Prognostic role of EGR1 in breast cancer: a systematic review.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Saha SK
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8560464 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have been found to play an important role in breast cancer, functioning either as potential oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes, but their role in the prognosis of patients remains unclear. The aim of the present review study is to highlight recent preclinical and clinical studies performed on both circulating and tissue-specific miRNAs and their potential role as prognostic markers in breast cancer. We systematically searched the PubMed database to explore the prognostic value of miRNAs in breast cancer. After performing the literature search and review, 117 eligible studies were identified. We found that 110 aberrantly expressed miRNAs have been associated with prognosis in breast cancer. In conclusion, the collective data presented in this review indicate that miRNAs could serve as novel prognostic tools in breast cancer, while the clinical application of these findings has yet to be verified.
| S-EPMC6935258 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundBreast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide, with a great diversity in outcomes among individual patients. The ability to accurately predict a breast cancer outcome is important to patients, physicians, researchers, and policy makers. Many models have been developed and tested in different settings. We systematically reviewed the prognostic models developed and/or validated for patients with breast cancer.MethodsWe conducted a systematic search in four electronic databases and some oncology websites, and a manual search in the bibliographies of the included studies. We identified original studies that were published prior to 1st January 2017, and presented the development and/or validation of models based mainly on clinico-pathological factors to predict mortality and/or recurrence in female breast cancer patients.ResultsFrom the 96 articles selected from 4095 citations found, we identified 58 models, which predicted mortality (n = 28), recurrence (n = 23), or both (n = 7). The most frequently used predictors were nodal status (n = 49), tumour size (n = 42), tumour grade (n = 29), age at diagnosis (n = 24), and oestrogen receptor status (n = 21). Models were developed in Europe (n = 25), Asia (n = 13), North America (n = 12), and Australia (n = 1) between 1982 and 2016. Models were validated in the development cohorts (n = 43) and/or independent populations (n = 17), by comparing the predicted outcomes with the observed outcomes (n = 55) and/or with the outcomes estimated by other models (n = 32), or the outcomes estimated by individual prognostic factors (n = 8). The most commonly used methods were: Cox proportional hazards regression for model development (n = 32); the absolute differences between the predicted and observed outcomes (n = 30) for calibration; and C-index/AUC (n = 44) for discrimination. Overall, the models performed well in the development cohorts but less accurately in some independent populations, particularly in patients with high risk and young and elderly patients. An exception is the Nottingham Prognostic Index, which retains its predicting ability in most independent populations.ConclusionsMany prognostic models have been developed for breast cancer, but only a few have been validated widely in different settings. Importantly, their performance was suboptimal in independent populations, particularly in patients with high risk and in young and elderly patients.
| S-EPMC6419427 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) has been investigated in various types of cancer; however, the role of PD-L1 expression in breast cancer remains controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the association of PD-L1 expression with clinicopathological variables, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) in invasive breast cancer. A total of 965 articles were included from CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, and Scopus databases. Of these, 22 studies encompassing 6468 cases of invasive breast cancer were included in the systematic review, and 15 articles were included in the meta-analysis. PD-L1 expression was associated with age ≥ 50 years, lymph node status-negative, progesterone receptor-negative, Ki67 ≥ 20%, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative. PD-L1 positivity was associated with worse OS (hazard ratio, HR, 2.39; 95% confidence interval, CI, 1.26-3.52; p =< 0.000); however, there was no significant improvement in DFS (HR 0.17; 95% CI -0.12-0.46; p =< 0.252). PD-L1 positivity was significantly associated with the clinicopathological characteristics of favorable and unfavorable prognoses. However, the final clinical outcome was associated with lower OS and had no significant association with DFS.
