Dataset Information

Molecular markers of systemic therapy response in urothelial carcinoma.

ABSTRACT: Identification of reliable molecular biomarkers that can complement clinical practice represents a fascinating challenge in any cancer field. Urothelial carcinoma is a very heterogeneous disease and responses to systemic therapies, and outcomes after radical cystectomy are difficult to predict. Advances in molecular biology such as next generation sequencing and whole genome or transcriptomic analysis provide promising platforms to achieve a full understanding of the biology behind the disease and can identify emerging predictive biomarkers. Moreover, the ability to categorize patients' risk of recurrence after curative treatment, or even predict benefit from a conventional or targeted therapies, represents a compelling challenge that may reshape both selection for tailored treatment and disease monitoring. Progress has been made but currently no molecular biomarkers are used in the clinical setting to predict response to systemic agents in either neoadjuvant or adjuvant settings highlighting a relevant unmet need. Here, we aim to present the emerging role of molecular biomarkers in predicting response to systemic agents in urothelial carcinoma.

SUBMITTER: Claps F

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8566362 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Molecular markers of systemic therapy response in urothelial carcinoma.

Claps Francesco F Mir Maria Carmen MC Zargar Homayoun H

Asian journal of urology 20210514 4

Identification of reliable molecular biomarkers that can complement clinical practice represents a fascinating challenge in any cancer field. Urothelial carcinoma is a very heterogeneous disease and responses to systemic therapies, and outcomes after radical cystectomy are difficult to predict. Advances in molecular biology such as next generation sequencing and whole genome or transcriptomic analysis provide promising platforms to achieve a full understanding of the biology behind the disease a ...[more]

PMID: 34765445

Similar Datasets

Project description:Upper tract urothelial carcinoma comprises 5-10% of all urothelial carcinoma cases. This disease tends to have a more aggressive course than its lower urinary tract counterpart, with 60% of patients presenting with invasive disease and 30% of patients presenting with metastatic disease at diagnosis. The diagnostic workup of UTUC involves imaging with CT urogram, urine cytology, and direct visualization and biopsy of suspected lesions via ureteroscopy. Standard treatment of high-grade UTUC involves radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and excision of the ipsilateral bladder cuff. Both the NCCN and EAU Guidelines include neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a treatment option for select patients with UTUC; however, there are no strict guidelines. Much of the rationale for neoadjuvant chemotherapy is based on extrapolation from data from muscle-invasive bladder cancer, which has demonstrated a 5-year OS benefit of 5-8%. Retrospective studies evaluating the use of NACT in urothelial carcinoma have yielded pathologic objective response rates of 48% in UTUC cohorts. The randomized Phase III POUT study noted a DFS advantage with adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy, compared with surveillance in UTUC, of 70% vs. 51% at 2 years. Though not the standard of care, multiple studies have explored the use of perioperative immunotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy in the management of invasive urothelial carcinoma. The PURE-02 study explored the use of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab in patients with high-risk UTUC. A small study of 10 patients, it showed no significant signals of activity with neoadjuvant pembrolizumab. Another Phase II study of neoadjuvant ipilimumab and nivolumab in cisplatin-ineligible UTUC yielded more promising findings, with 3/9 patients attaining a pathologic CR and the remaining six pathologically downstaged. The ABACUS trial found a 31% pathologic complete response rate amongst cisplatin-ineligible MIBC patients treated with neoadjuvant atezolizumab. The use of adjuvant immunotherapy has been explored over three phase III trials. The CheckMate-274 trial found a DFS benefit with the addition of one year of adjuvant nivolumab in patients with high-risk urothelial carcinoma. The IMvigor-010 study of adjuvant atezolizumab was a negative study. The AMBASSADOR trial of adjuvant pembrolizumab is pending results. With the FDA approval of erdafitinib in metastatic urothelial carcinoma, similar targets have been explored for use in perioperative use in invasive urothelial carcinoma, as with adjuvant infigratinib in the PROOF-302 trial. As the treatment paradigm for urothelial carcinoma evolves, further prospective studies are needed to expand the perioperative treatment landscape of UTUC.

Project description:BackgroundSystemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease associated with increased susceptibility to cancer, including bladder urothelial carcinoma (BLCA). This study investigates the shared molecular mechanisms and gene signatures between SLE and BLCA, shedding light on potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets.MethodsWe compiled gene datasets related to SLE and BLCA from various databases and identified common genes. Differential gene expression analysis, protein-protein interaction networks, and hub gene identification were performed. We studied functional enrichment, immune infiltration, and transcription factor/miRNA regulation networks. We also explored gene-disease interactions and protein-chemical/drug networks. Hub gene expression levels and diagnostic values were validated in TCGA and GEO databases. Prognostic analysis was performed on the core gene MMP9 in the TCGA-BLCA database to study its prognostic value. Finally, the mRNA expression of MMP9 was verified in bladder cancer cell lines and BLCA patient blood. The diagnostic value of MMP9 for BLCA was verified by receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve analysis of the expression of MMP9 in patients' blood.ResultsWe identified 524 common genes between SLE and BLCA, enriched in pathways related to apoptosis and cytokine regulation. Immune infiltration analysis for two diseases. Transcription factors and microRNAs were implicated in regulating these common genes. The gene-disease network linked hub genes with various diseases, emphasizing their roles in autoimmune disease and cancer. Protein-chemical/drug networks highlighted potential treatment options. Finally, our study found that MMP9 is a potential therapeutic target with diagnostic and prognostic value and Immune-related biomarkers in patients with BLCA and SLE.ConclusionOur study reveals shared molecular mechanisms, genetic signatures, and immune infiltrates between SLE and BLCA. MMP9 emerges as a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in BLCA, warranting further investigation. These findings provide insights into the pathogenesis of SLE-associated BLCA and may guide future research and therapeutic strategies.

Dataset Information

Molecular markers of systemic therapy response in urothelial carcinoma.

Publications

Molecular markers of systemic therapy response in urothelial carcinoma.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets