Adherence to rivaroxaban for the treatment of venous thromboembolism-Results from the FIRST registry.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Medication nonadherence can result in poor clinical outcomes and significant costs to health care providers. When treating venous thromboembolism (VTE), subtherapeutic anticoagulation may contribute to complications such as recurrent VTE or postthrombotic syndrome.Objectives
To describe the extent, reasons for, and predictors of nonadherence to rivaroxaban for the treatment of VTE in clinical practice in the United Kingdom reported by participants of the FIRST registry.Patients/methods
The FIRST registry was an observational, multicenter registry reporting on the use of rivaroxaban in routine clinical practice. FIRST registry participants completed an adherence screening questionnaire during their treatment and follow-up.Results
In total, 1028 participants completed 1660 questionnaires over 2 years. One hundred thirteen of 1028 (11%) reported nonadherence at 28 days (interquartile range, 21-45). Reasons given for nonadherence at 1 month were forgetfulness (8.6% vs 74.7%; P < .001), carelessness (2.7% vs 27.3%; P < .001) or a change in routine (7.4% vs 25.5%; P < .001) reported by adherent and nonadherent participants, respectively. Older age (10-year increments) was the strongest predictor of good adherence (adjusted odds ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.39; 1 = adherent).Conclusions
Overall adherence to rivaroxaban was high, and most nonadherence was unintentional. Identification of those at risk of nonadherence may reduce the risk of VTE recurrence and long-term complications.
SUBMITTER: Speed V
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8606029 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent, potentially life-threatening event that complicates cancer management. Anticoagulants are the cornerstone of therapy for the treatment and prevention of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT); factor Xa-inhibiting direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs; apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban), which have long been recommended for the treatment of VTE in patients without cancer, have been investigated in this setting. The first randomized comparisons of DOACs against low-molecular-weight heparin for the treatment of CAT indicated that DOACs are efficacious in this setting, with findings reflected in recent updates to published guidance on CAT treatment. However, the higher risk of bleeding events (particularly in the gastrointestinal tract) with DOACs highlights the need for appropriate patient selection. Further insights will be gained from additional studies that are ongoing or awaiting publication. The efficacy and safety of DOAC thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory patients with cancer at a high risk of VTE have also been assessed in placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials of apixaban and rivaroxaban. Both studies showed efficacy benefits with DOACs, but both studies also showed a nonsignificant increase in major bleeding events while on treatment. This review summarizes the evidence base for rivaroxaban use in CAT, the patient profile potentially most suited to DOAC use, and ongoing controversies under investigation. We also describe ongoing studies from the CALLISTO (Cancer Associated thrombosis-expLoring soLutions for patients through Treatment and Prevention with RivarOxaban) program, which comprises several randomized clinical trials and real-world evidence studies, including investigator-initiated research.
| S-EPMC7292665 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundRivaroxaban was the first new oral anticoagulant approved for treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Clinical trials have shown that rivaroxaban is noninferior to conventional anticoagulation for VTE in efficacy and safety. Increased fatigue after the initiation of rivaroxaban has been observed in clinical practice, but data on this potential side effect are lacking.ObjectiveThe study aimed to evaluate development of fatigue in patients treated for VTE, comparing rivaroxaban to other anticoagulants.MethodsPatients were prospectively recruited after a diagnosis of VTE. The Fatigue Questionnaire was used to determine the level of fatigue at baseline, at 3 weeks of treatment, and either at 1 month after the discontinuation of treatment if the treatment was discontinued after 3 months or at 6 months if treatment was continued beyond this time. Data was analyzed by a linear mixed model.ResultsA total of 126 patients were included. Mean age was 59 years; 77 (61%) were males. Fifty-seven patients (45%) were diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis, 48 (38%) with pulmonary embolism, and 21 (17%) with both. Predicted changes in fatigue scores from baseline to the last measurement were -0.007 and -2.49 for the rivaroxaban and the other-anticoagulants groups, respectively, neither of which were statistically significant. No difference was detected between rivaroxaban and the other-anticoagulants group at any time point, including subgroup analysis comparing over and under 6 months of treatment duration.ConclusionIn this small study, our results suggest no increase in the level of fatigue after the initiation of treatment with rivaroxaban for VTE.
