Dataset Information

Comparing the minimum local anesthetic dose of ropivacaine in real-time ultrasound-guided spinal anesthesia and traditional landmark-guided spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial of knee surgery patients.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Through previous studies and clinical practice, we have found that real-time ultrasound-guided (UG) spinal anesthesia (SA) and traditional landmark-guided (LG) SA each require a different minimum local anesthetic dose (MLAD) of ropivacaine. For this study, we used Dixon's up-and-down sequential method to analyze and compare the MLAD of different ropivacaine concentrations required for the UG and LG SA methods.

Methods

A total of 120 patients undergoing knee surgery were consecutively recruited and randomly divided into four groups (30 patients per group). These groups were categorized as follows: Group I: high ropivacaine ultrasound-guided (HRUG), Group II: low ropivacaine ultrasound-guided (LRUG), Group III: high ropivacaine landmark-guided (HRLG), and Group IV: low ropivacaine landmark-guided (LRLG). SA was established by a bolus administration of up-and-down doses of 0.75% or 0.5% plain ropivacaine. Initial doses of 16, 18, 12, and 14 mg were administered to groups I-IV, and after that, increased or decreased by 1.5 mg according to dose effectiveness. Upon identifying the intervertebral puncture level, a lumbar X-ray was performed with metal markers, and actual radiographic findings were identified and compared to the initial markings.

Results

For UG groups, the MLAD in the LRUG group was significantly higher than in the HRUG group [20.192 mg (95% CI, 19.256-21.174) versus 17.176 mg (95% CI, 16.276-18.124), respectively; P<0.001]. For LG groups, the MLAD in the LRLG group was significantly higher than in the HLRG group [14.478 mg (95% CI, 13.364-15.500) versus 13.201 mg (95% CI, 11.959-14.571), respectively; P=0.047]. When comparing both high ropivacaine groups (HRGs: I/III) to the low ropivacaine groups (LRGs: II/IV), we found that both UG subgroups (I/II) had a significantly higher MLAD than LG subgroups (III/IV) (P<0.001). US identified L4-5 in up to 90% of cases. Comparatively, palpation was successful in only 33.3% of patients. The rates of cephalad localization by US and palpation were 6.67% vs. 66.67%, respectively (P=0.002).

Conclusions

We found a higher MLAD of ropivacaine was required for UG SA at the L4-5 level due to the method providing a more accurate (less cephalad) localization than traditional LG SA.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2000033158.

SUBMITTER: Zheng T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8573435 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparing the minimum local anesthetic dose of ropivacaine in real-time ultrasound-guided spinal anesthesia and traditional landmark-guided spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial of knee surgery patients.

Zheng Ting T Zheng Chun-Ying CY Yan Lai-Peng LP Guo Hui-Ling HL You Yi Y Ye Peng P Hu Bin B Zheng Xiao-Chun XC

Annals of translational medicine 20211001 19

<h4>Background</h4>Through previous studies and clinical practice, we have found that real-time ultrasound-guided (UG) spinal anesthesia (SA) and traditional landmark-guided (LG) SA each require a different minimum local anesthetic dose (MLAD) of ropivacaine. For this study, we used Dixon's up-and-down sequential method to analyze and compare the MLAD of different ropivacaine concentrations required for the UG and LG SA methods.<h4>Methods</h4>A total of 120 patients undergoing knee surgery were ...[more]

PMID: 34805354

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCombined spinal-epidural (CSE) anesthesia is considerably challenging for elderly patients with hip fractures due to spine degeneration and limitations in positioning. This study aimed to investigate the ability of a modified preprocedural ultrasound-guided technique to improve the success rate and efficacy of CSE anesthesia for elderly patients with hip fractures.MethodsThis prospective, single-blinded, parallel-group randomized controlled trial included 80 patients (aged ≥65 years) who were scheduled for elective hip fracture surgery with CSE anesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated into landmark group (n = 40) or the ultrasound group (n = 40). The primary outcome was first-pass success rate. Secondary outcomes included first-attempt success rate; number of needle insertion attempts; number of needle passes; locating, puncture, and total time; level of block; procedural adverse reactions and postoperative complications; and patient satisfaction score. Patients were blinded to group allocation.ResultsEighty patients completed the study and were included in the final analysis. The first-pass success rates for the landmark and ultrasound groups were 20 and 70%, respectively (P < 0.001). The first-attempt success rates in the landmark and ultrasound groups were 42.5 and 85%, respectively (P < 0.001). The median number of attempts was lower in ultrasound-assisted group (1 [1]) than landmark-guided group (2 [1, 2]), P < 0.001). The median number of needle passes was lower in ultrasound group (1 [1, 2]) than in landmark-guided group (3 [2, 4], P < 0.001). The locating time (P < 0.001) and total time (P = 0.001) were longer in the ultrasound group, while puncture time was shorter (P = 0.003). No significant difference was found regarding the incidence of adverse reactions and complications. More patients in the ultrasound group had a high satisfaction score of 4-5 (P = 0.007). Interestingly, subgroup analysis demonstrated benefits for ultrasound in patients with scoliosis.ConclusionsModified ultrasound-assisted CSE anesthesia increases first-pass and first-attempt success rates, and reduces needle insertion attempts, passes, and puncture time for elderly patients with hip fracture, especially those with scoliosis. This technique improves patient satisfaction and warrants consideration for application in clinical practice.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Register (identifier, ChiCTR1900020819 ; date of registration, January 20, 2019).

Project description:BackgroundCaudal epidural block (CEB) provides reliable anesthesia for adults undergoing anorectal surgery. Despite the widely utilization, the minimum effective concentration for 90% patients (MEC90) of ropivacaine for CEB remains unknown.ObjectiveTo estimate MEC of ropivacaine for CEB in anorectal surgery.DesignA prospective dose-finding study using biased coin design up-and-down sequential method.SettingOperating room and postoperative recovery area of Chengdu Shangjin Nanfu Hospital, from October 2019 to January 2020.Patients50 males and 51 females scheduled for anorectal surgery.InterventionsWe conducted two independent biased coin design up-and down trials by genders. The concentration of ropivacaine administered to the first patient of male and female were 0.25% with fixed volume of 14ml for male and 12ml for female patients based on our previous study. In case of failure, the concentration was increased by 0.05% in the next subject. Otherwise, the next subject was randomized to a concentration 0.05% less with a probability of 0.11, or the same concentration with a probability of 0.89. Success was defined as complete sensory blockade of perineal area 15 min after the block evidenced by the presence of a lax anal sphincter and pain-free surgery.Main outcome measuresThe MEC of ropivacaine to achieve a successful CEB in 90%(MEC90) of the patients.ResultsThe MEC90 of ropivacaine for CEB were estimated to be 0.35% (95% CI 0.29 to 0.4%) for male and 0.353% (95%CI 0.22 to 0.4%) for female. By extrapolation to MEC in 99% of subjects (MEC99) and pooled adjacent violators algorithm (PAVA) adjusted responses, it would be optimal to choose 0.4% ropivacaine with a volume of 14ml for male and 12ml for female.ConclusionsA concentration of 0.35% ropivacaine with a volume of 14ml provided a successful CEB in 90% of the male patients, while 0.353% ropivacaine with a volume of 12ml provided a successful CEB in 90% of the female patients. A concentration of 0.4% and a volume of 14ml for male and 12 ml for female would be successful in 99% of the patients.Trial registrationChictr.org.cn identifier: No. ChiCTR 1900024315.

Dataset Information

Comparing the minimum local anesthetic dose of ropivacaine in real-time ultrasound-guided spinal anesthesia and traditional landmark-guided spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial of knee surgery patients.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Trial registration

Publications

Comparing the minimum local anesthetic dose of ropivacaine in real-time ultrasound-guided spinal anesthesia and traditional landmark-guided spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial of knee surgery patients.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets