Dataset Information

Wall Stress Distribution in Bicuspid Aortic Valve-Associated Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Bicuspid aortic valve-associated ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms (BAV-aTAAs) carry a risk of acute type A dissection. Biomechanically, dissection may occur when wall stress exceeds wall strength. Our aim was to develop patient-specific computational models of BAV-aTAAs to determine magnitudes of wall stress by anatomic regions.

Methods

Patients with BAV-aTAA diameter greater than 4.5 cm (n = 41) underwent electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography angiography. Three-dimensional aneurysm geometries were reconstructed after accounting for prestress and loaded to systemic pressure. Finite element analyses were performed with fiber-embedded hyperelastic material model using LS-DYNA software (LSTC Inc, Livermore, CA) to obtain wall stress distributions. The 99th percentile longitudinal and circumferential stresses were determined at systole.

Results

The 99th percentile longitudinal wall stresses for BAV-aTAAs at sinuses of Valsalva, sinotubular junction (STJ), and ascending aorta were 361 ± 59.8 kPa, 295 ± 67.2 kPa, and 224 ± 37.6 kPa, respectively, with significant differences in ascending aorta vs sinuses (P< 1 × 10^-13) and STJ (P < 1 × 10^-6). The 99th percentile circumferential wall stresses were 474 ± 88.2 kPa, 634 ± 181.9 kPa, and 381 ± 54.0 kPa for sinuses, the STJ, and the ascending aorta, respectively, with significant differences in the ascending aorta vs sinuses (P = .002) and STJ (P < 1 × 10^-13).

Conclusions

Wall stresses, both circumferential and longitudinal, were greater in the aortic root, sinuses, and STJ than in the ascending aorta on BAV-aTAAs. These results fill a fundamental knowledge gap regarding biomechanical stress distribution in BAV-aTAA patients, which when related to wall strength may provide prognostication of aTAA dissection risk by patient-specific modeling.

SUBMITTER: Gomez A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8598319 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveGuidelines for repair of bicuspid aortic valve-associated ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms have been changing, most recently to the same criteria as tricuspid aortic valve-ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms. Rupture/dissection occurs when wall stress exceeds wall strength. Recent studies suggest similar strength of bicuspid aortic valve versus tricuspid aortic valve-ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms; thus, comparative wall stress may better predict dissection in bicuspid aortic valve versus tricuspid aortic valve-ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms. Our aim was to determine whether bicuspid aortic valve-ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms had higher wall stresses than their tricuspid aortic valve counterparts.MethodsPatients with bicuspid aortic valve- and tricuspid aortic valve-ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms (bicuspid aortic valve = 17, tricuspid aortic valve = 19) greater than 4.5 cm underwent electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography angiography. Patient-specific 3-dimensional geometry was reconstructed and loaded to systemic pressure after accounting for prestress geometry. Finite element analyses were performed using the LS-DYNA solver (LSTC Inc, Livermore, Calif) with user-defined fiber-embedded material model to determine ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm wall stress.ResultsBicuspid aortic valve-ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms 99th-percentile longitudinal stresses were 280 kPa versus 242 kPa (P = .028) for tricuspid aortic valve-ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms in systole. These stresses did not correlate to diameter for bicuspid aortic valve-ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms (r = -0.004) but had better correlation to tricuspid aortic valve-ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms diameter (r = 0.677). Longitudinal stresses on sinotubular junction were significantly higher in bicuspid aortic valve-ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms than in tricuspid aortic valve-ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms (405 vs 329 kPa, P = .023). Bicuspid aortic valve-ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm 99th-percentile circumferential stresses were 548 kPa versus 462 kPa (P = .033) for tricuspid aortic valve-ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms, which also did not correlate to bicuspid aortic valve-ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm diameter (r = 0.007).ConclusionsCircumferential and longitudinal stresses were greater in bicuspid aortic valve- than tricuspid aortic valve-ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms and were more pronounced in the sinotubular junction. Peak wall stress did not correlate with bicuspid aortic valve-ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm diameter, suggesting diameter alone in this population may be a poor predictor of dissection risk. Our results highlight the need for patient-specific aneurysm wall stress analysis for accurate dissection risk prediction.

Project description:OBJECTIVES:The objectives of this study were to investigate an association between the magnitude of flow-mediated aortic wall shear stress (WSS) and medial wall histopathology in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) with aortopathy. METHODS:Patients with BAV (n = 27; 52 ± 15 years; 3 women; proximal thoracic aorta diameter = 4.4 ± 0.7 and 4.6 ± 0.5 cm) who underwent prophylactic aortic resection received preoperative 3-dimensional time-resolved phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging with 3-dimensional velocity encoding to quantify WSS relative to a population of healthy age- and sex-matched tricuspid aortic valve control participants (n = 20). Quantitative histopathology was conducted on BAV aorta tissue samples resected at surgery (n = 93), and correlation was performed between elastic fiber thickness and in vivo aortic WSS as continuous variables. Validation of elastic fiber thickness was achieved by correlation relative to tissue stiffness determined using biaxial biomechanical testing (n = 22 samples). RESULTS:Elastic fibers were thinner and WSS was higher along the greater curvature compared with other circumferential regions (vs anterior wall: P = .003 and P = .0001, respectively; lesser curvature: both P = .001). Increased regional WSS was associated with decreased elastic fiber thickness (r = -0.25; P = .02). Patient stratification with subanalysis showed an increase in the correlation between WSS and histopathology with aortic valve stenosis (r = -0.36; P = .002) and smaller aortic diameters (<4.5 cm: r = -0.39; P = .03). Elastic fiber thinning was associated with circumferential stiffness (r = -0.41; P = .06). CONCLUSIONS:For patients with BAV, increased aortic valve-mediated WSS is significantly associated with elastic fiber thinning, particularly with aortic valve stenosis and in earlier stages of aortopathy. Elastic fiber thinning correlates with impaired tissue biomechanics. These novel findings further implicate valve-mediated hemodynamics in the progression of BAV aortopathy.