Dataset Information

Assessment of pain control among patients with cancer in hospitals of the Gaza Strip: a cross-sectional study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Poor control of cancer pain is a major public health problem worldwide. Many potential barriers can lead to suboptimal treatment of cancer pain. One such barrier is inadequate measurement and assessment of cancer-related pain control. This study aimed to assess current pain control and management for hospitalized adult patients with cancer in the Gaza Strip.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted from Dec 10, 2017, to April 25, 2018, in the Gaza Strip. The validated Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) questionnaire was translated into Arabic for data collection. The first section of the questionnaire described the patients' sociodemographic characteristics, the second evaluated the severity of cancer, and the third assessed the interference of pain with daily activities. A ten-point Likert scale was used to evaluate the magnitude of cancer pain and its impact on the patients' lifestyle. Participants were 12 years of age and older, and were patients with cancer who had been admitted to Al-Rantisi Hospital or European Gaza Hospital (the two cancer institutes available in the Gaza Strip), and who had no mental illness or disorder affecting pain perception. Convenience sampling was used to recruit eligible patients for face-to-face interviews to complete the questionnaire. The primary outcome was the median score of cancer pain control. Ethical approval was obtained from the Palestinian Ministry of Health and informed verbal consent was obtained from patients. Data were analysed with SPSS version 22.

Findings

97 patients were assessed, of whom 75% (73 of 97) were eligible and were recruited. The sample size was decided based on the available cases in the included centres during study period. The median age was 49 years (IQR 37-60), 56% (41 of 73) were females, and 86% (63 of 73) were married. Most (81%; 59 of 73) had an educational level of high school or below, and 52% (38 of 73) were unemployed. 90% of patients (66 of 73) had cancer pain as a presenting symptom at diagnosis. 93% (68 of 73) had received painkillers (analgesics) within the past week, 74% (54 of 73) were using analgesics daily, and 43% (31 of 73) reported that they needed potent analgesics. 15% (11 of 73) reported concerns about analgesic addiction. The level of functional impairment owing to pain, as reported using the ten-point Likert scale, was highest for daily activities and routines (median 9·0, IQR 7·0-10·0) and least for social relationships (5·0, 0·0-9·0). There was no statistically significantly association between cancer-related pain and gender, educational level, or occupation.

Interpretation

Most patients were taking analgesics but a large proportion reported the need for more potent or frequent doses of painkillers. In addition, pain had a significant effect on the patients' lifestyle. These findings indicate poor control of cancer pain. There is an urgent need to address the reasons for this, to alleviate pain and to improve quality of life.

Funding

None.

SUBMITTER: Alswerki MN

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8617314 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundSeveral factors might contribute to the delay to get cancer care including poor cancer awareness and having barriers to seeking help. This study described these barriers in Gaza and their association with recalling and recognizing cancer symptoms and risk factors.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in Gaza. Adult visitors (≥18 years) to the largest three governmental hospitals and adolescent students (15-17 years) from ten high schools were recruited. A translated-into-Arabic version of the validated Cancer Awareness Measure (CAM) was used to collect data in face-to-face interviews. It described demographic data, barriers to seek cancer care as well as recall and recognition of cancer symptoms and risk factors. Responses were compared between adults and adolescents as well as males and females.ResultsOf 3033 participants approached, 2886 completed the CAM (response rate= 95.2%). Among them, 1429 (49.5%) were adult (702 females; 49.1%) and 1457 (50.5%) were adolescent (781 females; 53.6%). The mean age± standard deviation (SD) of adult and adolescent participants was 33.7±11.7 years and 16.3±0.8 years, respectively. Emotional barriers were the most common barriers with 'feeling scared' as the most reported barrier (n=1512, 52.4%). Females and adolescents were more likely to report 'feeling scared' as a barrier than males and adults, respectively. Higher recall scores for cancer symptoms were associated with lower likelihood to report 'embarrassment', 'worry about wasting doctor's time' and 'difficulty arranging transport'. This was also seen for recalling risk factors, where 'embarrassment' and all practical barriers showed significant inverse associations with higher scores. In addition, greater recognition scores of cancer risk factors were inversely associated with reporting 'embarrassment' and 'feeling scared'.ConclusionsThe most commonly perceived barriers to seeking cancer care were 'feeling scared' and 'feeling worried about what the doctor might find', followed by practical and service barriers. Females and adolescents were more likely to report 'fear' as a barrier to seek medical advice. Having a higher recall of cancer symptoms and risk factors was inversely associated with reporting most barriers. To improve patient outcome, early presentation can be facilitated by targeting barriers specific to population groups.

Project description:BackgroundIn low-income settings, cancer is often diagnosed in advanced stages due to late presentation. Good public awareness of cancer signs and symptoms has a positive impact on the time patients take before they present to healthcare professionals. Therefore, this study examined public knowledge of cancer signs and symptoms as well as risk factors in Gaza.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional study. Participants were recruited from adult visitors (?18?years) to governmental hospitals covering all five governorates of Gaza, and adolescent students (15 to 17?years) from 10 high schools in corresponding locations. An Arabic version of the Cancer Awareness Measure (CAM) was completed in a face-to-face interview. It described demographic data and knowledge of: cancer prevalence, age-related risk, signs and symptoms as well as risk factors both in recall and recognition questions.ResultsOf 3033 participants invited, 2886 completed the CAM (response rate?=?95.2%). Adult mean age?±?standard deviation was 33.7?±?11.7?years and that of adolescents was 16.3?±?0.8?years. Half of the participants (n?=?1457, 50.5%) were adolescent (781 females; 53.6%) and 1429 (49.5%) were adult (702 females; 49.1%). About two thirds (n?=?1885) thought about cancer as unrelated to age. Only 196 participants (6.8%) identified colorectal cancer as the most common cancer among men. Awareness of cancer signs/symptoms was poor to fair, where ‘lump’ was most commonly recognized (n?=?2227, 77.2%) and ‘change of bowel habit’ the least (n?=?670, 23.2%). Only 217 participants (7.5%) had a good level of recognizing risk factors with ‘smoking’ being the most identified and ‘eating less than five portions of fruits and vegetables a day’ the least. There was a higher likelihood for adults to identify most cancer signs/symptoms and risk factors than adolescents, except for recalling ‘unexplained pain’, ‘persistent cough/hoarseness’, ‘non-healing ulcer’, ‘smoking’, and ‘eating less than five portions of fruits and vegetables a day’.ConclusionPublic awareness of cancer signs/symptoms and risk factors needs to improve to facilitate early presentation and diagnosis in Gaza. Combining the delivery of public campaigns with tailored education to population groups, including the youth, may increase their knowledge and maintain its impact.

Project description:BACKGROUND:The prevalence of overweight and obesity among women of childbearing age is considered a public health concern. Few studies have been conducted in the Gaza Strip to determine the magnitude of overweight and obesity. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of overweight and obesity along with their associated factors among women in the Gaza Strip. METHODS:A cross-sectional study was conducted to recruit a total of 357 mothers aged 18-50?years. Interviews were carried out among mothers to collect sociodemographic information, nutritional information, and physical activity. Anthropometric measurements [height, weight and waist circumference (WC)] were conducted with the mothers. Body Mass Index (BMI) was computed to determine the prevalence of overweight and obesity. Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine the associated factors of overweight and obesity. RESULTS:The combined prevalence of overweight and obesity among mothers was (64.1%). The results of multinomial logistic regression showed the risk of overweight and obesity increased with age, the highest risk being in mothers aged >?33.0?years (OR?=?2.7, 95% CI: (1.06,6.86)), and (OR?=?5.72, 95% CI: (2.07,15.78)), respectively, compared to mothers aged <?33.0?years. Moreover, mothers with medium and high educational levels had a slightly higher risk of obesity (OR?=?0.31, 95% CI: (0.15,0.64)), and (OR?=?0.32, 95% CI: (0.12,0.82)) respectively than mothers with low educational level. Household income was positively associated with overweight and obesity. Mothers exposed to higher monthly income were more likely to be overweight or obese (OR?=?2.64, 95% CI: (1.20, 5.83)), and (OR?=?3.06, 95% CI: (1.28,7.29)), respectively. Nutrition knowledge was significantly associated with a high prevalence of obesity (OR?=?1.20, 95% CI: (1.03,1.38)). CONCLUSIONS:This study showed a higher prevalence of overweight and obesity among Palestinian women than previous studies. Age, educational level, monthly income, and nutrition knowledge were associated with the prevalence of overweight and obesity, compared to other variables that were not associated with overweight and obesity such as location, work status, physical activity, and sitting hours. Urgent action is needed to tackle overweight and obesity among women. Effective intervention is required to increase nutrition knowledge among women to improve their eating behaviors.

