Dataset Information

Population-based Trends in Obesity and Kidney Transplantation Among Patients With End-stage Kidney Disease.

ABSTRACT: Obesity is a barrier to transplant, reducing access and leading to worse outcomes versus nonobese adults. Most transplant centers in the United States maintain body mass index (BMI) cutoffs to listing for kidney transplantation of 35 to 40 kg/m². There is little contemporary data on the prevalence of obesity among patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) despite its impact on clinical outcomes and healthcare expenditures.

Methods

We utilized data from the US Renal Data System from 2008 to 2016 to identify a prevalent cohort of 1 079 410 patients with ESKD. Linear regression determined trends in the proportion of patients within each category of BMI. We also evaluated geographic variation in rates of obesity and transplantation across the United States.

Results

Among the 1 079 410 ESKD patients, the largest cohort of patients were those with obesity (n = 423 270; 39.2%). There were 309 707 (28.7%) patients with an overweight BMI and 274 683 (25.4%) with a normal BMI. The proportion of patients with obesity increased significantly from 36.8% in 2008 to 40.2% in 2016 (trend 0.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.51). There was significant geographic variation by state with rates of obesity ranging from 32.3% to 45.4% and state transplant rates among those obese patients ranging from 22.5% to 46.8%. There is a weak correlation between states with increased rates of obese ESKD patients and states with an increased obesity transplant rate as indicated with r = 0.40 (P = 0.003).

Conclusions

Beneficiaries with obesity are now the largest and fastest growing demographic among patients with ESKD in the United States.

SUBMITTER: Wakam GK

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8601267 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveFor the majority of patients with lupus nephritis-related end-stage kidney disease (LN-ESKD), kidney transplant is associated with better outcomes than dialysis. Access to kidney transplant requires an initial referral to a transplant center and medical evaluation prior to waitlisting. The study's objective was to examine access to these early steps in the kidney transplant process among patients with LN-ESKD.MethodsAdults who began treatment for ESKD in the Southeast, Northeast, New York, or Ohio River Valley U.S. regions from 1/1/2012 to 12/31/2019, followed through 6/30/2021, were identified from the United States Renal Data System. Referral and evaluation start data were collected from 28 of 48 transplant centers across these regions. The exposure was primary cause of ESKD (LN-ESKD vs other-ESKD). The outcomes were referral and evaluation start at a transplant center. Cox models quantified the association between LN-ESKD (vs other-ESKD) and referral and evaluation start.ResultsAmong 192,318 patients initiating treatment for ESKD, 0.4% had LN-ESKD. Over half (58%) of LN-ESKD patients were referred before study end, and among those referred, 66% started the evaluation. In adjusted analyses, patients with LN-ESKD were referred (HR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.19) and started the transplant evaluation (HR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.28) at a higher rate than patients with other-ESKD. Among referred patients with LN-ESKD, the median time from ESKD start to referral was 2.9 months (IQR: <1 to 11.7 months), which is similar to patients with other-ESKD (median 2.6 months, IQR: <1 to 8.8 months).ConclusionsAmong incident patients with ESKD, having a primary diagnosis of LN-ESKD versus other-ESKD is associated with higher rates of early transplant access outcomes. Despite this, patients with LN-ESKD (vs other-ESKD) are less likely to be preemptively referred (i.e., referred prior to ESKD start) for kidney transplant. While providers may no longer be delaying the early steps in the kidney transplantation process among this patient population, there is still room for improvement in the rates of preemptive referral. Access to kidney transplant referral prior to ESKD could result in increased transplant rates and better transplant outcomes for patients with LN-ESKD.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Cardiovascular disease is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and kidney transplant (KT) patients. Compared with left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF), LV strain has emerged as an important marker of LV function as it is less load dependent. We sought to evaluate changes in LV strain using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in ESRD patients who received KT, to determine whether KT may improve LV function. METHODS:We conducted a prospective multi-centre longitudinal study of 79 ESRD patients (40 on dialysis, 39 underwent KT). CMR was performed at baseline and at 12?months after KT. RESULTS:Among 79 participants (mean age 55 years; 30% women), KT patients had significant improvement in global circumferential strain (GCS) (p?=?0.007) and global radial strain (GRS) (p?=?0.003), but a decline in global longitudinal strain (GLS) over 12?months (p?=?0.026), while no significant change in any LV strain was observed in the ongoing dialysis group. For KT patients, the improvement in LV strain paralleled improvement in LVEF (57.4?±?6.4% at baseline, 60.6%?±?6.9% at 12?months; p?=?0.001). For entire cohort, over 12?months, change in LVEF was significantly correlated with change in GCS (Spearman's r?=?-?0.42, p?<?0.001), GRS (Spearman's r?=?0.64, p?<?0.001), and GLS (Spearman's r?=?-?0.34, p?=?0.002). Improvements in GCS and GRS over 12?months were significantly correlated with reductions in LV end-diastolic volume index and LV end-systolic volume index (all p?<?0.05), but not with change in blood pressure (all p?>?0.10). CONCLUSIONS:Compared with continuation of dialysis, KT was associated with significant improvements in LV strain metrics of GCS and GRS after 12?months, which did not correlate with blood pressure change. This supports the notion that KT has favorable effects on LV function beyond volume and blood pessure control. Larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm these findings.

Project description:ImportanceDialysis facilities in the United States are required to educate patients with end-stage renal disease about all treatment options, including kidney transplantation. Patients receiving dialysis typically require a referral for kidney transplant evaluation at a transplant center from a dialysis facility to start the transplantation process, but the proportion of patients referred for transplantation is unknown.ObjectiveTo describe variation in dialysis facility-level referral for kidney transplant evaluation and factors associated with referral among patients initiating dialysis in Georgia, the US state with the lowest kidney transplantation rates.Design, setting, and participantsExamination of United States Renal Data System data from a cohort of 15,279 incident, adult (18-69 years) patients with end-stage renal disease from 308 Georgia dialysis facilities from January 2005 to September 2011, followed up through September 2012, linked to kidney transplant referral data collected from adult transplant centers in Georgia in the same period.Main outcomes and measuresReferral for kidney transplant evaluation within 1 year of starting dialysis at any of the 3 Georgia transplant centers was the primary outcome; placement on the deceased donor waiting list was also examined.ResultsThe median within-facility percentage of patients referred within 1 year of starting dialysis was 24.4% (interquartile range, 16.7%-33.3%) and varied from 0% to 75.0%. Facilities in the lowest tertile of referral (<19.2%) were more likely to treat patients living in high-poverty neighborhoods (absolute difference, 21.8% [95% CI, 14.1%-29.4%]), had a higher patient to social worker ratio (difference, 22.5 [95% CI, 9.7-35.2]), and were more likely nonprofit (difference, 17.6% [95% CI, 7.7%-27.4%]) compared with facilities in the highest tertile of referral (>31.3%). In multivariable, multilevel analyses, factors associated with lower referral for transplantation, such as older age, white race, and nonprofit facility status, were not always consistent with the factors associated with lower waitlisting.Conclusions and relevanceIn Georgia overall, a limited proportion of patients treated with dialysis were referred for kidney transplant evaluation between 2005 and 2011, but there was substantial variability in referral among facilities. Variables associated with referral were not always associated with waitlisting, suggesting that different factors may account for disparities in referral.