Dataset Information

Clinicopathological and prognostic implications of ALK rearrangement in patients with completely surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The prognostic significance of ALK rearrangement is still contradictory. Here, we aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of lung adenocarcinoma patients with ALK rearrangement, and analyze whether these patients benefited from targeted therapy.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study of 80 ALK-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma patients who had undergone radical surgery and another 3031 ALK mutation-negative patients were retrospectively reviewed for inclusion in this case-controlled analyses. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated using the Kaplan--Meier method. Univariate analysis (UVA) and multivariate analysis (MVA) by the Cox proportional hazards regression identified risk factors that predicted OS.

Results

Compared to ALK-negative patients, the ALK rearranged patients were younger, with more non-smokers, more females, a larger primary tumor was demonstrated, and were a higher pathological stage. In particular, the risk of lymph node metastasis was higher. For patients with surgically-resected tumors, the prognosis was better for ALK rearranged patients (HR = 0.503; 95% CI: 0.259-0.974, p = 0.041). In addition, for stage II-III patients, targeted therapy was an independent prognostic factor of better OS (HR = 0.159; 95% CI: 0.032-0.801, p = 0.026).

Conclusions

ALK rearranged lung adenocarcinoma patients who have undergone radical surgery have distinct clinical features. Patients with ALK rearrangement may have a favorable prognosis, and stage II-III patients may benefit from targeted treatment.

SUBMITTER: Zhang H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8590901 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:A number of mutations in key oncogenes have been identified as important for the initiation and maintenance of lung adenocarcinoma (LAC). This study elucidated the prevalence and prognostic significance of mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) and rearrangements in the anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene (ALK) in patients with surgically resected primary LAC. PATIENTS AND METHODS:We retrospectively analyzed 675 consecutive patients who underwent radical resection at a single institution. We concurrently analyzed mutations in EGFR and the Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog gene (KRAS) by reverse transcription (RT)-PCR, and investigated ALK rearrangements by immunohistochemistry. LAC with or without various oncogenic mutations was studied for clinicopathological features and their association with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULT:ALK rearrangements and EGFR mutations were detected in 75 and 312 patients, respectively, with coexistence in 5 cases. ALK rearrangements and mutations in EGFR and KRAS were mutually exclusive. Compared with patients with EGFR mutations, ALK rearrangements were more common in younger patients, and those with advanced tumors, lymph node metastases, and higher rates of postoperative adjuvant therapy. Histologically, EGFR mutations were more common than ALK rearrangements in patients with the acinar predominant subtype and the lepidic predominant subtype of LAC, whereas ALK rearrangements were more frequent in the solid predominant subtype with mucin production and invasive mucinous adenocarcinomas. ALK-positive patients had a significantly worse DFS than those with EGFR mutations and wild-type (WT) patients. The mean OS after surgical procedures was significantly longer in EGFR-mutated versus WT patients. No significant differences were found in patients with ALK-positive tumors compared with EGFR-mutated and WT patients. CONCLUSION:Clinicopathological features of LAC with ALK rearrangements differ from those of LAC with EGFR mutations. Patients with ALK rearrangements had a significantly worse DFS than those harboring EGFR mutations. Thus, ALK rearrangements are an adverse prognostic factor in surgically-resected LAC patients, while EGFR mutations are associated with a better prognosis.

Project description:Background Lymph node involvement is one of the important prognostic factors for early-stage lung cancer. However, in lymph node-negative (N0) lung cancer the recurrent rate may be as high as 30%. We aimed to study potential prognostic factors including clinicopathological factors and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status in this lung cancer population. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and pathological examinations of patients with completely resected N0 pulmonary adenocarcinoma treated in our institute between 2009 and 2016. We used Cobas® test to determine EGFR mutation status. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was analyzed by univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses. Results We recruited 220 patients with median duration of follow up 5 years. Majority of these patients were in stage I (80%) and did not receive adjuvant therapy (86%). There were 53% with EGFR mutations which comprised of exon 19 deletion 51% and L858R 43%. Recurrence occurred in 64 out of 220 patients (29%). The median time to recurrence was 2.1 years. Statistically significant prognostic factors in both univariate and multivariate analyses included tumor size ≥4 centimeter (cm) (HR: 1.94; 95% CI: 1.03–3.67), visceral pleural invasion (HR: 2.53; 95% CI: 1.34–4.79), tumor necrosis (HR: 2.45; 95% CI: 1.13–5.31) and bronchial resection margin <2 cm (HR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.10–3.51). However, presence of sensitizing EGFR mutation was not found to be a significant prognostic factor (HR: 1.20; 95% CI: 0.66–2.18; P=0.56). Conclusions In N0 surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma, there were significant pathological prognostic factors including tumor 4 cm or more, visceral pleural invasion, tumor necrosis and bronchial resection margin less than 2 cm. Mutation of EGFR is not a significant prognostic factor to determine the risk of recurrence in this population and their risks shall be determined by the other poor prognostic factors.