Dataset Information

Haematotoxicity during peptide receptor radionuclide therapy: Baseline parameters differences and effect on patient’s therapy course

ABSTRACT:

Background

Mainly severe (CTCAE grade 3–4) haematotoxicity during peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is reported in literature due to major clinical impact, however moderate (CTCAE grade 2) haematotoxicity is common and could affect therapy management. The aim of this study was to evaluate the haematotoxicity course during PRRT and to compare baseline parameters between haematotoxicity grades.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 100 patients with a neuroendocrine tumour treated with PRRT were included. Patients were treated with an aimed number of four cycles with 7.4 GBq [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE administered every 10 weeks. Haematological assessment was performed at baseline and frequently up to 10 weeks after the fourth cycle. The lowest haematological value was graded according to CTCAE v5.0, and patients were classified using the highest observed grade. Differences in baseline parameters, including [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE positive tumour volume, were evaluated between CTCAE grades.

Results

Four cycles were completed by 86/100 of patients, 4/100 patients discontinued due to haematotoxicity, and 10/100 patients due to progressive disease. The treatment course was adjusted due to haematotoxicity in 24/100 patients, including postponed next cycle (n = 17), reduced administered activity (n = 13), and both adjustments (n = 10). The most observed haematotoxicity grade was grade 0–1 in 54/100 patients, grade 2 in 38/100 and grade 3–4 in 8/100. Significant differences in baseline leucocyte, neutrophil and platelet counts were observed between grade 0–1 and grade 2. However, the correlation between baseline and lowest observed values was poor to moderate. No differences between haematotoxicity grades and baseline parameters or somatostatin receptor positive tumour volume was observed.

Conclusions

The incidence of severe haematotoxicity was low with extensive screening and monitoring. The vast majority of patients (96/100) was not restricted in treatment continuation by haematotoxicity; therefore, our selection criteria appeared appropriate for safe PRRT treatment. Baseline parameters showed limited correlation with the degree of decline in haematological values.

SUBMITTER: de Vries–Huizing D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8601524 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Pretherapy PET with 86Y-DOTATOC is considered the ideal dosimetry protocol for 90Y-DOTATOC therapy; however, its cost, limited availability, and need for infusion of amino acids to mimic the therapy administration limit its use in the clinical setting. The goal of this study was to develop a dosimetric method for 90Y-DOTATOC using 90Y-DOTATOC PET/CT and bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT and to determine whether dosimetry-based administered activities differ significantly from standard administered activities. Methods: This was a prospective phase 2 trial of 90Y-DOTATOC therapy in patients with somatostatin receptor-positive tumors. 90Y-DOTATOC was given in 3 cycles 6-8 wk apart. In the first cycle of therapy, adults received 4.4 GBq and children received 1.85 GBq/m2; the subsequent administered activities were adjusted according to the dosimetry of the preceding cycle so as not to exceed a total kidney dose of 23 Gy and bone marrow dose of 2 Gy. The radiation dose to the kidneys was determined from serial imaging sessions consisting of time-of-flight 90Y-DOTATOC PET/CT at 5 h after therapy and 90Y-DOTATOC bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT at 6, 24, 48, and 72 h. The PET/CT data were used to measure the absolute concentration of 90Y-DOTATOC and to calibrate the bremsstrahlung SPECT kidney clearance data. The radiation dose to the kidneys was determined by multiplying the time-integrated activity (from the fitted biexponential curve of renal clearance of 90Y-DOTATOC) with the energy emitted per decay, divided by the mass of the kidneys. Results: The radiation dose to the kidneys per cycle of 90Y-DOTATOC therapy was highly variable among patients, ranging from 0.32 to 3.0 mGy/MBq. In 17 (85%) of the 20 adult patients who received the second and the third treatment cycles of 90Y-DOTATOC, the administered activity was modified by at least 20% from the starting administered activity. Conclusion: Renal dosimetry of 90Y-DOTATOC is feasible using 90Y-DOTATOC time-of-flight PET/CT and bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT and has a significant impact on the administered activity in treatment cycles.

Project description:Abstract Background: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a relatively novel, emerging therapy for the treatment of metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL). Lutetium 177 (177Lu)-DOTATATE (Lutathera ®) is a form of PRRT that is currently being evaluated for its treatment efficacy in metastatic PPGL. It acts by binding to somatostatin receptors 2 (SSTR2) which are present on PPGL and other tissues of neuroendocrine origin. Although subclinical thyroid dysfunction has been previously noted, development of clinical hypothyroidism post 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy has not been reported to date. Case: A 29-year-old male with Beckwith-Weidemann syndrome and metastatic, succinate dehydrogenase subunit B (SDHB) germline mutation-positive paraganglioma with normal metanephrines was enrolled at our center under the 177Lu-DOTATATE trial for the treatment of inoperable, metastatic PPGL (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03206060). Prior to the first cycle of therapy, the patient underwent endocrine evaluation per protocol. He was noted to have suppressed thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) of <0.01 mcIU/mL (normal: 0.27 - 4.2 mcIU/mL), and a normal free thyroxine (FT4) of 1.3 ng/dL (0.9 - 1.7 ng/dL), indicating subclinical hyperthyroidism. Thyroid auto-antibodies were not measured at that time point. The patient denied symptoms of hyper- or hypothyroidism. On physical examination, there was no thyromegaly or cervical lymphadenopathy. Serial monitoring of thyroid function tests (TFTs) was pursued. One month after the first cycle of 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy, the patient complained of new onset fatigue and weight gain. The TSH had markedly increased (73.04 mcIU/mL), along with a reduction in FT4 levels (0.3 mg/dL). Mass spectrometry measures revealed a low total T4 (1.3 ng/dL; 4.9 - 10.5 ng/dL), and a low total T3 (57 ng/dL; 87 - 169 ng/dL). Thyroid peroxidase antibodies were >1000 IU/mL (0.0 - 34.9 IU/mL), and anti-thyroglobulin antibodies were 668 IU/mL (0.0-40.0 IU/mL). Weight-based levothyroxine therapy was initiated and the follow-up TFTs normalized. The baseline diagnostic Gallium 68-DOTATATE scan performed prior to PRRT demonstrated an increased diffuse uptake in the entire thyroid gland (maximum standardized uptake value: 14.3) and post-treatment SPECT-CT scan revealed similar increased, diffuse 177Lu-DOTATATE uptake in the thyroid gland. The patient currently has stable metastatic disease and continues to be under 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy. Conclusion: We report the first known case of clinical hypothyroidism post 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy in a patient who likely had subclinical hyperthyroidism prior to treatment. The possible mechanism was development of thyroiditis. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the mechanisms of PRRT-induced endocrine abnormalities and their clinical implications.