Dataset Information

Association between oligo-residual disease and patterns of failure during EGFR-TKI treatment in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study

ABSTRACT:

Background

Local ablative therapy (LAT) may be beneficial for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with oligo-residual disease after treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI). However, this has not been fully established. This study aimed to evaluate the predominant progressive disease (PD) pattern limited to residual sites of disease after treatment with EGFR-TKI.

Methods

Patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC treated with EGFR-TKIs as first-line therapy were retrospectively analysed during a 7-year period. Oligo-residual disease was defined as the presence of 1 – 4 lesions (including the primary site) at 3 months from the start of EGFR-TKI treatment. The predictive factors of PD patterns after EGFR-TKI treatment were evaluated.

Results

A total of 207 patients were included. Three months after the start of EGFR-TKI treatment, 66 patients (32%) had oligo-residual disease. A total of 191 patients had PD, 60 with oligo-residual disease and 131 with non-oligo-residual disease. Regarding the pattern, 44 patients (73%) with oligo-residual disease and 37 patients (28%) with non-oligo-residual disease had PD limited to the residual sites. Multivariate logistic regression analysis at 3 months from the start of EGFR-TKI treatment revealed that oligo-residual disease (P < 0.001), the lack of residual central nervous system metastases (P = 0.032), and initial treatment with osimertinib (P = 0.028) were independent predictors of PD limited to residual disease sites.

Conclusions

This study provided a rationale for LAT to all sites of residual disease in patients with oligo-residual disease during EGFR-TKI treatment.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08983-2.

SUBMITTER: Miyawaki T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8605535 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundResults of several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) testing the combination of an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) plus an anti-angiogenic drug in advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer were reported.MethodsWe first report a systematic review and meta-analysis of all RCTs to estimate effectiveness and toxicity of this new therapeutic approach compared with first-generation EGFR-TKI monotherapy. Subsequently, we present a network meta-analysis comparing the combination of an EGFR-TKI plus an anti-angiogenic drug with 2 new treatment options: combination of an EGFR-TKI plus chemotherapy or new EGFR-TKIs of second or third generation as monotherapy.ResultsFive RCTs were included in the first meta-analysis. The progression-free survival (PFS) was statistically significantly larger in patients treated with an EGFR-TKI plus an anti-angiogenic drug compared with EGFR-TKI monotherapy: the pooled PFS-hazard ratio (HR) was 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.51 to 0.69). The pooled median-PFS was 17.8 months (95% CI = 16.5 to 19.3 months) for the combination vs 11.7 months (95% CI = 11.1 to 12.7 months) for EGFR-TKI as monotherapy. No statistically significant differences between the 2 treatment arms were observed in overall survival or objective response rate. The rate of grade equal or higher than 3 adverse events was statistically significantly higher in patients treated with EGFR-TKI plus an anti-angiogenic drug: the pooled-relative risk was 1.72 (95% CI = 1.43 to 2.06). Ten RCTs were included in the network meta-analysis. All 3 experimental treatments were associated with a statistically significant improvement in PFS compared with first-generation EGFR-TKIs. When compared to each other, none of the 3 experimental treatments were statistically significantly associated with larger PFS or lower rate of grade 3 or higher adverse events.ConclusionPatients with EGFR-mutated non small-cell lung cancer derived clinically meaningful larger PFS benefit from the addition of an anti-angiogenic drug to a first-generation EGFR-TKI at the cost of an increase of toxicities.

Project description:BackgroundMolecular targeted therapy has been developed as an innovative treatment for metastatic cancer. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is one of the most important and frequent oncogenic drivers in non-small-cell lung cancer, and EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors are indispensable drugs for mutation-positive patients. Currently, the acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) is a problem, the mechanism of which has not been elucidated. The histological transformation from original adenocarcinoma to small-cell carcinoma is rare; however, it has been detected in many cases after EGFR-TKI treatment. This study aimed to evaluate mutational status in two different histological types and further elucidate the molecular pathogenesis.MethodsThree patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancer who underwent a histological transformation to small-cell carcinoma after growth factor receptor-TKI treatment were enrolled in this study. Two samples per patient were collected from histologically different lesions, and DNA samples were extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissues. The paired samples were subjected to next-generation sequencing of 160 cancer-related genes. Based on the sequencing results, the expression levels of related proteins were validated using reverse-transferase polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemical staining.ResultsThe following five variants were common among the three cases: MTOR, JAK1, NOTCH2, CSF1R, and MAP2K2. The former four variants were additive to small-cell carcinoma, and the last variant was lost. Both TP53 and Rb1 alterations were detected in adenocarcinoma. Notch2 expression was negative in small-cell carcinoma in both reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction analysis and immunohistochemical staining. ASCL1 expression increased after histological transformation detected using both methods in one case, only these samples were evaluable.ConclusionsNotch and ASCL1 signaling are the master regulators of neuroendocrine differentiation in small-cell lung carcinoma. Our results suggest that the Notch-ASCL1 axis may also play an essential role in the transformation of small-cell carcinoma under TP53 and RB1 inactivation.

Project description:Background and objectivesEpidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are standard-of-care first-line (1L) treatment for EGFR mutation-positive advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. In 2015, osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR-TKI, received US accelerated approval for second-line (2L) EGFR T790M-positive non-small cell lung cancer treatment. The objective of this US study was to characterize treatment patterns, attrition, and survival in EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer, after 1L first-/second-generation EGFR-TKI treatment.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 1029 patients diagnosed with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer from 1 January, 2011 to 31 December, 2018 using the US electronic medical record CancerLinQ Discovery® database. Demographic/disease characteristics, EGFR mutations, treatments, and death dates were collected.ResultsFrom 1 January, 2011 to 31 December, 2014 (< 2015 cohort), 519 patients received 1L EGFR-TKIs and 510 between 1 January, 2015 and 31 December, 2018 (≥ 2015 cohort). Median follow-up from advanced diagnosis was 19.8 months (interquartile range: 9.9-33.4 months). Twenty-eight percent of patients (288/1029) died without receiving 2L, and 52% (539/1029) initiated 2L with 35% (186/539) receiving osimertinib; in the < 2015 and ≥ 2015 cohorts, the same proportion initiated 2L (52%; 272/519 vs 267/510, respectively). Median overall survival from advanced diagnosis for patients initially diagnosed with stage I-IIIA disease was 43.3 months (95% confidence interval 30.9-73.7), vs 26.4 months (95% confidence interval 24.4-28.1) for stage IIIB-IV; all-cause mortality hazard ratio: 1.56 (95% confidence interval 1.2-2.0; p = 0.001).ConclusionsWe identified disease stage, performance status, and central nervous system metastasis as survival predictors, highlighting the importance of optimal 1L treatment selection. Over a quarter of patients died before initiating 2L; half progressed after 1L and received 2L, of whom a third received 2L osimertinib.

Project description:Treatment options for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) failure are limited, and platinum-based chemotherapy remains the main treatment. The development of effective immunotherapy for this disease has been challenging. In the present study, 37 patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC who were treated with programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor-based combinations after TKI failure were reviewed. The total cohort had a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 5.2 months (95% CI, 4.077-6.323 months) and a median overall survival (mOS) of 18.3 months (95% CI, 12.932-23.668 months). Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance-status (ECOG-PS) scores of 0 or 1 had longer mPFS than those with ECOG-PS scores of 2 (5.4 vs. 2.4 months; P=0.006). In addition, a PFS benefit was observed in patients with EGFR T790M-negative compared with EGFR T790M-positive tumors (mPFS 6.2 vs. 4.4 months; P=0.041). Patients treated with immunotherapy-based combinations as a front-line therapy had a longer mPFS than those in which the combinations were used as a late-line therapy (6.2 vs. 2.4 months; P<0.001). PD-1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy and bevacizumab did not show a clear advantage over PD-1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy alone (mPFS, 6.2 vs. 4.4 months; P=0.681), although it resulted in an improved overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate. Notably, the 7 patients with a programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score of ≥50% had an ORR of 100% and an mPFS of 8.3 months. Therefore, it is suggested that PD-1 inhibitor-based combinations should be a priority treatment option in selective populations, such as those with low ECOG-PS scores, T790M-negative status or high PD-L1 expression in EGFR-mutant NSCLC after TKI failure. The use of immunotherapy and chemotherapy in combination with antiangiogenic agents appears to be a promising combination therapy for such patients.

Project description:PurposeThe great efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) has been identified in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who harbor EGFR mutations. However, it has not yet been established in postoperative adjuvant therapy.Patients and methodsTo compare the prognosis and toxicity of EGFR-TKI-based adjuvant therapy and non-EGFR-TKI-based adjuvant therapy in resected NSCLC with sensitive EGFR mutations, we performed this meta-analysis of all eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs).ResultsA comprehensive literature search of electronic databases (from inception to December 31, 2017) was performed. Additionally, abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology conferences and World Conference on Lung Cancer held between January 2000 and November 2017 were searched to identify relevant trials. Disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and grade 3 or 4 toxicities were analyzed. Five RCTs were selected, and 560 participants were included. This meta-analysis demonstrated that EGFR-TKI-based adjuvant therapy was associated with better DFS compared with non-EGFR-TKI-based therapy (HR =0.52, 95% CI 0.34-0.78, P=0.002). Pooled estimate has showed the trend of superiority of EGFR-TKI-based therapy in the aspect of OS (HR =0.65, 95% CI 0.22-1.91, P=0.43); however, the difference was not significant. The incidence rate of grade 3-4 toxicities of EGFR-TKI-based regimens was significantly higher for rash (OR =10.17, 95% CI 2.37-43.63, P=0.002) but lower for vomiting (OR =0.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.61, P=0.02).ConclusionEGFR-TKI-based therapy was associated with better DFS compared with non-EGFR-TKI-based adjuvant therapy in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations. A trend was found that EGFR-TKI-based regimen improved the OS, though the difference was not significant. Although more OS data are needed, EGFR-TKI-based treatment has the potential to be an alternative of adjuvant therapy for NSCLC with a sensitive EGFR mutation.