Dataset Information

Safety, Immunogenicity and Interchangeability of Biosimilar Monoclonal Antibodies and Fusion Proteins: A Regulatory Perspective.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Biosimilars have been used for 15 years in the European Union (EU), and have been shown to reduce costs and increase access to important biological medicines. In spite of their considerable exposure and excellent safety record, many prescribers still have doubts on the safety and interchangeability of biosimilars, especially monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and fusion proteins.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to analyse the short- and long-term safety and interchangeability data of biosimilar mAbs and fusion proteins to provide unbiased information to prescribers and policy makers.

Methods

Data on the safety, immunogenicity and interchangeability of EU-licensed mAbs and fusion proteins were examined using European Public Assessment Reports (EPARs) and postmarketing safety surveillance reports from the European Medicines Agency (EMA). As recent biosimilar approvals allow self-administration by patients by the subcutaneous route, the administration devices were also analyzed.

Results

Prelicensing data of EPARs (six different biosimilar adalimumabs, three infliximabs, three etanercepts, three rituximabs, two bevacizumabs, and six trastuzumabs) revealed that the frequency of fatal treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), TEAEs leading to discontinuation of treatment, serious adverse events (SAEs), and main immune-mediated adverse events (AEs) were comparable between the biosimilars and their reference products. The availability of new biosimilar presentations and administration devices may add to patient choice and be an emerging factor in the decision to switch patients. Analysis of postmarketing surveillance data covering up to 7 years of follow-up did not reveal any biosimilar-specific adverse effects. No product was withdrawn for safety reasons. This is in spite of considerable exposure to biosimilars in treatment-naïve patients and in patients switched from the reference medicinal product to the biosimilar. Analysis of data from switching studies provided in regulatory submissions showed that single or multiple switches between the originator and its biosimilar versions had no negative impact on efficacy, safety or immunogenicity.

Conclusions

In line with previous reports of prelicensing studies of biosimilar mAbs and etanercepts, this study demonstrated comparable efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity compared with the reference products. This is the first study to comprehensively analyze postmarketing surveillance data of the biosimilar mAbs and etanercept. An analysis of more than 1 million patient-treatment years of safety data raised no safety concerns. Based on these data, we argue that biosimilars approved in the EU are highly similar to and interchangeable with their reference products. Thus, additional systematic switch studies are not required to support the switching of patients.

SUBMITTER: Kurki P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8578115 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Alveolar Rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS) is an aggressive pediatric cancer with about 80% of cases characterized by either a t(1;13)(p36;q14) or t(2;13)(q35;q14), which results in the formation of the fusion oncogenes PAX7-FOXO1 and PAX3-FOXO1, respectively. Since patients with fusion-positive ARMS (FP-RMS) have a poor prognosis and are treated with an aggressive therapeutic regimen, correct classification is of clinical importance. Detection of the translocation by different molecular methods is used for diagnostics, including fluorescence in situ hybridization and RT-PCR or NGS based approaches. Since these methods are complex and time consuming, we developed specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) directed to the junction region on the PAX3-FOXO1 fusion protein. Two mAbs, PFM.1 and PFM.2, were developed and able to immunoprecipitate in vitro-translated PAX3-FOXO1 and cellular PAX3-FOXO1 from FP-RMS cells. Furthermore, the mAbs recognized a 105 kDa band in PAX3-FOXO1-transfected cells and in FP-RMS cell lines. The mAbs did not recognize proteins in fusion-negative embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma cell lines, nor did they recognize PAX3 or FOXO1 alone when compared to anti-PAX3 and anti-FOXO1 antibodies. We next evaluated the ability of mAb PFM.2 to detect the fusion protein by immunohistochemistry. Both PAX3-FOXO1 and PAX7-FOXO1 were detected in HEK293 cells transfected with the corresponding cDNAs. Subsequently, we stained 26 primary tumor sections and a rhabdomyosarcoma tissue array and detected both fusion proteins with a positive predictive value of 100%, negative predictive value of 98%, specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 91%. While tumors are stained homogenously in PAX3-FOXO1 cases, the staining pattern is heterogenous with scattered positive cells only in tumors expressing PAX7-FOXO1. No staining was observed in stromal cells, embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma, and fusion-negative rhabdomyosarcoma. These results demonstrate that mAbs specific for the chimeric oncoproteins PAX3-FOXO1 and PAX7-FOXO1 can be used efficiently for simple and fast subclassification of rhabdomyosarcoma in routine diagnostics via immunohistochemical detection.