Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Sustainability Assessment of Combined Animal Fodder and Fuel Production from Microalgal Biomass.


ABSTRACT: We present a comparative environmental and social life cycle assessment (ELCA and SLCA) of algal fuel and fodder co-production (AF + fodder) versus algal fuel and energy co-production (AF + energy). Our ELCA results indicate that fodder co-production offers an advantage in the following categories: climate change (biogenic land use and land use change total), ecotoxicity, marine eutrophication, ionizing radiation, photochemical ozone creation, and land use. By contrast, the AF + energy system yields lower impacts in the other 11 out of 19 Environmental Footprint impact categories. Only AF + fodder offers greenhouse gas reduction compared to petroleum diesel (-25%). Our SLCA results indicate that AF + fodder yields lower impacts in the following categories: fair salaries, forced labor, gender wage gap, health expenditure, unemployment, and violation of employment laws and regulations. AF + energy performs favorably in the other three out of nine social indicators. We conclude that the choice of co-products has a strong influence on the sustainability of algal fuel production. Despite this, none of the compared systems are found to yield a consistent advantage in the environmental or social dimension. It is, therefore, not possible to recommend a co-production strategy without weighing environmental and social issues.

SUBMITTER: Portner BW 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8583398 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC3693881 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8091788 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6370833 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6687806 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6999223 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6467878 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7369025 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6435210 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4108913 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC7433847 | biostudies-literature