Roflumilast (Daliresp®) to reduce acute pulmonary events in fibrotic sarcoidosis: a multi-center, double blind, placebo controlled, randomized clinical trial
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background:
Fibrotic sarcoidosis patients often have acute events of increased cough and sputum production. We evaluated the impact of roflumilast in fibrotic sarcoidosis patients with repeated episodes of increased cough and sputum. Methods:
Sarcoidosis patients with pulmonary fibrosis and at least two acute episodes in the previous year were randomized to receive either roflumilast (ROF) or placebo (PLA) in a double blind, placebo controlled multi-center trial. Subjects were assessed initially and every three months for 12 months. At each visit, spirometry and health related quality of life questionnaires were completed. For each subject, the best forced expiratory volume at 1 second (FEV-1) was noted. Results:
Of the 38 subjects who enrolled in the study, 28 subjects (14 in each group) received at least three months of treatment and 10 in each arm completing all 12 months of study. During the treatment, patients treated with ROF were less likely to have visits in which the FEV-1 was less than 90% of the best FEV-1 (Odds ratio=0.34 (0.16 to 0.76 95% confidence interval, p=0.0073). At the end of treatment with ROF, patients had a significant improvement in their KSQ LUNG (Initial visit: 45.3 ± 6.89 (Mean ± S.D.); Last visit: 52.6± 7.91, p<0.05) with no change for PLA treated patients. Conclusion:
Patients treated with at least three months of roflumilast had fewer follow-up visits with an FEV-1 of less than 90% of best value. At the end of treatment, ROF treated patients had a better quality of life as assessed by KSQ LUNG. Clinical Trial Registration:
NCT01830959
SUBMITTER: Baughman R
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8552567 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Fatigue has been identified in more than one-half of patients with sarcoidosis. Although fatigue is not synonymous with impaired quality of life, most studies of sarcoidosis identify fatigue as a major cause of impaired quality of life.To test the hypothesis that stimulants may have a role in the treatment of fatigued sarcoidosis patients, even without objective evidence of daytime sleepiness.This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of sarcoidosis patients followed up in one sarcoidosis clinic Sarcoidosis patients with fatigue received either armodafinil or placebo with eight weeks of therapy for each arm and a two week washout period before crossover to the other treatment. Initial armodafinil dose was 150mg and increased to 250mg after four weeks. Patients underwent polysomnography and multiple sleep latency testing (MSLT) the following day. Patients with an apnea/hypopnea index <6/hour received either armodafinil or placebo. Polysomnography with MSLT was repeated after each treatment arm.Fifteen patients received the study drug. Fatigue was assessed using the Fatigue Assessment Scale (the lower the score, the less the fatigue) and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) (the higher the score, the less the fatigue). After eight weeks of therapy, there was a significant improvement in the Fatigue Assessment Scale during armodafinil treatment (median -4.5, range -20, 5) compared with placebo treatment (median 3.5, range -9, 14, P<0.05) and for the FACIT-F (armodafinil: median 9, range -12, 26 vs. placebo: median -5, range -17, 11, P<0.005). This improvement in fatigue was seen for both those with and without shortened sleep onset latency time during the MSLT.Armodafinil treatment led to a significant reduction in fatigue in sarcoidosis patients. This effect was seen even in patients who did not have excessive daytime somnolence.
| S-EPMC3678278 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Xerostomia is a symptom frequently present in patients with type 1 (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In the present trial, the activity of an artificial saliva (aldiamed® spray) in comparison to a placebo spray were used to evaluate the xerostomia and the saliva antioxidant capacity (SAT). Sixty patients of both genders with T1DM or T2DM were randomized into two groups of 30 subjects each. The experiment was a double-blind study approved by the Ethics Committee of the "G. d'Annunzio University" of Chieti and Pescara. Moreover, measurements of the stimulated saliva flow rate and the ultrasonography of the submandibular and parotid glands were performed at both the study time points. The results demonstrated statistically significant differences between the treatments in terms of the xerostomia average score. Specifically, the values were at baseline and after 30 days 2.9 ± 1.31 and 3.0 ± 1.44 and 1.4 ± 1.48 and 2.4 ± 0.99 for aldiamed® spray and the placebo, respectively. Meanwhile, no statistically significant differences were shown between the two groups for the other variables, such as the salivary flow rate, the antioxidant capacity of the saliva, and the ultrasonography of the major salivary glands.
