Dataset Information

The effect of the head-up position on cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

Experimental studies of head-up positioning (HUP) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) have had some degree of conflicting published results. The current study aim was to analyze and reconcile those discrepancies in order to better clarify the effects of HUP CPR compared to conventional supine (SUP) CPR.

Methods

Three databases (PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library) were searched comprehensively (from each respective database's inception to May 2021) for articles addressing HUP CPR. The primary outcome to be observed was cerebral perfusion pressure (CerPP), and secondary outcomes were mean intracranial pressure (ICP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), coronary perfusion pressure (CoPP) and frequencies of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).

Results

Seven key studies involving 131 animals were included for analysis. Compared to SUP CPR, CerPP (MD 10.37; 95% CI 7.11-13.64; p < 0.01; I² = 58%) and CoPP (MD 7.56; 95% CI 1.84-13.27, p = 0.01; I² = 75%) increased significantly with HUP CPR, while ICP (MD - 13.66; 95% CI - 18.6 to -8.71; p < 0.01; I² = 96%) decreased significantly. Combining all study methodologies, there were no significant differences detected in MAP (MD - 1.63; 95% CI - 10.77-7.52; p = 0.73; I² = 93%) or frequency of ROSC (RR 0.9; 95% CI 0.31-2.60; p = 0.84; I² = 65%). However, in contrast to worse outcomes in studies using immediate elevation of the head in a reverse Trendelenburg position, study outcomes were significantly improved when HUP (head and chest only) was introduced in a steady, graduated manner following a brief period of basic CPR augmented by active compression-decompression (ACD) and impedance threshold (ITD) devices.

Conclusion

In experimental models, gradually elevating the head and chest following a brief interval of circulatory priming with ACD and ITD devices can enhance CoPP, lower ICP and improve CerPP significantly while maintaining MAP. This effect is immediate, remains sustained and is associated with improved outcomes.

SUBMITTER: Huang CC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8557496 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The effect of the head-up position on cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Huang Cheng-Chieh CC Chen Kuan-Chih KC Lin Zih-Yang ZY Chou Yu-Hsuan YH Chen Wen-Liang WL Lee Tsung-Han TH Lin Kun-Te KT Hsieh Pei-You PY Chen Cheng Hsu CH Chou Chu-Chung CC Lin Yan-Ren YR

Critical care (London, England) 20211030 1

<h4>Objective</h4>Experimental studies of head-up positioning (HUP) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) have had some degree of conflicting published results. The current study aim was to analyze and reconcile those discrepancies in order to better clarify the effects of HUP CPR compared to conventional supine (SUP) CPR.<h4>Methods</h4>Three databases (PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library) were searched comprehensively (from each respective database's inception to May 2021) for articles ad ...[more]

PMID: 34717715

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundHead-up cardiopulmonary resuscitation (HU-CPR) is an experimental treatment for sudden cardiac arrest (SCA), where cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is performed in a ramped position. We evaluated whether HU-CPR improved survival and surrogate outcomes as compared to standard CPR (S-CPR).MethodsStudies reporting on HU-CPR in SCA were searched for in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library from inception to May 1st 2021. Outcomes included neurologically-intact survival, 24-hour-survival, intracranial pressure (ICP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CerPP) and brain blood flow (BBF). Risk of bias was assessed using the GRADE assessment tool and Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Fixed- and random-effects models were used to estimate the pooled effects of HU-CPR at 30 degrees.ResultsThirteen articles met the criteria for inclusion (11 animal-only studies, one before-and-after human-only study, one study that utilized human- and animal-cadavers). Among animal studies, the most common implementation of HU-CPR was a 30-degree upward tilt of the head and thorax (n=7), while four studies investigated controlled sequential elevation (CSE). Two animal studies reported improved cerebral performance category (CPC) scores at 24-hour. The pooled effect on 24-hour survival was not statistically significant (P=0.37). The lone human study reported doubled return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) (17.9% versus 34.2%, P<0.0001). The pooled effect on ROSC in three porcine studies was OR =3.63 (95% CI: 0.72-18.39). Pooled effects for surrogate physiological outcomes of intracranial cranial pressure (MD -14.08, 95% CI: -23.21 to -4.95, P=0.003), CerPP (MD 14.39, 95% CI: 3.07-25.72, P=0.01) and BBF (MD 0.14, 95% CI: 0.02-0.27, P=0.03), showed statistically significant benefit.DiscussionOverall, HU-CPR improved neurologically-intact survival at 24-hour, ROSC and physiological surrogate outcomes in animal models. Despite promising preclinical data, and one human observational study, clinical equipoise remains surrounding the role of HU-CPR in SCA, necessitating clarification with future randomized human trials.

Dataset Information

The effect of the head-up position on cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

The effect of the head-up position on cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets