Dataset Information

Efficacy of Chemotherapy in Survival of Stage I Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To identify whether chemoradiotherapy improves survival of stage I nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

Materials and methods

NPC patients were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2010 and 2015. Pathologically confirmed stage T1N0M0 (the 7^th edition AJCC) were investigated. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were compared between the radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy groups using the Kaplan-Meier method and propensity score matching (PSM) analyses.

Results

This study included 91 (40.27%) patients in the chemoradiotherapy group and 135 (59.73%) patients in the radiotherapy group. Before PSM, chemoradiotherapy was associated with worse 3-year OS (74.31 vs 87.23%; P = 0.025) and 5-year OS (64.28 vs 83.12%; P = 0.001) compared to those associated with radiotherapy. Similarly, chemoradiotherapy showed worse 3-year CSS (87.01 vs 96.97%; P = 0.028) and 5-year CSS (80.39 vs. 96.97%; P = 0.002) than those of radiotherapy. After PSM, chemoradiotherapy revealed worse 5-year OS (63.10 vs. 82.49%; P = 0.031) and CSS (80.95 vs. 93.70%; P = 0.016) than radiotherapy. The multivariate regression analysis revealed that chemoradiotherapy was an independent risk prognostic factor for OS and CSS before and after PSM.

Conclusion

Radiotherapy alone is recommended for stage I NPC patients.

SUBMITTER: Ma JL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8551620 | biostudies-literature | 2021

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Efficacy of Chemotherapy in Survival of Stage I Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Ma Jia-Lin JL Huang Shi-Ting ST Jiang Yan-Ming YM Pan Xin-Bin XB

Frontiers in oncology 20211014

<h4>Purpose</h4>To identify whether chemoradiotherapy improves survival of stage I nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).<h4>Materials and methods</h4>NPC patients were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2010 and 2015. Pathologically confirmed stage T1N0M0 (the 7<sup>th</sup> edition AJCC) were investigated. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were compared between the radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy groups using the Kaplan-Meier meth ...[more]

PMID: 34722284

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeThe value of adding induction chemotherapy to chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) remains controversial, yet high-risk patients with LA-NPC have poor outcomes after chemoradiotherapy. We aimed to assess the survival benefits of induction chemotherapy in stage IVa-b NPC.Patients and methodsA total of 602 patients with stage IVa-b NPC treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and concurrent chemotherapy with or without induction chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test and Cox regression analysis.ResultsIn univariate analysis, 5-year OS was 83.2% for induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy and 74.8% for concurrent chemotherapy alone, corresponding to an absolute risk reduction of 8.4% (P = 0.022). Compared to concurrent chemotherapy alone, addition of induction chemotherapy improved 5-year DMFS (83.2% vs. 74.4%, P = 0.018) but not 5-year LRFS (83.7% vs. 83.0%, P = 0.848) or PFS (71.9% vs. 66.0%, P = 0.12). Age, T category, N category, chemotherapy strategy and clinical stage were associated with 5-year OS (P = 0.017, P = 0.031, P = 0.007, P = 0.022, P = 0.001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy was an independent favorable prognostic factor for OS (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.43-0.90, P = 0.012) and DMFS (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.38-0.83, P = 0.004). In subgroup analysis, induction chemotherapy significantly improved 5-year DMFS in stage IVa (86.8% vs. 77.3%, P = 0.008), but provided no significant benefit in stage IVb.ConclusionsIn patients with stage IVa-b NPC treated with IMRT, addition of induction chemotherapy to concurrent chemotherapy significantly improved 5-year OS and 5-year DMFS. This study provides a basis for selection of high risk patients in future clinical therapeutic trials.

