Dataset Information

Quantitative analysis of the ACL and PCL using T1rho and T2 relaxation time mapping: an exploratory, cross-sectional comparison between OA and healthy control knees

ABSTRACT:

Background

Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods such as T1rho and T2 mapping are sensitive to changes in tissue composition, however their use in cruciate ligament assessment has been limited to studies of asymptomatic populations or patients with posterior cruciate ligament tears only. The aim of this preliminary study was to compare T1rho and T2 relaxation times of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) between subjects with mild-to-moderate knee osteoarthritis (OA) and healthy controls.

Methods

A single knee of 15 patients with mild-to-moderate knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grades 2–3) and of 6 age-matched controls was imaged using a 3.0 T MRI. Three-dimensional (3D) fat-saturated spoiled gradient recalled-echo images were acquired for morphological assessment and T1ρ- and T2-prepared pseudo-steady-state 3D fast spin echo images for compositional assessment of the cruciate ligaments. Manual segmentation of whole ACL and PCL, as well as proximal / middle / distal thirds of both ligaments was carried out by two readers using ITK-SNAP and mean relaxation times were recorded. Variation between thirds of the ligament were assessed using repeated measures ANOVAs and differences in these variations between groups using a Kruskal-Wallis test. Inter- and intra-rater reliability were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

Results

In OA knees, both T1rho and T2 values were significantly higher in the distal ACL when compared to the rest of the ligament with the greatest differences in T1rho (e.g. distal mean = 54.5 ms, proximal = 47.0 ms, p < 0.001). The variation of T2 values within the PCL was lower in OA knees (OA: distal vs middle vs proximal mean = 28.5 ms vs 29.1 ms vs 28.7 ms, p = 0.748; Control: distal vs middle vs proximal mean = 26.4 ms vs 32.7 ms vs 33.3 ms, p = 0.009). ICCs were excellent for the majority of variables.

Conclusion

T1rho and T2 mapping of the cruciate ligaments is feasible and reliable. Changes within ligaments associated with OA may not be homogeneous. This study is an important step forward in developing a non-invasive, radiological biomarker to assess the ligaments in diseased human populations in-vivo.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04755-y.

SUBMITTER: Ranmuthu C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8556921 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:In pre-clinical models of brain gliomas, Relaxation Along a Fictitious Field in second rotating frame (TRAFF2), continues wave T1rho (T1ρcw), adiabatic T1rho (T1ρadiab), and adiabatic T2rho (T2ρadiab) relaxation time mappings have demonstrated potential to non-invasively characterize brain gliomas. Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility and potential of 4 different spin lock methods at 3T to characterize primary brain glioma. 22 patients (26-72 years) with suspected primary glioma. T1ρcw was performed using pulse peak amplitude of 500Hz and pulse train durations of 40 and 80 ms while the corresponding values for T1ρadiab, T2ρadiab, TRAFF2 were 500/500/500Hz and 48 and 96, 64 and 112, 45 and 90 ms, respectively. The parametric maps were calculated using a monoexponential model. Molecular profiles were evaluated from tissue specimens obtained during the resection. The lesion regions-of-interest were segmented from high intensity FLAIR using automatic segmentation with manual refinement. Statistical descriptors from the voxel intensity values inside each lesion and radiomic features (Pyrad MRC package) were calculated. From extracted radiomics, mRMRe R package version 2.1.0 was used to select 3 features in each modality for statistical comparisons. Of the 22 patients, 10 were found to have IDH-mutant gliomas and of those 5 patients had 1p/19q codeletion group comparisons. Following correction for effects of age and gender, at least one statistical descriptor was able to differentiate between IDH and 1p/19q codeletion status for all the parametric maps. In the radiomic analysis, corner-edge detector features with Harris-Stephens filtered signal showed significant group differences in IDH and 1p/19q codeletion groups. Spin lock imaging at 3T of human glioma was feasible and various qualitative parameters derived from the parametric maps were found to have potential to differentiate IDH and 1p19q codeletion status. Future larger prospective clinical trials are warranted to evaluate these methods further.

Project description:Background T2 mapping is an important cardiac MRI technique with applications in various conditions. However, a comprehensive evaluation of the T2 literature for normal values is lacking. Purpose To characterize the ranges of normal values and variability of myocardial T2 relaxation times using a systematic review and meta-analysis of the T2 literature. Materials and Methods PubMed and Cochrane Central were searched from June 2019 to January 2020 for myocardial T2 measurements in healthy adults. Studies quantifying T2 relaxation times conducted at 1.5 T or 3.0 T using gradient and spin-echo (GRASE) or T2-prepared balanced steady-state free precession sequences were included. Summary means were generated using a random-effects model. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were performed to assess factors causing heterogeneity. Results Of the 2481 articles retrieved, 42 studies were included with 954 healthy adults (mean age, 42.4 years ± 10.5 [standard deviation]; 538 men). The pooled mean of T2 across studies was 52 msec at 1.5 T (95% confidence interval [CI]: 51 msec, 53 msec) and 46 msec at 3.0 T (95% CI: 44 msec, 48 msec) (P ≤ .001). I2 was 98% at 1.5 T and 3.0 T. Meta-regression at 1.5 T and 3.0 T identified vendor (β at 1.5 T = -4 msec [with Philips as reference], P < .001; β at 3.0 T = -5 msec, P = .02) and pulse sequence (β at 1.5 T = -5 msec [with GRASE as reference], P < .001; β at 3.0 T = -6 msec, P = .002) as significant covariates, but it did not identify any association with covariates of age (β at 1.5 T = 0 msec per year, P = .70; β at 3.0 T = 0 msec per year, P = .83) or sex (β at 1.5 T = -1 msec, P = .88; β at 3.0 T = 6 msec, P = .42). Conclusion The pooled mean of T2 relaxation times in healthy adults had marked heterogeneity across studies with field strength, vendor, and pulse sequence identified as covariates associated with T2. T2-prepared measurements were similar between vendors at each field strength. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Project description:ObjectiveTo explore whether subregional laminar femorotibial cartilage spin-spin relaxation time (T2) is associated with subsequent radiographic progression and cartilage loss and/or whether one-year change in subregional laminar femorotibial cartilage T2 is associated with concurrent progression in knees with established radiographic OA (ROA).MethodsIn this case-control study, Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) knees with medial femorotibial progression were selected based on one-year loss in both quantitative cartilage thickness Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radiographic joint space width (JSW). Non-progressor knees were matched by sex, Body mass index (BMI), baseline Kellgren-Lawrence-grade (2/3), and pain. Baseline and one-year follow-up superficial and deep cartilage T2 was analyzed in 16 femorotibial subregions using multi-echo spin-echo MRI.Results37 knees showed medial femorotibial progression whereas 37 matched controls had no medial or lateral compartment progression. No statistically significant baseline differences between progressor and non-progressor knees in medial femorotibial cartilage T2 were observed in the superficial (48.9 ± 3.0 ms; 95% CI: [47.9, 49.9] vs 47.8 ± 3.6 ms; 95% CI: [46.6, 49.0], P = 0.07) or deep cartilage layer (40.8 ± 3.6 ms; 95% CI: [39.5, 42.0] vs 40.1 ± 4.7 ms; 95% CI: [38.5, 41.6], P = 0.29). Concurrent T2 change was more pronounced in the deep than the superficial cartilage layer. In the medial femorotibial compartment (MFTC), longitudinal change was greater in the deep layer of progressor than non-progressor knees (1.8 ± 4.5 ms; 95% CI: [0.3, 3.3] vs -0.2 ± 1.9 ms; 95% CI: [-0.8, 0.5], P = 0.02), whereas no difference was observed in the superficial layer.ConclusionMedial compartment cartilage T2 did not appear to be a strong prognostic factor for subsequent structural progression in the same compartment of knees with established ROA, when appropriately controlling for covariates. Yet, deep layer T2 change in the medial compartment occurred concurrent with medial femorotibial progression.