Atrioventricular nodal ablation and left bundle branch pacing for treatment of refractory atrial fibrillation post alcohol septal ablation for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Gallen R
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8602116 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:His bundle pacing (HBP) can reverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling in patients with right ventricular (RV) pacing-induced cardimyopathy (PICM) but may be unable to correct infranodal atrioventricular block (AVB). Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) results in rapid LV activation and may be able to reliably pace beyond the site of AVB. Our study was conducted to assess the feasibility, safety, and outcomes of permanent LBBP in infranodal AVB and PICM patients. Patients with infranodal AVB and PICM who underwent LBBP for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) were included. Clinical evaluation and echocardiographic and electrocardiographic assessments were recorded at baseline and follow-up. Permanent LBBP upgrade was successful in 19 of 20 patients with a median follow-up duration of 12 months. QRS duration (QRSd) increased from 139.3 ± 28.0 ms at baseline to 176.2 ± 21.4 ms (P < 0.001) with right ventricular pacing (RVP) and was shortened to 120.9 ± 15.2 ms after LBBP (P < 0.001). The mean LBBP threshold was 0.7 ± 0.3 V at 0.4 ms at implant and remained stable during follow-up. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increased from 36.3% ± 6.5% to 51.9% ± 13.0% (P < 0.001) with left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) reduced from 180.1 ± 43.5 to 136.8 ± 36.7 ml (P < 0.001) during last follow-up. LBBP paced beyond the site of block, which results in a low pacing threshold with a high success rate in infranodal AVB patients. LBBP improved LV function with stable parameters over the 12 months, making it a reasonable alternative to cardiac resynchronization pacing via a coronary sinus lead in infranodal AVB and PICM patients.
| S-EPMC8236829 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAlthough right ventricular pacing (RVP) is recommended by most of the guidelines for atrioventricular block, it can cause electrical and mechanical desynchrony, impair left ventricular function, and increase the risk of atrial fibrillation. Recently, the His-Purkinje system pacing, including His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch pacing (LBBP), has emerged as a physiological pacing modality. However, few studies have compared their efficacy and safety in atrioventricular block (AVB).Methods and resultsThe PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ScienceDirect databases were searched for observational studies and randomized trials of patients with atrioventricular block requiring permanent pacing, from database inception until 10 January 2022. The primary outcomes were complications and heart failure hospitalization. The secondary outcomes included changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), pacing parameters, procedure duration, and success rate. After extracting the data at baseline and the longest follow-up duration available, a pairwise meta-analysis and a Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis were performed. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) or 95% credible intervals (CrIs) were calculated for dichotomous outcomes, whereas mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs or 95% CrIs were calculated for continuous outcomes. Seven studies and 1,069 patients were included. Overall, 43.4% underwent LBBP, 33.5% HBP, and 23.1% RVP. Compared with RVP, LBBP and HBP were associated with a shorter paced QRS duration and a more preserved LVEF. HBP significantly increased the pacing threshold and reduced the R-wave amplitude. There was no difference in the risk of complications or the implant success rate. The pacing threshold remained stable during follow-up for the three pacing modalities. The pacing impedance was significantly reduced in HBP, while a numerical but non-significant pacing impedance decrease was observed in both LBBP and RVP. LBBP was associated with an increased R-wave amplitude during follow-up.ConclusionIn this systematic review and network meta-analysis, HBP and LBBP were superior to RVP in paced QRS duration and preservation of LVEF for patients with atrioventricular block. LBBP was associated with a lower pacing threshold and a greater R-wave amplitude than HBP. However, the stability of the pacing output of LBBP may be a concern. Further investigation of the long-term efficacy in left ventricular function and the risk of heart failure hospitalization is needed.Systematic review registration[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=315046], identifier [CRD42022315046].
