Dataset Information

Prognostic role of EGR1 in breast cancer: a systematic review.

ABSTRACT: EGR1 (early growth response 1) is dysregulated in many cancers and exhibits both tumor suppressor and promoter activities, making it an appealing target for cancer therapy. Here, we used a systematic multi-omics analysis to review the expression of EGR1 and its role in regulating clinical outcomes in breast cancer (BC). EGR1 expression, its promoter methylation, and protein expression pattern were assessed using various publicly available tools. COSMIC-based somatic mutations and cBioPortal-based copy number alterations were analyzed, and the prognostic roles of EGR1 in BC were determined using Prognoscan and Kaplan-Meier Plotter. We also used bc-GenEx- Miner to investigate the EGR1 co-expression profile. EGR1 was more often downregulated in BC tissues than in normal breast tissue, and its knockdown was positively correlated with poor survival. Low EGR1 expression levels were also associated with increased risk of ER+, PR+, and HER2- BCs. High positive correlations were observed among EGR1, DUSP1, FOS, FOSB, CYR61, and JUN mRNA expression in BC tissue. This systematic review suggested that EGR1 expression may serve as a prognostic marker for BC patients and that clinicopathological parameters influence its prognostic utility. In addition to EGR1, DUSP1, FOS, FOSB, CYR61, and JUN can jointly be considered prognostic indicators for BC. [BMB Reports 2021; 54(10): 497-504].

SUBMITTER: Saha SK

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8560464 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Prognostic role of EGR1 in breast cancer: a systematic review.

Saha Subbroto Kumar SK Islam S M Riazul SMR Saha Tripti T Nishat Afsana A Biswas Polash Kumar PK Gil Minchan M Nkenyereye Lewis L El-Sappagh Shaker S Islam Md Saiful MS Cho Ssang-Goo SG

BMB reports 20211001 10

EGR1 (early growth response 1) is dysregulated in many cancers and exhibits both tumor suppressor and promoter activities, making it an appealing target for cancer therapy. Here, we used a systematic multi-omics analysis to review the expression of EGR1 and its role in regulating clinical outcomes in breast cancer (BC). EGR1 expression, its promoter methylation, and protein expression pattern were assessed using various publicly available tools. COSMIC-based somatic mutations and cBioPortal-base ...[more]

PMID: 34488929

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundBreast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide, with a great diversity in outcomes among individual patients. The ability to accurately predict a breast cancer outcome is important to patients, physicians, researchers, and policy makers. Many models have been developed and tested in different settings. We systematically reviewed the prognostic models developed and/or validated for patients with breast cancer.MethodsWe conducted a systematic search in four electronic databases and some oncology websites, and a manual search in the bibliographies of the included studies. We identified original studies that were published prior to 1st January 2017, and presented the development and/or validation of models based mainly on clinico-pathological factors to predict mortality and/or recurrence in female breast cancer patients.ResultsFrom the 96 articles selected from 4095 citations found, we identified 58 models, which predicted mortality (n = 28), recurrence (n = 23), or both (n = 7). The most frequently used predictors were nodal status (n = 49), tumour size (n = 42), tumour grade (n = 29), age at diagnosis (n = 24), and oestrogen receptor status (n = 21). Models were developed in Europe (n = 25), Asia (n = 13), North America (n = 12), and Australia (n = 1) between 1982 and 2016. Models were validated in the development cohorts (n = 43) and/or independent populations (n = 17), by comparing the predicted outcomes with the observed outcomes (n = 55) and/or with the outcomes estimated by other models (n = 32), or the outcomes estimated by individual prognostic factors (n = 8). The most commonly used methods were: Cox proportional hazards regression for model development (n = 32); the absolute differences between the predicted and observed outcomes (n = 30) for calibration; and C-index/AUC (n = 44) for discrimination. Overall, the models performed well in the development cohorts but less accurately in some independent populations, particularly in patients with high risk and young and elderly patients. An exception is the Nottingham Prognostic Index, which retains its predicting ability in most independent populations.ConclusionsMany prognostic models have been developed for breast cancer, but only a few have been validated widely in different settings. Importantly, their performance was suboptimal in independent populations, particularly in patients with high risk and in young and elderly patients.

