoning-encoded" case database for advanced clinical reasoning instruction by applying natural language processing (NLP), a sub-field of artificial intelligence, to a large case report library.DesignWe collected 2525 cases from the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) Clinical Pathological Conference (CPC) from 1965 to 2020 and used NLP to analyze the medical terminology in each case to derive unbiased (not prespecified) categories of analysis used by the clinical discussant. We then analyzed and mapped the degree of category overlap between cases.ResultsOur NLP algorithms identified clinically relevant categories that reflected the relationships between medical terms (which included symptoms, signs, test results, pathophysiology, and diagnoses). NLP extracted 43,291 symptoms across 2525 cases and physician-annotated 6532 diagnoses (both primary and related diagnoses). Our unsupervised learning computational approach identified 12 categories of medical terms that characterized the differential diagnosis discussions within individual cases. We used these categories to derive a measure of differential diagnosis similarity between cases and developed a website ( universeofcpc.com ) to allow visualization and exploration of 55 years of NEJM CPC case series.ConclusionsApplying NLP to curated instances of diagnostic reasoning can provide insight into how expert clinicians correlate and coordinate disease categories and processes when creating a differential diagnosis. Our reasoning-encoded CPC case database can be used by clinician-educators to design a case-based curriculum and by physicians to direct their lifelong learning efforts.

Project description:BackgroundClinical natural language processing (cNLP) systems are of crucial importance due to their increasing capability in extracting clinically important information from free text contained in electronic health records (EHRs). The conversion of a nonstructured representation of a patient's clinical history into a structured format enables medical doctors to generate clinical knowledge at a level that was not possible before. Finally, the interpretation of the insights gained provided by cNLP systems has a great potential in driving decisions about clinical practice. However, carrying out robust evaluations of those cNLP systems is a complex task that is hindered by a lack of standard guidance on how to systematically approach them.ObjectiveOur objective was to offer natural language processing (NLP) experts a methodology for the evaluation of cNLP systems to assist them in carrying out this task. By following the proposed phases, the robustness and representativeness of the performance metrics of their own cNLP systems can be assured.MethodsThe proposed evaluation methodology comprised five phases: (1) the definition of the target population, (2) the statistical document collection, (3) the design of the annotation guidelines and annotation project, (4) the external annotations, and (5) the cNLP system performance evaluation. We presented the application of all phases to evaluate the performance of a cNLP system called "EHRead Technology" (developed by Savana, an international medical company), applied in a study on patients with asthma. As part of the evaluation methodology, we introduced the Sample Size Calculator for Evaluations (SLiCE), a software tool that calculates the number of documents needed to achieve a statistically useful and resourceful gold standard.ResultsThe application of the proposed evaluation methodology on a real use-case study of patients with asthma revealed the benefit of the different phases for cNLP system evaluations. By using SLiCE to adjust the number of documents needed, a meaningful and resourceful gold standard was created. In the presented use-case, using as little as 519 EHRs, it was possible to evaluate the performance of the cNLP system and obtain performance metrics for the primary variable within the expected CIs.ConclusionsWe showed that our evaluation methodology can offer guidance to NLP experts on how to approach the evaluation of their cNLP systems. By following the five phases, NLP experts can assure the robustness of their evaluation and avoid unnecessary investment of human and financial resources. Besides the theoretical guidance, we offer SLiCE as an easy-to-use, open-source Python library.