| S-EPMC9640391 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportancePatients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) and drug-refractory symptoms and outflow gradients have limited nonsurgical treatment options. The feasibility of percutaneous intramyocardial septal radiofrequency ablation (PIMSRA) has been reported previously; however, procedural and medium-term outcomes are unknown.ObjectiveTo describe the safety and medium-term outcomes of PIMSRA in a large patient cohort with drug-refractory HOCM.Design, setting, and participantsThis was a single-arm, open-label study of PIMSRA in patients with drug-refractory HOCM. Patients presenting to the Xijing Hospital in Xi'an, China, between October 2016 to June 2020 with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Of 1314 patients presenting with HOCM, 244 fulfilled inclusion criteria of severe resting/provoked outflow gradients of 50 mm Hg or higher, and symptoms of New York Heart Association functional class of II or higher refractory to maximum tolerated medications. After discussion among the heart team, 40 patients underwent surgical or alcohol septal reduction therapy and 4 required treatment of significant coronary artery disease.InterventionsPIMSRA performed in patients.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was 30-day major adverse clinical events: death, emergency surgery, severe effusion requiring intervention, procedure-related stroke, bleeding, and stroke. Secondary outcomes included 30-day technical success and 90-day improvement in outflow obstruction.ResultsThe mean (SD) age of 200 patients was 46.9 (14.0) years, and 125 (62.5%) were men. Resting or provoked left ventricular outflow tract gradients were 50 mm Hg or higher. The median (IQR) follow-up for all patients was 19 (6-50) months. Thirty-day major adverse clinical events rate was 10.5% (n = 21): there were 2 in-hospital/30-day deaths (1.0%), 7 patients (3.5%) with pericardial effusion requiring mini-thoracotomy, 12 patients (6%) with pericardial effusion requiring pericardiocentesis, and no bleeding or strokes. Other periprocedural complications included permanent right bundle branch block in 5 patients (2.5%), resuscitated ventricular fibrillation in 2 (1.0%), and septal branch aneurysm in 2 (1.0%). There were no permanent pacemaker implantations. At follow-up, maximum septal thickness was reduced from a mean (SD) of 24.0 (5.1) mm to 17.3 (4.4) mm (P < .001), and left ventricular outflow tract gradient was decreased from a mean (SD) of 79.0 (53.0) mm Hg to 14.0 (24.0) mm Hg (P < .001). Overall, 190 patients (96%) with HOCM were in New York Heart Association functional class I or II at last follow-up.Conclusions and relevanceThis study found that PIMSRA in patients with drug-refractory HOCM may be an effective procedure for relief of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and symptoms with acceptable complication rates. These results are encouraging and support the design of a randomized clinical trial against well-established septal reduction therapies.
| S-EPMC9096597 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a novel pacing modality with stable pacing parameters and a narrow-paced QRS duration. We compared heart failure (HF) hospitalization events and echocardiographic measures between LBBAP and right ventricular pacing (RVP) in patients with atrioventricular block (AVB). Methods and Results: This multicenter observational study prospectively recruited consecutive AVB patients requiring ventricular pacing in five centers if they received LBBAP or RVP and had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >50%. Data on electrocardiogram, pacing parameters, echocardiographic measurements, device complications, and clinical outcomes were collected at baseline and during follow-up. The primary outcome was first episode hospitalization for HF or upgrade to biventricular pacing. LBBAP was successful in 235 of 246 patients (95.5%), while 120 patients received RVP. During a mean of 11.4 ± 2.7 months of follow-up, the ventricular pacing burden was comparable (83.9 ± 35.1 vs. 85.7 ± 30.0%), while the mean LVEF differed significantly (62.6 ± 4.6 vs. 57.8 ± 11.4%) between the LBBAP and RVP groups. Patients with LBBAP had significantly lower occurrences of HF hospitalization and upgrading to biventricular pacing than patients with RVP (2.6 vs. 10.8%, P <0.001), and differences in primary outcome between LBBAP and RVP were mainly observed in patients with ventricular pacing >40% or with baseline LVEF <60%. The primary outcome was independently associated with LBBAP (adjusted HR 0.14, 95% CI: 0.04-0.55), previous myocardial infarction (adjusted HR 6.82, 95% CI: 1.23-37.5), and baseline LVEF (adjusted HR 0.91, 95% CI: 0.86-0.96). Conclusion: Permanent LBBAP might reduce the risk of HF hospitalization or upgrade to biventricular pacing compared with RVP in AVB patients requiring a high burden of ventricular pacing. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03851315; URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn; Unique Identifier: ChiCTR2100043296.
| S-EPMC8297826 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveWe aim to conduct a comparison of the safety and effectiveness performance between left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) and right ventricular pacing (RVP) regimens for patients with atrioventricular block (AVB).MethodsThis observational cohort study included patients who underwent pacemaker implantations with LBBAP or RVP for AVB indications from the 1st of January 2018 to the 18th of November 2021 at West China Hospital. The primary composite outcome included all-cause mortality, lead failure, or heart failure hospitalization (HFH). The secondary outcome included periprocedure complication, cardiac death, or recurrent unexplained syncope. A 1 : 1 propensity score-matched cohort was conducted for left ventricular (LV) function analysis.ResultsA total of 903 patients met the inclusion criteria and completed clinical follow-up. After adjusting for the possible confounders, LBBAP was independently associated with a lower risk of the primary outcome (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.83, p = 0.009), including a lower risk of all-cause mortality and HFH. No significant difference in the secondary outcome was detected between the groups except that LBBAP was independently associated with a lower risk of recurrent unexplained syncope. In the propensity-score matching cohort of echocardiographic analysis, the LV systolic dyssynchrony index was lower in LBBAP compared with that in RVP (5.68 ± 1.92 vs. 6.50 ± 2.28%, p = 0.012).ConclusionsCompared to conventional RVP, LBBAP is a feasible novel pacing model associated with a significant reduction in the primary composite outcome. Moreover, LBBAP significantly reduces the risk of recurrent unexplained syncope and improves LV systolic synchrony. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05722379.
| S-EPMC10462439 | biostudies-literature
Project description:A 70-year-old male with prior orthotopic heart transplant developed left bundle branch block followed by new-onset left ventricular systolic dysfunction. He underwent His bundle pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy with complete normalization of his ejection fraction. This is the first reported case of left bundle branch block-induced cardiomyopathy in a transplanted heart. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).
| S-EPMC8299132 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has proven to be an alternative method for delivering physiological pacing to achieve electrical synchrony of the left ventricle (LV), especially in patients with atrioventricular block and left bundle branch block (LBBB). However, it is unclear whether it still achieved in patients whose left bundle branch (LBB) has had surgery-induced damage. The Morrow operation (Morrow septal myectomy) is regarded as one of the most effective treatments for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM). The surgery resects small sections of muscle tissue in the proximal ventricular septum nearby or contains the LBB, which means that physical damage to the LBB is almost inevitable. Approximately 2%-12% of patients may need pacemaker implanted after Morrow surgery. LBBP is a feasible and effective method for achieving electric resynchronization of LBBB compared to right ventricular pacing (RVB). Nevertheless, there is a dearth of data on LBBP in third-degree atrioventricular block (AVB) following Morrow surgery. We report a case of successful LBBP in those patients.
| S-EPMC11309990 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundComplete atrioventricular block (AVB) is a life-threatening condition that usually occurs in elderly people with organic heart disease. We herein describe a rare case of complete AVB in a young man with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) complicated by cholecystitis and cholangitis. Both cardio-biliary reflex and alcohol septal ablation (ASA) can cause conduction block, but the latter is often irreversible. However, their simultaneous occurrence in a patient has not been reported.Case presentationA 31-year-old man presented with acute cholecystitis and cholangitis and complete AVB, which had been diagnosed at a local hospital on the third day after onset. On the fourth day, he was transferred to the emergency department of our hospital because of persistent complete AVB, although his abdominal pain had been partially relieved. An echocardiogram showed a remarkably elevated left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient (105.2 mmHg) despite the performance of ASA 9 years previously. The abdominal pain gradually disappeared, and normal sinus rhythm was completely recovered 11 days after onset. We determined that cardio-biliary reflex was the cause of the AVB because of the absence of other common causes. Finally, the patient underwent implantation of a permanent pacemaker to reduce the LVOT obstruction and avoid the risk of AVB recurrence.ConclusionsCholecystitis is a rare cause of complete AVB, which is a difficult differential diagnosis when complicated by HOCM after ASA. Clinicians should be alert to the possibility of cholecystitis in patients with abdominal pain and an unknown cause of bradycardia, complete AVB, or even sinus arrest.
| S-EPMC8330103 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) are associated with high morbidity and mortality, which is particularly detrimental when patients develop rapid ventricular rates (RVR). Atrioventricular junction (AVJ) ablation with pacemaker implantation has been used as a method of achieving rate control in patients with incessant AF with RVR. Right ventricular only pacing is known to be harmful in the setting of HF. His bundle pacing (HBP) and biventricular (BiV) pacing both offer durable pacing solutions that offer more physiologic activation. This review describes the benefits and drawbacks of HBP and BiV pacing in HF patients after AVJ ablation.
| S-EPMC6442941 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10885722 | biostudies-literature