Dataset Information

Real-World Analysis of Treatment Patterns Among Hospitalized Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Hospitalization is an important clinical factor associated with survival and rehospitalization in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Thus, this study examined treatment patterns before and after hospitalization in the US-specific population.

Methods

Adult PAH patients in the United States were identified using the Optum^® Clinformatics^® database from January 1, 2014, to June 30, 2019, and were required to have continuous health plan enrollment for at least 6 months prior to the first (index) hospitalization through at least 90 days post-discharge. Baseline patient characteristics were evaluated from 6 months prior to through the index hospitalization. PAH treatment patterns were examined from 30 days pre-index admission (pre-hospitalization) and 90 days post-index hospital discharge (post-hospitalization), and stratified by therapy type: monotherapy, double- or triple-combination therapy, or no PAH therapy.

Results

A total of 3116 hospitalized patients with PAH met selection criteria. The mean age and Charlson comorbidity index score were 68.1 years and 5.1, respectively. In the pre- and post-hospitalization periods (all-cause), respectively, patients prescribed monotherapy were most common (from 64.8% pre- to 51.9% post-hospitalization), followed by patients with no evidence of PAH therapy (from 14.6 to 28.5%). Among PAH-related hospitalizations, patients with monotherapy were also most common (from 60.8% pre- to 49.1% post-hospitalization), followed by patients with no evidence of PAH therapy (from 10.0 to 22.8%). The majority of patients with all-cause hospitalizations (72.8%) had no therapy modification; 20.0% de-escalated therapy (including 15.0% from monotherapy to no therapy) and 6.1% escalated therapy (including 2.2% from no therapy to monotherapy and 3.2% from monotherapy to double or triple therapy).

Conclusion

Inpatient admissions did not appear to drive changes in PAH therapy management, as monotherapy predominated, and most patients had no therapy modification within 90 days of a hospitalization. These results warrant future research to understand the reasons behind the limited treatment intensification observed and the impact of post-hospitalization optimization on clinical and economic outcomes.

SUBMITTER: Ogbomo A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8589935 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionRisk assessment can aid management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and clinical decision-making. This analysis describes characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with PAH, categorised by risk status at time of treatment escalation with selexipag in clinical settings.MethodsPatients initiating selexipag in the ongoing multicentre, prospective EXPOSURE (EUPAS19085) study were grouped as low, intermediate-low, intermediate-high or high risk of 1-year mortality according to the ESC/ERS 4-strata method.ResultsAs of November 2022, 77% (535/698) of patients initiating selexipag had data allowing for risk calculation; 14% (N = 76) were low, 31% (N = 168) intermediate-low, 34% (N = 182) intermediate-high and 20% (N = 109) high risk of 1-year mortality. Overall, patients were predominantly female (71%), with idiopathic/heritable PAH (56%) or PAH associated with connective tissue disease (CTD-PAH; 27%), median age of 60 years and prevalent (2 years) disease. From low to high risk, proportion of CTD-PAH and age increased (from 12%-40% and 46-68 years, respectively); time from diagnosis decreased and presence of cardiovascular risk factors increased. Most patients across risk groups (74-81%) initiated selexipag as part of triple oral combination therapy. Overall median (Q1, Q3) selexipag exposure duration was 10.1 (3.5, 24.1) months. Proportions of hospitalised patients increased with increasing risk group (16-42% from low to high, respectively); more hospitalisations were PAH-related for the high risk (71%) versus other risk groups (47-54%). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were 98%, 98%, 93% and 80% at 1-year and 98%, 92%, 81% and 67% at 2-years, from low to high risk, respectively.ConclusionsIn clinical settings, selexipag is initiated across all risk groups, predominantly as triple therapy. Only 45% of patients being at low/intermediate-low risk at selexipag initiation suggests an opportunity for more frequent patient monitoring and earlier treatment escalation, given that 4-strata risk assessment was prognostic for hospitalisations and survival in this contemporary PAH cohort. A graphical abstract is available with this article.

Project description:Background: Although medical guidelines discourage the use of methylxanthines in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD), they are still widely used in clinical practice. This study investigated the real-world use of methylxanthines in the management of AECOPD. Methods: Patient data from the Acute exacerbation of Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Using REgistry data (ACURE, NCT02657525) study database were screened. Enrolled patients were divided into treatment and control groups. Propensity score (PS) matching and Cox regression analyses were used to minimize confounding factors and determine the association between methylxanthine treatment and the length of stay (LOS). Results: Among the 2088 eligible patients, 1,563 (74.9%) were in the methylxanthine treatment group. Patients treated with methylxanthines had more severe respiratory symptoms and worse lung function than those in the control group. Doxophylline was the most commonly used methylxanthine in both secondary and tertiary hospitals. After PS matching, 966 patients were equally divided into two groups. The LOS of patients in the two groups was similar [median: 8 days, interquartile range (IQR): 7-11 days, p = 0.730]. Patients in the treatment group (median: 8, IQR: 4-12) had a more significant decrease in the COPD Assessment Test score from admission to discharge than those in the control group (median: 6, IQR: 2-10, p < 0.001). Among all matched patients, the LOS was not significantly associated with methylxanthine treatment [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 1.02, 95% confidence intervals (CIs): 0.89-1.16]. However, in the subgroup analysis, methylxanthines were significantly associated with a short LOS in patients with blood eosinophil count >4% (adjusted HR: 1.56, 95% CIs: 1.12-2.17). Conclusion: This study revealed that methylxanthines, especially doxophylline, are widely used in China. Methylxanthines were effective in improving symptoms in AECOPD patients. Higher blood eosinophil count may be associated with a better efficacy of methylxanthine treatment.