Project description:ObjectivesThis study examined the attitudes of nurses and doctors to key patient safety concepts, evaluated differences and similarities between professional groups and assessed positive and negative attitudes to identify target areas for future training.SettingFour major governmental hospitals in the Gaza-Strip.ParticipantsA convenience sample of 424 nurses and 150 physicians working for at least 6 months in the study hospitals.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe primary outcome measures were mean scores with SD as measured for individual items and nine main patient safety domains assessed by the Attitudes to Patient Safety Questionnaire. Secondary outcome measures were the proportions of doctors and nurses, that gave a positive response to each item, represented as percentage of each group.ResultsNurses and doctors held moderately positive attitudes towards patient safety with five out of nine domain scores >3.5 of 5. Doctors showed slightly more positive attitudes than nurses, despite a smaller proportion of doctors having received patient safety training with 37.5% compared with 41.9% of nurses. Both professions displayed their most positive patient safety attitudes in the same domains ('team functioning' and 'working hours as a cause for error'), as well as their two most negative attitudes ('importance of patient safety in the curriculum' and 'professional incompetence as a cause of error'), demonstrating significant deficits in understanding medical errors. A specific challenge will be the negative attitudes of both professions towards patient safety training for wider dissemination of this content in the postgraduate curriculum.ConclusionPatient safety attitudes were moderately positive in both professional groups. Target of future patient safety training should be enhancing the understanding of error in medicine. Any training has to be motivating and relevant for clinicians, demonstrating its importance in ongoing professional learning.

Project description:BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has a great impact on the eating habits, dietary intake, and purchasing behaviours of students. At this critical moment, there is an urgent need to identify the eating habits of school students, in particular, who live in low-income countries, during the lockdown period. Therefore, the present study aims to identify the influence of COVID-19 on the eating habits, quality and quantity of food intake among school students in the Gaza Strip, Palestine.MethodsA cross-sectional study was carried out among 2398 primary and secondary school students aged 6-18 year old through an online questionnaire which included questions on socio-demographic, eating habits as well as quality and quantity of food intake. Students over the age of 11 years completed the questionnaire on their own, whereas for students under the age of 12 years, the students' guardians were instructed to answer the questionnaire on their behalf. A Wilcoxon Signed-Rank and McNemar tests were applied to perform a comparison between general dietary habits before and during COVID-19. Also, a Wilcoxon Signed Rank test was used to compare the median scores of food quality and quantity before and during the COVID-19 pandemic based on student's sociodemographic.ResultsDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a significant increase in eating home-cooked foods (91.6%), avoiding ordering food from outside per week (93.3%) and buying groceries online (7.7%) (p < 0.001). There was a marked increase in the students reporting fear about food hygiene outside the home from 20.8% before COVID-19 to 72.9% during the COVID-19 period (p < 0.001). The results showed that the median score for food quality during the COVID-19 pandemic (11.0/6.0) was significantly higher than the before COVID-19 period (10.0, IQR = 8.0) (p < 0.001). The results revealed that the median score for food quantity before the COVID-19 pandemic (15.0, IQR = 5.0) was significantly higher than the during COVID-19 pandemic (14.0, IQR = 7.0) (p < 0.001). The results showed significant differences between the before and during COVID-19 period for food quality and quantity across socio-demographic variables (gender, age group, parent's highest level of education, monthly household income, and household size). During the COVID-19 pandemic, students from a high-income and a small size family had the highest score in terms of food quality and quantity among other counterparts when compared to other counterparts.ConclusionEating habits have significantly altered among school students during the COVID-19 pandemic. In spite of some good healthy habits enhanced among students, the quantity and the quality of the food was compromised. Therefore, the responsible officials at the Ministry of Education must focus on enhancing school students' awareness towards increased intake of healthy food and adopting good eating habits during the spread of pandemics and health diseases to avoid its negative effects on students.