| S-EPMC7408818 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPostkidney transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) affects cardiovascular, allograft, and recipient health. We tested whether early intervention with sitagliptin for hyperglycemia (blood glucose >200 mg/dL) within the first week of transplant and discontinued at 3 mo could prevent development of PTDM in patients without preexisting diabetes.MethodsThe primary efficacy objective was to improve 2-h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) by > 20 mg/dL at 3 mo posttransplant. The secondary efficacy objective was to prevent new onset PTDM, defined as a normal OGTT at 3 mo.ResultsSixty-one patients consented, and 50 patients were analyzed. The 3-mo 2-h OGTT (end of treatment) was 141.00 ± 62.44 mg/dL in the sitagliptin arm and 165.22 ± 72.03 mg/dL ( P = 0.218) in the placebo arm. The 6-mo 2-h OGTT (end of follow-up) was 174.38 ± 77.93 mg/dL in the sitagliptin arm and 171.86 ± 83.69 ng/dL ( P = 0.918) in the placebo arm. Mean intrapatient difference between 3- and 6-mo 2-h OGTT in the 3-mo period off study drug was 27.56 + 52.74 mg/dL in the sitagliptin arm and -0.14 + 45.80 mg/dL in the placebo arm ( P = 0.0692). At 3 mo, 61.54% of sitagliptin and 43.48% of placebo patients had a normal 2-h OGTT ( P = 0.2062), with the absolute risk reduction 18.06%. There were no differences in HbA1c at 3 or 6 mo between sitagliptin and placebo groups. Participants tolerated sitagliptin well.ConclusionsAlthough this study did not show a significant difference between groups, it can inform future studies in the use of sitagliptin in the very early posttransplant period.
| S-EPMC10125117 | biostudies-literature
Project description:OBJECTIVE:Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms, including inattention and over activity, occur in approximately one-third of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We describe the rate and duration of adverse events in a randomized controlled trial of atomoxetine (ATX) and parent training (PT) for ADHD symptoms and noncompliance in children with ASD. METHODS:We conducted a 10-week, double-blind, 2?×?2 trial of ATX and PT with 128 children (ages 5-14) randomized to ATX alone, ATX+PT, placebo+PT, or placebo alone. For 6 weeks, ATX (or placebo) doses were clinically adjusted to a maximum of 1.8?mg/(kg·day) and maintained for an additional 4 weeks. An average of seven PT sessions were conducted in the two PT arms. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed through parent ratings of common symptoms on a seven-point Likert severity scale and through direct interviews with study medical staff. RESULTS:ATX was associated with decreased appetite and fatigue, but was otherwise well tolerated. Most reported AEs lasted 4 weeks or less. Unlike reports with typically developing (TD) children, there were no concerns with QTc changes or suicidal ideation. CONCLUSIONS:This study extends the findings of previous studies of ATX in ASD by documenting that the type of AEs was similar to that of TD children, with no significant safety concerns.
| S-EPMC5651962 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Beneficial effects of blackcurrant supplementation on bone metabolism in mice has recently been demonstrated, but no studies are available in humans. The current study aimed to examine the dose-dependent effects of blackcurrant in preventing bone loss and the underlying mechanisms of action in adult women. Forty peri- and early postmenopausal women were randomly assigned into one of three treatment groups for 6 months: (1) a placebo (control group, n = 13); (2) 392 mg/day of blackcurrant powder (low blackcurrant, BC, group, n = 16); and (3) 784 mg/day of blackcurrant powder (high BC group, n = 11). The significance of differences in outcome variables was tested by repeated-measures ANOVA with treatment and time as between- and within-subject factors, respectively. Overall, blackcurrant supplementation decreased the loss of whole-body bone mineral density (BMD) compared to the control group (p < 0.05), though the improvement of whole-body BMD remained significant only in the high BC group (p < 0.05). Blackcurrant supplementation also led to a significant increase in serum amino-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen (P1NP), a marker of bone formation (p < 0.05). These findings suggest that daily consumption of 784 mg of blackcurrant powder for six months mitigates the risk of postmenopausal bone loss, potentially through enhancing bone formation. Further studies of larger samples with various skeletal conditions are warranted to confirm these findings.
| S-EPMC9741267 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Tianshu capsule (TSC), a formula of traditional Chinese medicine, has been widely used in clinical practice for prophylactic treatment of headaches in China. However, former clinical trials of TSC were small, and lack of a standard set of diagnostic criteria to enroll patients. The study was conducted to re-evaluate the efficacy and safety of TSC post-marketing in an extending number of migraineurs who have diagnosed migraine with the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version, ICHD-3?). METHODS:The study was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial that conducted at 20 clinical centers in China. At enrollment, patients between 18 and 65?years of age diagnosed with migraine were assigned to receive either TSC (4.08?g, three times daily) or a matched placebo according to a randomization protocol. The primary endpoint was a relative reduction of 50% or more in the frequency of headache attacks. The secondary outcomes included a reduction in the incidence of headache, the visual analogue scale of headache attacks, days of acute analgesic usage, and percentage of patients with a decrease of 50% or more in headache severity. Accompanying symptoms were also assessed. RESULTS:One thousand migraine patients were initially enrolled in the study, and 919 of them completed the trial. Following the 12-week treatment, significant improvement was observed in the TSC group concerning both primary and secondary outcomes. After therapy discontinuation, the gap between the TSC group and the placebo group in efficacy outcomes continued to increase. There were no severe adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS:TSC is an effective, well-tolerated medicine for prophylactic treatment of migraine, and still have prophylactic effect after medicine discontinuation. TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02035111; Data of registration: 2014-01-10.
| S-EPMC6915862 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe use of aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular events remains controversial. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of aspirin versus placebo in patients with a moderate estimated risk of a first cardiovascular event.MethodsARRIVE is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study done in seven countries. Eligible patients were aged 55 years (men) or 60 years (women) and older and had an average cardiovascular risk, deemed to be moderate on the basis of the number of specific risk factors. We excluded patients at high risk of gastrointestinal bleeding or other bleeding, or diabetes. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) with a computer-generated randomisation code to receive enteric-coated aspirin tablets (100 mg) or placebo tablets, once daily. Patients, investigators, and others involved in treatment or data analysis were masked to treatment allocation. The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite outcome of time to first occurrence of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, stroke, or transient ischaemic attack. Safety endpoints were haemorrhagic events and incidence of other adverse events, and were analysed in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00501059.FindingsBetween July 5, 2007, and Nov 15, 2016, 12 546 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive aspirin (n=6270) or placebo (n=6276) at 501 study sites. Median follow-up was 60 months. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the primary endpoint occurred in 269 (4·29%) patients in the aspirin group versus 281 (4·48%) patients in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·96; 95% CI 0·81-1·13; p=0·6038). Gastrointestinal bleeding events (mostly mild) occurred in 61 (0·97%) patients in the aspirin group versus 29 (0·46%) in the placebo group (HR 2·11; 95% CI 1·36-3·28; p=0·0007). The overall incidence rate of serious adverse events was similar in both treatment groups (n=1266 [20·19%] in the aspirin group vs n=1311 [20·89%] in the placebo group. The overall incidence of adverse events was similar in both treatment groups (n=5142 [82·01%] vs n=5129 [81·72%] in the placebo group). The overall incidence of treatment-related adverse events was low (n=1050 [16·75%] vs n=850 [13·54%] in the placebo group; p<0·0001). There were 321 documented deaths in the intention-to-treat population (n=160 [2·55%] vs n=161 [2·57%] of 6276 patients in the placebo group).InterpretationThe event rate was much lower than expected, which is probably reflective of contemporary risk management strategies, making the study more representative of a low-risk population. The role of aspirin in primary prevention among patients at moderate risk could therefore not be addressed. Nonetheless, the findings with respect to aspirin's effects are consistent with those observed in the previously published low-risk primary prevention studies.FundingBayer.
| S-EPMC7255888 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAsthma exacerbations are frequently induced by respiratory tract infections (RTIs). Bacterial lysates have been described to possess immune-modulatory effects and reduce RTIs as well as asthma symptoms in children. However, whether bacterial lysates have similar effects in adult asthma patients is unknown.AimsTo reduce asthma exacerbations by add-on bacterial lysate therapy in adults with severe asthma and to characterize the clinical and immune-modulatory effects of this treatment.MethodsAsthma patients (GINA 4) with ≥2 annual exacerbations in the previous year were included. The intervention regimen consisted of OM-85/placebo for 10 consecutive days per month for 6 months during two winter seasons. Primary end-point was the number of severe asthma exacerbations within 18 months. The study was approved by the national and local ethical review board and registered in the Dutch Trial Registry (NL5752). All participants provided written informed consent.ResultsSeventy-five participants were included (38 OM-85; 37 placebo). Exacerbation frequencies were not different between the groups after 18 months (incidence rate ratio 1.07, 95%CI [0.68-1.69], p = 0.77). With the use of OM-85, FEV1% increased by 3.81% (p = 0.04) compared with placebo. Nasopharyngeal swabs taken during RTIs detected a virus less frequently in patients using OM-85 compared to placebo (30.5% vs. 48.0%, p = 0.02). In subjects with type 2 inflammation adherent to the protocol (22 OM-85; 20 placebo), a non-statistically significant decrease in exacerbations in the OM-85 group was observed (IRR = 0.71, 95%CI [0.39-1.26], p = 0.25). Immune-modulatory effects included an increase in several plasma cytokines in the OM-85 group, especially IL-10 and interferons. Peripheral blood T- and B cell subtyping, including regulatory T cells, did not show differences between the groups.ConclusionAlthough OM-85 may have immune-modulatory effects, it did not reduce asthma exacerbations in this heterogeneous severe adult asthma group. Post hoc analysis showed a potential clinical benefit in patients with type 2 inflammation.
| S-EPMC9292626 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Abstract Proline‐rich polypeptides (PRPs complex also known as COLOCO®, Colostrinin®) consist of low‐molecular weight peptides ranging up to 10 kDa, isolated from the bovine colostrum obtained up to 48 h postpartum. PRPs have been shown to affect processes involved in inflammation, brain aging, and neurodegeneration. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of Colostrinin® (COLOCO®) on the cognitive abilities of healthy volunteers in three different age groups using the CANTAB tool in a double‐blind randomized placebo‐controlled study. BDNF serum level was used as a physicochemical marker of improvement of the cognitive skills. Three hundred and sixty‐one healthy volunteers were divided into three study groups aged 18–24, 25–54, and 55–75; each group was then divided into two subgroups which took either placebo or tested lozenge with 120 μg of PRPs for the period of 4 months. The CANTAB battery test was used to measure the efficacy of PRP in the context of cognitive functioning. After the treatment with COLOCO®, we observed differences within MoCA score in the oldest patients, improvement in DMS and drop in PAL scores within the youngest group, drop in RTI and improvement in RVP scores within the middle‐aged group. It was observed that serum BDNF level increased in all study groups which confirms cognitive improvement. In conclusion, we have shown that Colostrinin® exhibits cognitive enhancing effects, probably through the modulation of BDNF concentrations. Colostrinin®, isolated from the bovine colostrum, has been shown to affect processes involved in inflammation, brain aging, and neurodegeneration. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of colostrinin taking daily on the cognitive abilities of healthy volunteers in a double‐blind randomized placebo‐controlled study. We observed differences and improvement within results with cognitive test abilities. As a confirmation of cognitive abilities' enhancement, it was observed that serum BDNF level increased in all study groups, which confirms cognitive improvement.
| S-EPMC10002942 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundTo evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a poly-herbal formulation, Herbagut, for the treatment of gastrointestinal symptoms and its effect on quality of life parameters in patients presenting with self-reported, unsatisfactory bowel habits.MethodsThis was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Fifty adults with self-reported unsatisfactory bowel habits, primarily characterised by chronic constipation were randomly allocated to take Herbagut or a matching placebo for 28 days. Efficacy of gastrointestinal changes was measured by the completion of a patient daily diary evaluating changes in stool type (Bristol Stool Form Scale), ease of bowel movements, and feeling of complete evacuation; and the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS). Changes in quality of life were also examined using the World Health Organization Quality of Life - abbreviated version (WHOQOL-BREF), and the Patient Assessment of Constipation-Quality of Life (PAC-QOL).ResultsAll participants completed the 28-day trial with no adverse events reported. Compared to the placebo, weekly bowel movements increased over time (p < .001), as did self-reported, normal bowel motions (76% vs 4%; p < .001). Self-reported incomplete evacuation was also lower in the Herbagut group compared to placebo (24% vs 76%; p = <.001). GSRS domain ratings for abdominal pain, constipation, diarrhoea, indigestion, and reflux also decreased significantly in people taking Herbagut compared to placebo (p < .001, for all domains). Moreover, quality of life significantly improved in the Herbagut group compared to placebo as indicated by significantly greater improvement in WHOQOL-BREF domain ratings for overall quality of life, social relations, environmental health, psychological health, and physical health (p < .001, for all domains); and PAC-QOL domain ratings for physical discomfort, psychosocial discomfort, worries and concerns, and life satisfaction (p < .001, for all domains). The changes were considered clinically meaningful as evidenced by their large effect sizes.ConclusionHerbagut ingestion over a 28-day period resulted in improvements in several gastrointestinal symptoms and overall quality of life. Further investigation utilising larger sample sizes and diverse clinical and cultural populations are needed.Trial registrationClinical Trials Registry- India /2016/11/007479 . Registered 24 April 2015 (retrospectively registered).
| S-EPMC5859649 | biostudies-literature