Dataset Information

Fatty Liver in Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer and Its Impact on Patient's Survival.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Long-term estrogen inhibition may cause fatty liver disease (non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; NAFLD) among other adverse conditions such as osteoporosis, climacteric symptoms, thromboembolism, dyslipidemia, and metabolic syndrome. The prevalence of NAFLD among breast cancer patients ranges from 2.3%-45.2%. This study aimed to determine the risk factors for newly developed NAFLD among breast cancer patients after hormonal treatment and whether it influences survival outcomes.

Methods

This retrospective study investigated hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative (HR+/HER2-), nonmetastatic breast cancer patients diagnosed between January 2010 and December 2018. All patients received adjuvant hormonal treatment for at least 6 months. Clinical data on metabolic profile indicators such as body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, serum cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), diabetes, and presence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) were collected. In total, 160 eligible patients with complete covariate data and survival follow-up were included.

Results

NAFLD was diagnosed in 35% of patients. There were significant associations of being overweight (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m²), waist circumference > 80 cm, triglycerides ≥ 150 mg/dL, HDL-C ≤ 50 mg/dL, LDL-C < 150 mg/dL, and presence of MetS with the development of NAFLD. However, unlike other factors, MetS and HDL-C were not independently associated with NAFLD. Patients with breast cancer who developed NAFLD had longer disease-free survival (DFS). The median DFS was not reached in the NAFLD group, whereas it was 59.3 (45.6-73.0) months in the non-NAFLD group. No worsening of overall survival was observed in patients with breast cancer and NAFLD.

Conclusion

The development of NAFLD during treatment in patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer was associated with several independent risk factors: being overweight, waist circumference, triglycerides, and LDL-C. Interestingly, breast cancer patients with NAFLD during treatment had longer DFS than those without NAFLD.

SUBMITTER: Taroeno-Hariadi KW

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8561135 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Importance:Steroid hormone receptors, including estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR), are crucial biomarkers in breast cancer (BC). However, limited data are available regarding single hormone receptor-positive (ER-positive/PR-negative and ER-negative/PR-positive) subtypes, rendering treatment decision and survival forecast difficult in patients with these BC subtypes. Objective:To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and BC-specific survival (BCSS) of patients with single hormone receptor-positive BC. Design, Setting, and Participants:In this cohort study, data on patients diagnosed with BC between 1990 and 2015 were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (N = 1 158 032). Patients lacking information on ER status, PR status, or BCSS were excluded (n = 334 633). Comparisons were performed between single hormone receptor-positive BC and double hormone receptor-positive/double hormone receptor-negative BC. The dates of analysis were September 1, 2018, to June 31, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures:The BCSS of patients with single hormone receptor-positive BC. Results:This cohort study included 823 399 patients with BC (818 002 women and 5397 men). The median (range) age at diagnosis was 60 (8-108) years, and the median (range) follow-up duration was 71 (0-311) months. The percentages of ER-positive/PR-positive, ER-positive/PR-negative, ER-negative/PR-positive, and ER-negative/PR-negative cases were 67.2%, 12.2%, 1.6%, and 19.0%, respectively. Single hormone receptor-positive subtypes showed distinct clinical characteristics compared with double hormone receptor-positive/double hormone receptor-negative subtypes. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that patients with ER-positive/PR-negative (hazard ratio [HR], 1.36; 95% CI, 1.34-1.38) and ER-negative/PR-positive (HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.55-1.67) tumors had worse BCSS than patients with the ER-positive/PR-positive subtype. In contrast, patients with ER-positive/PR-negative (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.24-1.29) and ER-negative/PR-positive (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.03-1.11) tumors had better BCSS than patients with the ER-negative/PR-negative subtype. The BCSS was statistically significantly worse in patients with ER-negative/PR-positive tumors than in patients with ER-positive/PR-negative tumors (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.14-1.23). Conclusions and Relevance:In this cohort study, statistically significant distinctions between survival rates of patients with single hormone receptor-positive BC vs double hormone receptor-positive/double hormone receptor-negative BC were observed. Different strategies may be required for patients with single hormone receptor-positive tumors to ensure optimal treatment and maximum benefits from therapies.

Project description:BackgroundAKT pathway activation is implicated in endocrine-therapy resistance. Data on the efficacy and safety of the AKT inhibitor capivasertib, as an addition to fulvestrant therapy, in patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer are limited.MethodsIn a phase 3, randomized, double-blind trial, we enrolled eligible pre-, peri-, and postmenopausal women and men with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer who had had a relapse or disease progression during or after treatment with an aromatase inhibitor, with or without previous cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor therapy. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive capivasertib plus fulvestrant or placebo plus fulvestrant. The dual primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival assessed both in the overall population and among patients with AKT pathway-altered (PIK3CA, AKT1, or PTEN) tumors. Safety was assessed.ResultsOverall, 708 patients underwent randomization; 289 patients (40.8%) had AKT pathway alterations, and 489 (69.1%) had received a CDK4/6 inhibitor previously for advanced breast cancer. In the overall population, the median progression-free survival was 7.2 months in the capivasertib-fulvestrant group, as compared with 3.6 months in the placebo-fulvestrant group (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51 to 0.71; P<0.001). In the AKT pathway-altered population, the median progression-free survival was 7.3 months in the capivasertib-fulvestrant group, as compared with 3.1 months in the placebo-fulvestrant group (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.65; P<0.001). The most frequent adverse events of grade 3 or higher in patients receiving capivasertib-fulvestrant were rash (in 12.1% of patients, vs. in 0.3% of those receiving placebo-fulvestrant) and diarrhea (in 9.3% vs. 0.3%). Adverse events leading to discontinuation were reported in 13.0% of the patients receiving capivasertib and in 2.3% of those receiving placebo.ConclusionsCapivasertib-fulvestrant therapy resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival than treatment with fulvestrant alone among patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer whose disease had progressed during or after previous aromatase inhibitor therapy with or without a CDK4/6 inhibitor. (Funded by AstraZeneca and the National Cancer Institute; CAPItello-291 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04305496.).