Project description:BackgroundTo estimate the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) in stage T3-4N1 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).MethodsData on stage T3-4N1 NPC patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with or without NCT at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between January 2006 and December 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was carried out to balance prognostic factors in NCT followed by CCRT (NCT + CCRT) group and CCRT group in a 1:1 ratio. Survival outcomes of matched patients in the two groups were compared, and prognostic factors were identified using Cox regression model.ResultsA total of 282 patients were involved in this study, with 136 of NCT + CCRT group and 146 of CCRT group. After PSM, 85 pairs of patients were selected. There were no significant differences in 5-year overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) between NCT + CCRT group and CCRT group (81.0% vs. 77.5%, P = 0.750; 85.8% vs. 88.1%, P = 0.495; 92.5% vs. 93.9%, P = 0.759; 81.0% vs.77.5%, P = 0.919, respectively). Multivariate analysis found that smoking history (P = 0.044) and T classification (P = 0.027) were independent prognostic factors for OS, lymph node diameter (P = 0.032) was independent prognostic factor for LRFS, positive pretreatment lymph node condition (PLNC), which was defined as the lymph node necrosis or confluent, was independent prognostic factor for DRFS (P = 0.007), and RFS (P = 0.009). Lower 5-year OS (82.7% vs. 94.1%, P = 0.014), DRFS (79.3% vs. 96.2%, P = 0.003), and RFS (62.4% vs. 86.8%, P = 0.001) were found in positive PLNC group compared with negative PLNC group. In terms of toxicities, the incidences of acute hematological Grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were higher in NCT + CCRT group compared with CCRT group (P < 0.05), while no significant difference was observed in the rates of non-hematological Grade 3-4 AEs between these two groups (P > 0.05).ConclusionsAdditional NCT is not associated with improved survival outcomes for patients with stage T3-4N1 NPC, but bring increased hematological Grade 3-4 AEs. PLNC is independent prognostic factor in stage T3-4N1 NPC, with positive PLNC correlating with poor survival outcomes.

Project description:Purpose: We aimed to determine whether adding induction chemotherapy (IC) to concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) improved outcomes in each stage of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC). Methods: From 2007 to 2013, we retrospectively collected 259 histopathologically identified adult LANPC patients from two campuses in south Taiwan. Among the 238 eligibly treated cases, 156 patients received CCRT (CCRT group) upfront and 82 received IC followed by CCRT (IC group). Of these patients, 130 were stage III (92 patients that received CCRT and 38 that received IC adding CCRT) and 108 were stage IV (76 CCRT and 32 IC adding CCRT). Most chemotherapy regimens for IC are composed of cisplatin (P), 5-fluorouracil (F), and ifosfamide (I), while concurrent chemotherapy (CC) was essentially cisplatin-based. For CCRT as the upfront treatment, a P or PF regimen was usually used in CC. Survival outcomes were accessed with a Kaplan-Meier estimate and a p-value by log-rank test to compare the survival distributions of IC added to CCRT or CCRT as the upfront treatment in all LANPC stage III and LANPC IV patients. The failure free survival (FFS), overall survival (OS), local relapse free survival (LRFS), regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), first failure site, and other prognostic factors were analyzed. Results: The median follow-up time of all treated LANPC patients was 59 months. For all LANPC patients, there was a significant difference only in the DMFS favoring IC group (91.5% vs 79.4%, p=0.013). In the subgroup study, for the stage III group, there was no significant difference between the groups for overall OS (IC group 71.3% vs CCRT group 78.7%), FFS (71.5% vs 62.4%) and RRFS (91.9% vs 90.9%). However, inferior LRLS (71.7% vs 91.5%; p = 0.03) was noted for the IC group. In contrast, for stage IV, there were significantly longer OS (75.8% vs 52.6%), FFS (66.8% vs 46.8%), and DMFS (86.0% vs 69.6%; p = 0.02, p = 0.04, and p = 0.03, respectively) rates in the IC group. Conclusion: Adding PIF-based IC to CCRT for the LANPC patients resulted in better outcomes for stage IV patients, but not for stage III patients. A future properly designed study should stratify enough LANPC cases under the structure of the AJCC stage grouping system to determine which subgroups truly benefit from adding IC to CCRT.

Dataset Information

Efficacy of Chemotherapy in Survival of Stage I Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Purpose

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Efficacy of Chemotherapy in Survival of Stage I Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets