Dataset Information

Abemaciclib in Combination With Pembrolizumab for Stage IV KRAS-Mutant or Squamous NSCLC: A Phase 1b Study

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Abemaciclib is an oral, selective small-molecule CDK 4 and 6 inhibitor. In preclinical models, abemaciclib synergized with programmed cell death protein-1 blockade to enhance antitumor efficacy. Here, we report the safety and anticancer activity of abemaciclib plus pembrolizumab in two cohorts with NSCLC.

Methods

This nonrandomized, open-label, phase 1b study included patients with previously untreated programmed death-ligand 1–positive, KRAS-mutant nonsquamous metastatic NSCLC (cohort A); squamous NSCLC after one previous platinum-containing chemotherapy regimen for metastatic disease (cohort B); and two breast cancer cohorts (disclosed separately). Patients received 150 mg abemaciclib every 12 hours plus 200 mg pembrolizumab intravenously on day 1 every 21 days. The primary objective was safety; secondary objectives included objective response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Clinical Trial Number: NCT02779751.

Results

Each cohort enrolled 25 patients. Grades greater than or equal to 3 treatment-emergent adverse events in cohorts A and B were reported by 20 (80%) and 19 patients (76%), respectively. Six patients in cohort A (24.0%) and two patients in cohort B (8.0%) had a confirmed partial response; disease control rate was 56% and 64%, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 7.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6–not estimable) and 3.3 months (95% CI: 1.4–5.2); median overall survival was 27.8 months (95% CI: 9.9–not estimable) and 6.0 months (95% CI: 3.7–13.1) in cohorts A and B, respectively.

Conclusions

The combination of abemaciclib and pembrolizumab in stage IV NSCLC resulted in greater toxicity compared with that previously reported for each individual treatment. Risk-benefit profile does not warrant further evaluation of the combination in this population.

SUBMITTER: Pujol J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8551846 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Objective To compare the cost-effectiveness of the combination of pembrolizumab and chemotherapy (Pembro+Chemo) versus pembrolizumab monotherapy (Pembro) as the first-line treatment for metastatic non-squamous and squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with PD-L1expression ≥50%, respectively, from a US health care perspective. Material and Methods A comprehensive Makrov model were designed to compare the health costs and outcomes associated with first-line Pembro+Chemo and first-line Pembro over a 20-years time horizon. Health states consisted of three main states: progression-free survival (PFS), progressive disease (PD) and death, among which the PFS health state was divided into two substates: PFS while receiving first-line therapy and PFS with discontinued first-line therapy. Two scenario analyses were performed to explore satisfactory long-term survival modeling. Results In base case analysis, for non-squamous NSCLC patients, Pembro+Chemo was associated with a significantly longer life expectancy [3.24 vs 2.16 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs)] and a substantially greater healthcare cost ($341,237 vs $159,055) compared with Pembro, resulting in an ICER of $169,335/QALY; for squamous NSCLC patients, Pembro+Chemo was associated with a slightly extended life expectancy of 0.22 QALYs and a marginal incremental cost of $3,449 compared with Pembro, resulting in an ICER of $15,613/QALY. Our results were particularly sensitive to parameters that determine QALYs. The first scenario analysis yielded lower ICERs than our base case results. The second scenario analysis founded Pembro+Chemo was dominated by Pembro. Conclusion For metastatic non-squamous NSCLC patients with PD-L1 expression ≥50%, first-line Pembro+Chemo was not cost-effective when compared with first-line Pembro. In contrast, for the squamous NSCLC patient population, our results supported the first-line Pembro+Chemo as a cost-effective treatment. Although there are multiple approaches that are used for extrapolating long-term survival, the optimal method has yet to be determined.

Project description:IntroductionPembrolizumab plus chemotherapy significantly improved survival outcomes versus placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated metastatic squamous NSCLC in the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 KEYNOTE-407 study. We present the results of Chinese patients enrolled in the KEYNOTE-407 global and China extension studies.MethodsPatients enrolled from mainland China in the KEYNOTE-407 global (NCT02775435) and China extension studies (NCT03875092) were randomized 1:1 to 35 cycles of pembrolizumab or placebo plus four cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel. Dual primary end points were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) (based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 by blinded independent central review).ResultsA total of 125 patients were randomized (pembrolizumab-chemotherapy, n = 65; placebo-chemotherapy, n = 60). As of September 30, 2020, median (range) study follow-up was 28.1 (25.1‒40.9) months. Pembrolizumab-chemotherapy improved OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28-0.70) and PFS (HR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.24-0.52) versus placebo-chemotherapy. Two-year OS and PFS rates for pembrolizumab-chemotherapy versus placebo-chemotherapy were 56.9% versus 31.7% and 24.2% versus 3.3%, respectively. Treatment-related grade 3 to 5 adverse events occurred in 81.5% and 81.7%, respectively. Relative to baseline, pembrolizumab-chemotherapy improved global health status/quality of life scores at week 18 versus placebo-chemotherapy (difference in least squares means = 7.6, 95% CI: 1.5-13.7) and prolonged time to deterioration in cough, chest pain, or dyspnea (HR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.28-0.89).ConclusionsPembrolizumab-chemotherapy prolonged survival versus placebo-chemotherapy with manageable toxicity and preserved or improved health-related quality of life in Chinese patients with metastatic squamous NSCLC. These findings support pembrolizumab-chemotherapy as first-line therapy in this population.

Project description:Background: Several studies suggest that patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC fail to benefit from standard systemic therapies and do not respond to EGFR inhibitors. Most recently, KRAS 12c data suggest specific treatment for improving ORR and OS. There is a clear need for therapies specifically developed for these patients. Moreover, data that might be suggestive of a response to specific therapies, such as BRCA1, are needed, and two mutations that were studied in other malignancies show more response to PARP inhibitors. Molecular profiling has the potential to identify other potential targets that may provide better treatment and novel targeted therapy for KRAS-mutated NSCLC. Methods: We purified RNA from archived tissues of patients with stage I and II NSCLC with wild-type (wt) and mutant (mt) KRAS tumors; paired normal tissue adjacent to the tumor from 20 and 17 patients, respectively, and assessed, using real-time reverse transcriptase−polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), the expression of four genes involved in DNA synthesis and repair, including thymidylate synthase (TS), BRCA1, ECCR1, RAP80, and the proto-oncogene SRC. Additionally, we assessed the expression of PD-L1 in mt KRAS tumors with immunohistochemistry using an antibody against PD-L1. Results: Our results show that in mtKRAS tumors, the level of expression of ERCC1, TS, and SRC was significantly increased in comparison to paired normal lung tissue (p ≤ 0.04). The expression of BRCA1 and RAP80 was similar in both mt KRAS tumors and paired normal tissue. Furthermore, the expression of BRCA1, TS, and SRC was significantly increased in wt KRAS tumors relative to their expression in the normal lung tissue (p < 0.044). The expression of ERCC1 and RAP80 was similar in wt KRAS tumors and paired normal tissue. Interestingly, SRC expression in mtKRAS tumors was decreased in comparison to wt KRAS tumors. Notably, there was an expression of PD-L1 in the tumor and stromal cells in a few (5 out of 20) mtKRAS tumors. Our results suggest that a greater ERCC1 expression in mt KRAS tumors might increase platinum resistance in this group of patients, whereas the greater expression of BRCA1 in wt KRAS tumor might be suggestive of the sensitivity of taxanes. Our data also suggest that the combination of an SRC inhibitor with a TS inhibitor, such as pemetrexed, might improve the outcome of patients with NSCLC and in particular, patients with wt KRAS tumors. PD-L1 expression in tumors, and especially stromal cells, suggests a better outcome. Conclusion: mt KRAS NSCLC patients might benefit from a treatment strategy that targets KRAS in combination with therapeutic agents based on pharmacogenomic markers, such as SRC and BRCA1. mtKRAS tumors are likely to be platinum-, taxane-, and pemetrexed-resistant, as well as having a low level of PD-L1 expression; thus, they are less likely to receive single-agent immunotherapy, such as pembrolizumab, as the first-line therapy. wt KRAS tumors with BRCA1 positivity tend to be sensitive to taxane therapy and, potentially, platinum. Our results suggest the need to develop targeted therapies for KRAS-mutant NSCLC or combine the targeting of oncogenic KRAS in addition to other therapeutic agents specific to the molecular profile of the tumor.