Dataset Information

Longitudinal survival trends of patients with cancer with surgically managed appendicular metastatic bone disease: systematic review

ABSTRACT:

Background:

Advances in systemic cancer therapies have improved survival for patients with metastatic carcinoma; however, it is unknown whether these advances have translated to improved survival for patients with appendicular metastatic bone disease (A-MBD) after orthopedic interventions. We conducted a study to evaluate the trend in overall survival for patients who underwent orthopedic surgery for A-MBD between 1968 and 2018.

Methods:

A systematic search of Embase and Medline to identify studies published since 1968 evaluating patients treated with orthopedic surgery for A-MBD was conducted for a previously published scoping review. We used a meta-regression model to assess the longitudinal trends in 1-, 2- and 5-year overall survival between 1968 and 2018. The midpoint year of patient inclusion for each study was used for analysis. We categorized primary tumour types into a tumour severity score according to prognosis for a further meta-regression analysis.

Results:

Of the 5747 studies identified, 103 were retained for analysis. Meta-regression analysis showed no significant effect of midpoint study year on survival across all time points. There was no effect of the weighted average of tumour severity scores for each study on 1-year survival over time.

Conclusion:

There was no significant improvement in overall survival between 1968 and 2018 for patients with A-MBD who underwent orthopedic surgery. Orthopedic intervention remains a poor prognostic variable for patients with MBD. This finding highlights the need for improved collection of prospective data in this population to identify patients with favourable survival outcomes who may benefit from personalized oncologic surgical interventions.

SUBMITTER: Abbott A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8565884 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveRathke cleft cysts (RCC) are benign lesions of the sellar region that require surgical treatment in case of visual deterioration or progression of the cyst. However, the natural course is often stable and asymptomatic. We aimed to investigate the characteristics of patients with cyst progression during follow-up (FU) and to compare the natural history of patients with RCC with patients who underwent surgery.MethodsPatients with an MR morphologic cystic sellar lesion classified as RCC between 04/2001 and 11/2020 were included. Functional outcomes, including ophthalmologic, endocrinologic, and MRI data, were retrospectively analyzed and compared between surgically treated patients, patients on a "watch and wait" strategy (WWS), and patients on a WWS who underwent secondary surgery due to cyst progression.ResultsOne hundred forty patients (median age 42.8 years) with RCC on MRI were identified. 52/140 (37.1%) underwent primary surgery. Of 88 patients (62.9%) with initial WWS, 21 (23.9%) underwent surgery for secondary cyst progression. Patients on the WWS had significantly smaller cyst volumes (p = 0.0001) and fewer visual disturbances (p = 0.0004), but a similar rate of hormone deficiencies (p = 0.99) compared with surgically treated patients preoperatively. Postoperatively patients suffered significantly more often from hormone deficiencies than WWS patients (p = 0.001). Patients who switched to the surgical group were significantly more likely to have preoperative T1 hyperintense signals on MRI (p = 0.0001) and visual disturbances (p = 0.001) than patients with continuous WWS. Postoperatively, these patients suffered more frequently from new hormonal deficiencies (p = 0.001). Endocrine and ophthalmologic outcomes in patients with primary and secondary surgery were comparable. Multivariate analysis showed that WWS patients were at a higher risk of requiring surgery for cyst progression when perimetric deficits (p = 0.006), hyperprolactinemia (p = 0.003), and corticotropic deficits (p = 0.005) were present.ConclusionSurgical treatment of RCC may cause new hormonal deficiencies, which are rare in the natural course. Therefore, the indication for surgery should be carefully evaluated. Hyperprolactinemia and corticotropic deficits were significant indicators for a secondary cyst progression in patients with RCC. However, a significant amount of almost 25% of initially conservatively managed cysts showed deterioration, necessary for surgical intervention.