Project description:ObjectiveCirculating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasingly being used as a potential prognostic biomarker in cancer patients. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of ctDNA in different subtypes of breast cancer patients throughout the whole treatment cycle.Materials and methodsPubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and clinical trials.gov databases were searched from January 2016 to May 2022. The following search terms were used: ctDNA OR circulating tumor DNA AND breast cancer OR breast carcinoma. Only studies written in English were included. The following pre-specified criteria should be met for inclusion: (i) original articles, conference abstracts, etc.; (ii) patients with breast cancer; (iii) ctDNA measurement; and (iv) clinical outcome data such as recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). The random-effects model was preferred considering the potential heterogeneity across studies. The main outcomes are ctDNA detection rate and postoperative long-term outcomes (RFS and OS).ResultsA total of 24 studies were screened. At every measurement time, the ctDNA detection rate of the HR+ subgroup was similar to that of the HR- subgroup (P = 0.075; P = 0.458; P = 0.744; and P = 0.578), and the ctDNA detection rate of the HER2+ subgroup was similar to that of the HER2- subgroup (P = 0.805; P = 0.271; P = 0.807; and P = 0.703). In the HR+ subgroup, RFS and OS of ctDNA positive patients were similar to those of ctDNA negative patients (P = 0.589 and P = 0.110), while RFS and OS of the ctDNA positive group was significantly shorter than those of the ctDNA negative patients in the HR- subgroup (HR = 4.03, P < 0.001; HR = 3.21, P < 0.001). According to HER grouping, the results were the same as above. In the triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) subgroup, the RFS and OS of ctDNA-positive patients was significantly shorter than of the ctDNA negative patients before and after surgery.ConclusionsctDNA was more predictive of recurrence-free survival and overall survival in the HR- subgroup than in the HR+ subgroup, and the same result was showed in the HER2- subgroup vs. HER2+ subgroup. The prognosis of the TNBC subtype is closely related to ctDNA before and after surgery.

Project description:BackgroundAs a potential genetic biomarker, tumor mutation burden (TMB) has made progress in numerous tumors. There are limited data regarding TMB and its prognostic role is controversial in breast cancer. This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the prognostic value of TMB on survival of breast cancer.MethodsThe databases PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for articles published through May 31, 2022. Moreover, effective data were extracted from included studies and calculated pooled effects of hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) by STATA 16.0. Heterogeneity was conducted by the I2 statistic and p-value. Using publication bias evaluation, sensitivity analysis, and subgroup analysis, the origin of heterogeneity was further investigated.ResultsThey were up to 1,722 patients collected from sixteen cohorts for this analysis. The pooled effects of HR for both OS (HR: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.83,1.58, p > 0.01) and PFS (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.53,1.71, p > 0.01) indicated no statistically significant difference in the high TMB and low TMB group. In immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) subgroup, high TMB patients demonstrated benefit of OS (HR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.59,0.87, p = 0.001) and PFS (HR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.35,0.77, p < 0.001), whereas difference was not statistically significant in the non-ICIs subgroup (OS, HR:1.76, 95% CI: 0.97,3.20, p = 0.062; PFS, HR:2.31, 95% CI: 0.89,5.97, p = 0.086). In addition, sensitivity analysis revealed that the pooled effects were stable. The funnel plot and Begg's test suggested the absence of publication bias.ConclusionMeta-analysis revealed that the prognostic relevance of TMB in breast cancer is limited in scope. High TMB may be associated with longer survival only in ICIs-based treatment, but the association is not evident in non-ICIs-based treatment.Trial registration[ https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO ], Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), identifier: CRD42022342488.

Dataset Information

Prognostic role of EGR1 in breast cancer: a systematic review.

Publications

Prognostic role of EGR1 in breast cancer: a systematic review.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets