Dataset Information

Impact of lymphopenia on survival for elderly patients with glioblastoma: A secondary analysis of the CCTG CE.6 (EORTC 26062-22061, TROG03.01) randomized clinical trial.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Lymphopenia may lead to worse outcomes for glioblastoma patients. This study is a secondary analysis of the CCTG CE.6 trial evaluating the impact of chemotherapy and radiation on lymphopenia, and effects of lymphopenia on overall survival (OS).

Methods

CCTG CE.6 randomized elderly glioblastoma patients (≥ 65 years) to short-course radiation alone (RT) or short-course radiation with temozolomide (RT + TMZ). Lymphopenia (mild-moderate: grade 1-2; severe: grade 3-4) was defined per CTCAE v3.0, and measured at baseline, 1 week and 4 weeks post-RT. Preselected key factors for analysis included age, sex, ECOG, resection extent, MGMT methylation, Mini-Mental State Examination, and steroid use. Multinomial logistic regression and multivariable Cox regression models were used to identify lymphopenia-associated factors and association with survival.

Results

Five hundred and sixty-two patients were analyzed (281 RT vs 281 RT+TMZ). At baseline, both arms had similar rates of mild-moderate (21.4% vs 21.4%) and severe (3.2% vs 2.9%) lymphopenia. However, at 4 weeks post-RT, RT+TMZ was more likely to develop lymphopenia (mild-moderate: 27.9% vs 18.2%; severe: 9.3% vs 1.8%; p<0.001). Developing any lymphopenia post-RT was associated with baseline lymphopenia (P < .001). Baseline lymphopenia (hazard ratio [HR] 1.3) was associated with worse OS (HR: 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.62; P = .02), regardless of MGMT status.

Conclusions

Development of post-RT lymphopenia is associated with addition of TMZ and baseline lymphopenia and not with RT alone in patients treated with short-course radiation. However, regardless of MGMT status, only baseline lymphopenia is associated with worse OS, which may be considered as a prognostic biomarker for elderly glioblastoma patients.

SUBMITTER: Song AJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8577525 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND: The EORTC (26981-22981)/NCIC CTG (CE.3) RCT in newly diagnosed GBM showed increased survival with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) added to radiotherapy (RT). Study pts were 18-71 (median 56) years; however a sub-group analysis noted a trend of decreasing benefit from the addition of TMZ with increasing age, such that for age 65-71, the hazard ratio of 0.8 did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.340). This may reflect a lack of efficacy in elderly patients, or simply be due to a lack of statistical power in this subgroup. Recent RCTs in elderly GBM found improved survival with RT compared to supportive care alone and detected non-inferiority of 40 Gy/15 vs. a 60 Gy/30 RT regimen and superior survival was noted for MGMT-methylated patients treated with TMZ alone vs RT alone. Based upon these results short-course hypofractionated RT is often recommended for elderly pts. However, whether the addition of TMZ to RT confers a survival advantage in elderly pts, particularly for those with methylated MGMT, remains unanswered. METHODS: We conducted a global randomized phase III clinical trial for patients ≥65 yrs of age with histologically confirmed newly diagnosed glioblastoma, ECOG 0-2, randomized 1:1 to receive 40Gy/15 RT vs. 40Gy/15 RT with 3 weeks of concomitant temozolomide plus monthly adjuvant TMZ until progression or 12 cycles. Stratification is by centre, age (65-70, 71-75, or 76+), ECOG 0,1 vs 2, and biopsy vs resection. RESULTS: Accrual of n = 562 patients was completed Sept 19, 2013. Accrual by participating group was NCIC CTG 199, EORTC 249, TROG 97, and Japan 17 patients. Median age of randomized patients was 73 (65-90) years with 70% of patients over the age of 71. The study was powered to detect a HR of 0.75 in median OS, requiring 520 events for analysis. At the time of writing the required number of deaths had not been reached. A comprehensive analysis, including MGMT promoter methylation and QOL, is planned. CONCLUSIONS: A global cooperative group trial was completed randomizing 562 elderly patients with glioblastoma. The final results will add to our knowledge on the optimal treatment of these patients. SECONDARY CATEGORY: n/a.

Project description:The optimal time to initiate adjuvant therapy (AT) in elderly patients with glioblastoma (GBM) remains unclear. We investigated the impact of timing to start AT on overall survival (OS) using two national-scale datasets covering elderly GBM populations in the United States. A total of 3159 and 8161 eligible elderly GBM patients were derived from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked dataset (2004-2013) and the National Cancer Database (NCDB) (2004-2014), respectively. The intervals in days from the diagnosis to the initiation of AT were categorized based on two scenarios: Scenario I (quartiles), ≤ 15, 16-26, 27-37, and ≥ 38 days; Scenario II (median), < 27, and ≥ 27 days. The primary outcome was OS. We performed the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression methods for survival analysis. A sensitivity analysis was performed using Propensity Score Matching (PSM) method to achieve well-balanced characteristics between early-timing and delayed-timing in Scenario II. Improved OS was observed among patients who underwent resection and initiated AT with either a modest delay (27-37 days) or a longer delay (≥ 38 days) compared to those who received AT immediately (≤ 15 days) from both the SEER-Medicare dataset [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.74, 95% CI 0.64-0.84, P < 0.001; and aHR 0.81, 95% CI 0.71-0.92, P = 0.002] and the NCDB (aHR 0.83, 95% CI 0.74-0.93, P = 0.001; and aHR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77-0.98, P = 0.017). The survival advantage is observed in delayed-timing group as well in Scenario II. For elderly patients who had biopsy only, improved OS was only detected in a longer delay (Scenario I: ≥ 38 days vs. ≤ 15 days) or the delayed-timing group (Scenario II: ≥ 27 days vs. < 27 days) in the NCDB while no survival difference was seen in SEER-Medicare population. For the best timing to start AT in elderly GBM patients, superior survivals were observed among those who had craniotomy and initiated AT with a modest (27-37 days) or longer delays (≥ 38 days) following diagnosis using both the SEER-Medicare and NCDB datasets (Scenario I). Such survival advantage was confirmed when categorizing delayed-timing vs. early-timing with the cut-off at 27 day in both datasets (Scenario II). The increased likelihood of receiving delayed AT (≥ 27 days) was significantly associated with tumor resection (STR/GTR), years of diagnosis after 2006, African American and Hispanics races, treatments at academic facilities, and being referred. There is no difference in timing of AT on survival among elderly GBM patients who had biopsy in the SEER-Medicare dataset. In conclusion, initiating AT with a modest delay (27-37 days) or a longer delay (≥ 38 days) after craniotomy may be the preferred timing in the elderly GBM population.