| S-EPMC7292653 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundRivaroxaban was reported as effective as traditional therapies for the acute treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) with fewer major bleeding complications in the seminal Einstein program and is now a recommended option for the treatment of VTE around the world.ObjectiveTo report the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban in daily care for the management of acute VTE in the United Kingdom.Patients/methodThe FIRST registry is a UK-only, multicenter, noninterventional, observational VTE study (NCT02248610). Consecutive patients diagnosed with acute VTE, managed with rivaroxaban, were recruited and followed for up to 5 years. The primary outcomes were treatment-emergent symptomatic objectively diagnosed recurrent VTE, major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB), and all-cause mortality.ResultsA total of 1262 participants were recruited between 2014 and 2018. Participants were heterogeneous, with age range 18 to 95 years, weight 35 to 234 kg, and maximum body mass index 64.4 kg/m2. The median duration of treatment exposure was 135 days (interquartile range [IQR], 84-307) and overall follow-up 497 days (IQR, 175-991). There were seven episodes of symptomatic VTE recurrence, 0.6%, (0.74/100 patient-years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-1.28). There were 79 of 1239 (6.4%), 8.66 of 100 patient-years (95% CI, 6.90-10.73) first episodes of major or CRNMB, which were most frequently reported by women aged <50 years as abnormal vaginal bleeding.ConclusionsRivaroxaban is an effective and safe single drug modality for the treatment of VTE in daily practice in the United Kingdom. Data to determine the optimal anticoagulation therapy for women of childbearing age are needed.
| S-EPMC8531140 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundLow-molecular-weight heparin has been the preferred treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT); however, emerging data support the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).ObjectivesThe Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Clinical Pathway has served as the institutional guideline for the use of rivaroxaban to treat CAT since 2014. Key elements are to recommend against use of a DOAC in patients with active gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary tract lesions, and a prespecified dose reduction in the elderly (75+ years old). We present our institutional experience for treatment of CAT.MethodsFrom January 2014 through September 2016, 1072 patients began rivaroxaban treatment for CAT; 91.9% had a solid tumor, 8.1% had hematologic malignancies, and 75% of patients with solid tumors had metastatic disease. All patients with CAT treated with rivaroxaban were included in this analysis, regardless of adherence to the Clinical Pathway.ResultsThe 6-month cumulative incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism and major bleeding were 4.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.7%-5.7%) and 2.2% (95% CI, 1.1%-3.2%), respectively. The incidence of clinically relevant non-major bleeding leading to discontinuation of rivaroxaban for at least 7 days was 5.5% (95% CI, 3.7%-7.1%), and 73.3% of major bleeds occurred in the GI tract. The 6-month cumulative mortality rate was 22.2% (95% CI, 19.4%-24.9%). The elderly had similar rates of recurrent thrombosis and bleeding as those aged under 75 years.ConclusionOur institutional experience suggests that in appropriately selected patients, rivaroxaban may be used for treatment of CAT with promising safety and efficacy.
| S-EPMC6611365 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe European rivaroxaban post-authorization safety study evaluated bleeding risk among patients initiated on rivaroxaban or vitamin K antagonists for the treatment and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism in routine clinical practice.MethodsCohorts were created using electronic healthcare databases from the UK, the Netherlands, Germany and Sweden. Patients with a first prescription of rivaroxaban or vitamin K antagonist during the period from December 2011 (in the UK, January 2012) to December 2017 (in Germany, December 2016) for venous thromboembolism indication, with no record of atrial fibrillation or recent cancer history, were observed until the occurrence of each safety outcome (hospitalization for intracranial, gastrointestinal, urogenital or other bleeding), death or study end (December 2018; in Germany, December 2017). Crude incidence rates of each outcome per 100 person-years were computed.ResultsOverall, 44 737 rivaroxaban and 45 842 vitamin K antagonist patients were enrolled, mean age, 59.9-63.8 years. Incidence rates were similar between rivaroxaban and vitamin K antagonist users with some exceptions, including higher incidence rates for gastrointestinal bleeding in rivaroxaban users than in vitamin K antagonist users. Among rivaroxaban users, mortality and bleeding risk generally increased with age, renal impairment and diabetes.ConclusionsThis study provides further data from routine clinical practice that broadly support safety profile of rivaroxaban for VTE indication and complement findings from previous randomized clinical trials.
| S-EPMC10919665 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) remain unclear. Methods and Results: In this subanalysis of the J'xactly study, a multicenter prospective observational study, we evaluated the safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban in patients with acute VTE according to unprovoked (n=388) or provoked (n=557) VTE status. Median follow-up was 21.2 months. Compared with patients in the provoked group, patients in the unprovoked group were younger, less likely to be female, and had higher body weight. The incidence of symptomatic VTE recurrence was significantly higher in the unprovoked than provoked VTE group (3.54% vs. 1.77% per patient-year; P=0.032). There was no significant difference in the incidence of major bleeding events between rivaroxaban-treated patients with unprovoked and provoked VTE (2.31% vs. 3.75% per patient-year; P=0.289). Although the proportion of patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m2 who were non-users of antiplatelet agents was higher in the unprovoked VTE group, there was no interaction effect (BMI: 4.58% vs. 1.55% per patient-year [P=0.040; P for interaction=0.361]; concomitant antiplatelet agent non-users: 3.65% vs. 1.72% per patient-year [P=0.028; P for interaction=0.627]). Conclusions: This subanalysis suggests the safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban in patients with unprovoked VTE. In such patients, DOAC discontinuation should be considered carefully, particularly in those not using antiplatelet agents and those with a high BMI.
| S-EPMC9535131 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and objectives: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) represents a health and economic burden with consequent healthcare resource utilization. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as the mainstay option for VTE treatment but few data exist on their cost-effectiveness as compared to the standard therapy (vitamin K antagonists (VKAs)). This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban compared to VKAs in VTE treatment by calculating the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER). Materials and methods: We conducted a prospective observational study based on the REMOTEV registry, including patients hospitalized for VTE from 23 October 2013 to 31 July 2015, to evaluate the impact of the anticoagulant treatment (DOACs versus VKAs) on 6-month complications: major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding, VTE recurrence and all-cause death. Rivaroxaban was the only DOAC prescribed in this study. The ICER was calculated as the difference in costs divided by the difference in effectiveness. Results: Among the 373 patients included, 279 were treated with rivaroxaban (63.1 ± 17.9 years old; 49% men) and 94 with VKAs (71.3 ± 16.6 years old; 46% men). The mean cost was EUR 5662 [95% CI 6606; 9060] for rivaroxaban and EUR 7721 [95% CI 5130; 6304] for VKAs, while effectiveness was 0.0586 95% CI [0.0114; 0.126] for DOACs and 0.0638 [95% CI 0.0208; 0.109] for VKAs. The rivaroxaban treatment strategy was dominant with costs per patient EUR 2059 lower [95% CI -3582; -817] and a higher effectiveness of 0.00527 [95% CI -0.0606; 0.0761] compared to VKAs. Conclusions: This study provides real-world evidence that rivaroxaban is not only an efficient and safe alternative to VKAs for eligible VTE patients, but also cost-saving.
| S-EPMC9867052 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPolypharmacy, including use of inhibitors of CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein (P-gp), is common in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and is associated with increased bleeding.MethodsIn 8246 patients included in the EINSTEIN-VTE studies for acute VTE, we evaluated the effect of polypharmacy on bleeding and on the relative differences between rivaroxaban and enoxaparin/vitamin K antagonist (VKA). We assessed the incidence of clinically relevant bleeding (major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding) by number of comedications (none, 1-3, ≥4) at baseline, and by use of CYP3A4 and/or P-gp inhibitors. Interaction between rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin/VKA and comedication was assessed by Cox regression analysis with pinteraction estimates.ResultsWith increasing number of comedications, the incidence of clinically relevant bleeding rose from 5.7% to 13.3% in rivaroxaban recipients and from 9.1% to 11.1% in enoxaparin/VKA recipients. Whereas rivaroxaban was associated with a reduced bleeding risk compared with enoxaparin/VKA in patients without comedication (hazard ratio [HR] 0.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4-0.9), the risk was similar in patients with ≥4 comedications (HR 1.2, 95% CI 0.97-1.5, pinteraction .002). Use of CYP3A4 and/or P-gp inhibitors was associated with a doubled bleeding risk compared with no use, without a difference between rivaroxaban and enoxaparin/VKA.ConclusionWe conclude that fixed-dose rivaroxaban as compared with enoxaparin followed by dose-adjusted VKA is not associated with an increased bleeding risk in patients with VTE administered polypharmacy in general and CYP3A4 and/or P-gp inhibitors specifically. This implies that the observed increased bleeding risks with polypharmacy and use of CYP3A4 and/or P-gp inhibitors are likely explained by comorbidities and frailty, and not by pharmacokinetic interactions.
| S-EPMC9313834 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundRandomized trial data demonstrate the gain of extended duration anticoagulation in patients with venous thromboembolic events (VTE); however, real-world data are limited.ObjectivesAssess the risk of recurrent VTE and major bleeding in a real-world setting of patients who experienced unprovoked VTE and received extended treatment with rivaroxaban.MethodsUS claims databases (February 2011-April 2015) were used in this retrospective study. The study population included adult patients initiated on rivaroxaban within 7 days after their first unprovoked VTE (ie, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism) and received ≥3 months continuous rivaroxaban treatment (index date: end of 3-month treatment). Patients who were treated beyond 3 months formed the continued cohort and the remainder formed the discontinued cohort (ie, discontinued at 3 months). Adjusted Kaplan-Meier rates for recurrent VTE and major bleeding events were compared between cohorts with confounders being controlled through a propensity score weighting approach.ResultsPatients in the continued cohort (N = 3763) had significantly lower rates of recurrent VTE than those who discontinued (N = 1051): 0.57% vs 1.19% (P = .042), 1.07% vs 2.10% (P = .017), and 1.45% vs 2.60% (P = .023) at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. No significant differences in the rate of major bleeding were observed between cohorts. A sensitivity analysis among unprovoked VTE patients receiving rivaroxaban for ≥6 months showed similar results.ConclusionsContinued rivaroxaban treatment beyond an initial 3- or 6-month treatment period significantly lowered the risk of recurrent VTE without a significant increase of major bleeding, compared to treatment discontinued at 3 or 6 months.
| S-EPMC6055557 | biostudies-literature
Project description:This retrospective study, utilizing U.S. electronic health record (EHR) data from January 2013 to December 2020, sought to assess whether rivaroxaban and apixaban had similar effectiveness and safety in the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with a cancer type not associated with a high risk of bleeding. We included adults diagnosed with active cancer, excluding esophageal, gastric, unresected colorectal, bladder, noncerebral central nervous system cancers and leukemia, who experienced VTE and received a therapeutic VTE dose of rivaroxaban or apixaban on day 7 post-VTE, and were active in the EHR ≥12 months prior to the VTE. Primary outcome was the composite of recurrent VTE or any bleed resulting in hospitalization at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included recurrent VTE, any bleed resulting in hospitalization, any critical organ bleed, and composites of these outcomes at 3 and 6 months. Inverse probability of treatment-weighted Cox regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We included 1,344 apixaban and 1,093 rivaroxaban patients. At 3 months, rivaroxaban was found to have similar hazard to apixaban for developing recurrent VTE or any bleed resulting in hospitalization (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.60-1.27). No differences were observed between cohorts for this outcome at 6 months (HR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.71-1.40) or for any other outcome at 3 or 6 months. In conclusion, patients receiving rivaroxaban or apixaban showed similar risks of the composite of recurrent VTE or any bleed resulting in hospitalization in patients with cancer-associated VTE. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT05461807. Key Points Rivaroxaban and apixaban have similar effectiveness and safety for treatment of cancer-associated VTE through 6 months.Clinicians should therefore consider patient preference and adherence when choosing the optimal anticoagulant.
| S-EPMC10332896 | biostudies-literature