Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Fooled twice: People cannot detect deepfakes but think they can


ABSTRACT: Summary Hyper-realistic manipulations of audio-visual content, i.e., deepfakes, present new challenges for establishing the veracity of online content. Research on the human impact of deepfakes remains sparse. In a pre-registered behavioral experiment (N = 210), we show that (1) people cannot reliably detect deepfakes and (2) neither raising awareness nor introducing financial incentives improves their detection accuracy. Zeroing in on the underlying cognitive processes, we find that (3) people are biased toward mistaking deepfakes as authentic videos (rather than vice versa) and (4) they overestimate their own detection abilities. Together, these results suggest that people adopt a “seeing-is-believing” heuristic for deepfake detection while being overconfident in their (low) detection abilities. The combination renders people particularly susceptible to be influenced by deepfake content. Graphical abstract Highlights • People cannot reliably detect deepfakes• Raising awareness and financial incentives do not improve people's detection accuracy• People tend to mistake deepfakes as authentic videos (rather than vice versa)• People overestimate their own detection deepfake abilities Neuroscience; Behavioral neuroscience; Cognitive neuroscience; Artificial intelligence; Artificial intelligence applications; Social sciences; Psychology

SUBMITTER: Kobis N 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8602050 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC10395974 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8464160 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9869423 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6070576 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6310859 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC5501992 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10501943 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6949424 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4651752 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9298710 | biostudies-literature