| S-EPMC8656531 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundHigh cathepsin D has been associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer; however, the results of many studies are controversial. Here, we assessed the association between high cathepsin D levels and worse breast cancer prognosis by conducting a meta-analysis.MethodsA comprehensive search strategy was used to search relevant literature in PUBMED and EMBASE by September 2018. The meta-analysis was performed in Review Manager 5.3 using hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsA total of 15,355 breast cancer patients from 26 eligible studies were included in this meta-analysis. Significant associations between elevated high cathepsin D and poor overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.35-1.92, p < 0.0001) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.31-2.18, p < 0.001) were observed. In the subgroup analysis for DFS, high cathepsin D was significantly associated with poor prognosis in node-positive patients (HR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.25-1.71, p < 0.00001), node-negative patients (HR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.39-2.27, p < 0.0001), early stage patients (HR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.34-2.23, p < 0.0001), and treated with chemotherapy patients (HR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.21-2.12, p < 0.001). Interestingly, patients treated with tamoxifen had a low risk of relapse when their cathepsin D levels were high (HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.52-0.98, p = 0.04) and a high risk of relapse when their cathepsin D levels were low (HR = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.22-1.85, p = 0.0001).ConclusionsOur meta-analysis suggests that high expression levels of cathepsin D are associated with a poor prognosis in breast cancer. Based on our subgroup analysis, we believe that cathepsin D can act as a marker for poor breast cancer prognosis and also as a therapeutic target for breast cancer.
| S-EPMC7281710 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:In patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, differentiating between patients with a low and a high risk of recurrence is an ongoing challenge. In current practice, prognostic clinical parameters are used for risk prediction. DNA methylation markers have been proven to be of additional prognostic value in several cancer types. Numerous prognostic DNA methylation markers for breast cancer have been published in the literature. However, to date, none of these markers are used in clinical practice. METHODS:We conducted a systematic review of PubMed and EMBASE to assess the number and level of evidence of published DNA methylation markers for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. To obtain an overview of the reporting quality of the included studies, all were scored according to the REMARK criteria that were established as reporting guidelines for prognostic biomarker studies. RESULTS:A total of 74 studies were identified reporting on 87 different DNA methylation markers. Assessment of the REMARK criteria showed variation in reporting quality of the studies. Eighteen single markers and one marker panel were studied in multiple independent populations. Hypermethylation of the markers RASSF1, BRCA, PITX2, CDH1, RARB, PCDH10 and PGR, and the marker panel GSTP1, RASSF1 and RARB showed a statistically significant correlation with poor disease outcome that was confirmed in at least one other, independent study. CONCLUSION:This systematic review provides an overview on published prognostic DNA methylation markers for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and identifies eight markers that have been independently validated. Analysis of the reporting quality of included studies suggests that future research on this topic would benefit from standardised reporting guidelines.
| S-EPMC6993426 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The prognostic value of phosphorylated Akt (pAkt) overexpression in breast cancer has been investigated by many studies with inconsistent results. This systematic review was conducted to evaluate the association of pAkt overexpression with breast cancer prognosis in terms of overall survival and disease-free survival. Three electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database) were comprehensively searched. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from different studies were combined using the random-effects model. In total, 33 studies with 9,836 patients were included for final analysis. The summary HR for overall survival and disease-free survival was 1.52 (95% CI: 1.29-1.78) and 1.28 (95% CI: 1.13-1.45), respectively, indicating higher risk of death and disease recurrence associated with pAkt overexpression. The results were robust in sensitivity analyses by omitting one study each time and by using the fixed-effects model instead. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses did not show that the prognostic effect of pAkt overexpression would change materially with such factors as population, status of hormone receptors, hormonal or trastuzumab treatment given, analyzing method (univariate versus multivariate) and methodological quality of the original studies. In conclusion, the available evidence suggests that pAkt overexpression is an adverse prognostic factor for breast cancer.
