Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Spring Break or Heart Break? Extending Valence Bias to Emotional Words


ABSTRACT: Ambiguous stimuli are useful for assessing emotional bias. For example, surprised faces could convey a positive or negative meaning, and the degree to which an individual interprets these expressions as positive or negative represents their “valence bias.” Currently, the most well-validated ambiguous stimuli for assessing valence bias include nonverbal signals (faces and scenes), overlooking an inherent ambiguity in verbal signals. This study identified 32 words with dual-valence ambiguity (i.e., relatively high intersubject variability in valence ratings and relatively slow response times) and length-matched clearly valenced words (16 positive, 16 negative). Preregistered analyses demonstrated that the words-based valence bias correlated with the bias for faces, rs(213) = .27, p < .001, and scenes, rs(204) = .46, p < .001. That is, the same people who interpret ambiguous faces/scenes as positive also interpret ambiguous words as positive. These findings provide a novel tool for measuring valence bias and greater generalizability, resulting in a more robust measure of this bias.

SUBMITTER: Harp N 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8552960 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC9996044 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4520557 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5447706 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4914497 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8593103 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4911411 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8970402 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7845528 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9515079 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6676801 | biostudies-literature