Dataset Information

The Majority of Complaints About Orthopedic Sports Surgeons on Yelp Are Nonclinical

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To examine and characterize extremely negative Yelp reviews of orthopedic sports surgeons in the United States.

Methods

A search for reviews was performed using the keywords “Orthopedic Sports Medicine” on Yelp.com for 8 major metropolitan areas. Single-star reviews were isolated for analysis, and individual complaints were then categorized as clinical or nonclinical. The reviews were classified as surgical or nonsurgical.

Results

A total of 11,033 reviews were surveyed. Of these, 1,045 (9.5%) were identified as 1-star, and 289 were ultimately included in the study. These reviews encompassed 566 total complaints, 133 (23%) of which were clinical, and 433 (77%) of which were nonclinical in nature. The most common clinical complaints concerned complications (32 complaints; 6%), misdiagnosis (29 complaints; 5%), and uncontrolled pain (21 complaints; 4%). The most common nonclinical complaints concerned physicians’ bedside manner (120 complaints; 21%), unprofessional staff (98 complaints; 17%), and finances (78 complaints; 14%). Patients who had undergone surgery wrote 47 reviews that resulted in 114 complaints (20.5% of total complaints), whereas nonsurgical patients were responsible for 242 reviews and a total of 452 complaints (81.3% of total complaints). The difference in the number of complaints by patients after surgery and patients without surgery was statistically significant (P < 0.05) for all categories except for uncontrolled pain, delay in care, bedside manner of midlevel staff, and facilities.

Conclusion

Our study of extremely negative Yelp reviews found that 77% of negative complaints were nonclinical in nature. The most common clinical complaints were complications, misdiagnoses and uncontrolled pain. Only 16% of 1-star reviews were from surgical patients.

Clinical Relevance

Patients use online review platforms when choosing surgeons. A comprehensive understanding of factors affecting patient satisfaction and dissatisfaction is needed. The results of our study could be used to guide future quality-improvement measures and to assist surgeons in maintaining favorable online reputations.

SUBMITTER: Pollock J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8551418 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundDigital media is an effective tool to enhance brand recognition and is currently referenced by more than 40% of orthopedic patients when selecting a physician. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of social media among foot and ankle (F&A) orthopedic surgeons, and the impact of that social media presence on scores of a physician-rated website (PRW).MethodsRandomly selected F&A orthopedic surgeons from all major geographical locations across the United States were identified using the AAOS.org website. Internet searches were then performed using the physician's name and the respective social media platform. A comprehensive social media use index (SMI) was created for each surgeon using a scoring system based on social media platform use. The use of individual platforms and SMI was compared to the F&A surgeon's Healthgrades scores. Descriptive statistics, unpaired Student t tests, and linear regression were used to assess the effect of social media on the PRW scores.ResultsA total of 123 board-certified F&A orthopedic surgeons were included in our study demonstrating varying social media use: Facebook (48.8%), Twitter (15.4%), YouTube (23.6%), LinkedIn (47.9%), personal website (24.4%), group website (52.9%), and Instagram (0%). The mean SMI was 2.4 ± 1.6 (range 0-7). Surgeons who used a Facebook page were older, whereas those using a group website were younger (P < .05). F&A orthopedic surgeons with a YouTube page had statistically higher Healthgrades scores compared to those without (P < .05).ConclusionF&A orthopedic surgeons underused social media platforms in their clinical practice. Among all the platforms studied, a YouTube page was the most impactful social media platform on Healthgrades scores for F&A orthopedic surgeons. Given these findings, we recommend that physicians closely monitor their digital identity and maintain a diverse social media presence including a YouTube page to promote their clinical practice.Level of evidenceLevel IV.

Project description:BackgroundIn older adults facing knee arthroplasty, the ability to resume downhill skiing postoperatively is unclear. This study aimed to determine the perspectives of Alberta orthopedic surgeons and senior residents regarding downhill skiing after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).MethodsIn May 2019, a Web-based survey was sent through the Alberta Orthopaedic Society to poll orthopedic surgeons performing arthroplasty and senior orthopedic residents (postgraduate year 4 or 5) in Alberta regarding the permissibility of downhill skiing after TKA or UKA. The survey also elicited information regarding under which conditions or restrictions, if any, surgeons would allow patients to return to downhill skiing, whether these recommendations were evidence based, and whether surgeons had seen complications from downhill skiing in their patients who had undergone knee arthroplasty.ResultsOf the 41 respondents, 21 (51%) were full-time fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons, 15 (37%) were specialists with some arthroplasty in their practice, and 5 (12%) were orthopedic residents. Ten of 40 respondents (25%) would allow unrestricted downhill skiing after TKA, and 1 (2%) would not allow any skiing at all. The remaining 29 (72%) indicated that they might allow downhill skiing under specific conditions, with the top 3 being limitations on speed and intensity (29 [71%]), return of full range of motion and strength in the operative knee (26 [63%]), and years of downhill ski experience (23 [56%]). Fourteen respondents (34%) would allow unrestricted downhill skiing after UKA, and 27 (66%) would allow skiing with the same top 3 conditions as for TKA. Thirty-two respondents (78%) reported that their decisions were not evidence based, and 35 (85%) had never seen complications from downhill skiing after TKA or UKA.ConclusionAlberta orthopedic surgeons and senior residents are cautious regarding skiing after knee arthroplasty. The majority reported that their restrictions were not evidence based, which indicates the need for further investigation to develop an approach for surgeons to consistently and safely address return to downhill skiing after TKA or UKA.

Project description:Background:The use of fluoroscopically-guided interventional (FGI) procedures by orthopedic surgeons has been increasing. This study aimed to investigate the occupational radiation exposure among orthopedic surgeons in South Korea. Methods:A nationwide survey of orthopedic surgeons was conducted in South Korea in October 2017. The dosimetry data of the participants were obtained from the National Dosimetry Registry. The orthopedic surgeons were categorized by job specialty [spine or trauma specialists, other orthopedic specialists, and residents], and descriptive statistics for the demographics and work-related characteristics were presented. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors for the orthopedic surgeons who were not linked with the dosimetry data. Results:Among the total participants (n?=?513), 40.5% of the orthopedic surgeons spent more than 50% of their time working with the FGI procedures when compared with their overall work. The average frequency of the FGI procedures among the orthopedic surgeons was 12.3?days per month. Less than 30% of the participants were regularly provided with radiation monitoring badges. The proportion of subjects who always wore lead aprons and thyroid shields were 52 and 29%, respectively. The residents group experienced more unfavorable working conditions of radiation exposure than the other specialists. The dosimetry data were not significantly linked among the residents (odds ratio [OR] 2.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-3.95) and orthopedic surgeons working at small hospitals (OR 4.76, 95% CI 1.05-21.51). Conclusions:Although orthopedic surgeons often performed FGI procedures, they wore protective gear less frequently, and a large proportion of orthopedic surgeons were not monitored by the national radiation dosimetry system. As the number of radiation procedures performed by the orthopedic surgeons increases, more intensive approaches are needed to reduce radiation exposure, especially for spine and trauma surgeons.