| S-EPMC4291578 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundIncreasing studies were performed to explore the prognostic value of snail in lung cancer (LC), however, with inconsistent results. Hence, this systematic review is aimed to evaluate the prognostic role of snail in patients with LC.MethodsA comprehensive literature search in the PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases will be conducted to identify eligible studies. Language is limited as English. We will employ hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) to estimate the correlations between snail expression and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and clinicopathological features. Meta-analysis will be performed using STATA 14.0 software.ResultsThis study will provide a high-quality synthesis of current evidence of the correlations between snail expression and OS, PFS/RFS/DFS, and clinicopathological features.ConclusionThe study will provide updated evidence to assess whether the expression of snail is in association with poor prognosis in patients with LC.Ethics and disseminationIt is not necessary for ethical approval because individuals cannot be identified. The protocol will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal or presented at a relevant conference.Prospero registration numberThis systematic review protocol has been registered in the PROSPERO network (No. CRD42018095191).
| S-EPMC6076196 | biostudies-literature
Project description:There is an unmet need for novel non-invasive prognostic molecular tumour markers for breast cancer (BC). Accumulating evidence shows that miR-155 plays a pivotal role in tumorigenesis. Generally, miR-155 is considered an oncogenic miRNA promoting tumour growth, angiogenesis and aggressiveness of BC. Therefore, many researchers have focused on its use as a prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target. However, its prognostic value for BC patients remains controversial. To address this issue, the present systematic review aims to summarize the available evidence and give a picture of a prognostic significance of miR-155 in BC pathology. All eligible studies were searched on PubMed and EMBASE databases through various search strategies. Starting from 289 potential eligible records, data were examined from 28 studies, comparing tissue and circulating miR-155 expression levels with clinicopathological features and survival rates in BC patients. We discuss the pitfalls and challenges that need to be assessed to understand the power of miR-155 to respond to real clinical needs, highlighting the consistency, robustness or lack of results obtained to sate in translating this molecule to clinical practice. Our paper suggests that the prognostic role of miR-155 in the management of BC needs to be further verified.
| S-EPMC7461504 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:The prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in esophageal cancer (EC) remains controversial. METHODS:The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between NLR and oncologic outcome of EC patients through a meta-analysis. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science and Embase for relevant studies. Meta-analysis was performed using hazard ratio (HR) and95% confidence interval (CI) as effect measures. RESULTS:Finally, 33 articles with 11,039patients were included in our study. The synthesized results indicated that the elevated NLR was negatively related to overall survival (OS) (HR?=?1.39, 95% CI: 1.23-1.54). When the patients were stratified according to country, pathological type, treatment strategies, sample size, and different HR estimate method, high NLR was also significantly correlated with poor OS. Similarly, elevated NLR was also associated with shorter disease-free survival (DFS), progress-free survival (PFS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). CONCLUSION:The elevated pretreatment NLR is associated with poor oncological outcomes in patients with EC. NLR may be a significant predictive biomarker in EC. Further large-cohort studies are needed to confirm these findings.
| S-EPMC6310576 | biostudies-other
Project description:PurposeThe objective of the present study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of published literature investigating the survivin expression and its effects on bladder cancer prognosis.Materials and methodsWe carefully searched online Pubmed, Cochrane Library and SCOPUS database from August 1997 to May 2013.ResultsA total of 14 articles met the eligibility criteria for this systematic review. The eligible studies included a total of 2,165 patients with a median number of 155 patients per study (range: 17-726). Of the 14 studies, nine evaluated immunohistochemistry in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks. In non-muscle invasive bladder tumor, the pooled hazard ratio (HR) was statistically significant for recurrence-free survival (pooled HR, 1.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-2.52), progression-free survival (pooled HR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.60-2.82), cancer-specific survival (pooled HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.32-3.06), and overall survival (pooled HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.02-2.29). The overall HRs by survivin status were robust across advanced stages. When only adjusted survival data were included, statistically significant differences were identified for all survival subgroup analyses. There was no between-study heterogeneity in the effect of survivin status on the majority of meta-analyses. There was no clear evidence of publication bias in this meta-analysis.ConclusionsSurvivin expression indicates worse prognosis in patients with bladder cancer but the results should be interpreted with caution. It is necessary that better-designed studies with standardized assays need to provide a better conclusion about the relationship between survivin expression and the outcome of patients with bladder cancer.
| S-EPMC3799942 | biostudies-literature