Dataset Information

Cardiovascular health and risk of hospitalization with COVID-19: A Mendelian Randomization study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Susceptibility to and severity of COVID-19 is associated with risk factors for and presence of cardiovascular disease.

Methods

We performed a 2-sample Mendelian randomization to determine whether blood pressure (BP), body mass index (BMI), presence of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and coronary artery disease (CAD) are causally related to presentation with severe COVID-19. Variant-exposure instrumental variable associations were determined from most recently published genome-wide association and meta-analysis studies (GWAS) with publicly available summary-level GWAS data. Variant-outcome associations were obtained from a recent GWAS meta-analysis of laboratory confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 with severity determined according to need for hospitalization/death. We also examined reverse causality using exposure as diagnosis of severe COVID-19 causing cardiovascular disease.

Results

We found no evidence for a causal association of cardiovascular risk factors/disease with severe COVID-19 (compared to population controls), nor evidence of reverse causality. Causal odds ratios (OR, by inverse variance weighted regression) for BP (OR for COVID-19 diagnosis 1.00 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.99-1.01, P = 0.604] per genetically predicted increase in BP) and T2DM (OR for COVID-19 diagnosis to that of genetically predicted T2DM 1.02 [95% CI: 0.9-1.05, P = 0.927], in particular, were close to unity with relatively narrow confidence intervals.

Conclusion

The association between cardiovascular risk factors/disease with that of hospitalization with COVID-19 reported in observational studies could be due to residual confounding by socioeconomic factors and /or those that influence the indication for hospital admission.

SUBMITTER: Cecelja M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8619738 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPre-eclampsia and eclampsia are among the major threats to pregnant women and fetuses, but they can be mitigated by prevention and early screening. Existing observational research presents conflicting evidence regarding the causal effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on pre-eclampsia risk. Through Mendelian randomization (MR), this study aims to investigate the causal effect of three COVID-19 severity phenotypes on the risk of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia to provide more rigorous evidence.MethodsTwo-sample MR was utilized to examine causal effects. Summary-level data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of individuals of European ancestry were acquired from the GWAS catalog and FinnGen databases. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with COVID-19 traits at p < 5 × -8 were obtained and pruned for linkage disequilibrium to generate instrumental variables for COVID-19. Inverse variance weighted estimates were used as the primary MR results, with weighted median and MR-Egger as auxiliary analyses. The robustness of the MR findings was also evaluated through sensitivity analyses. Bonferroni correction was applied to primary results, with a p < 0.0083 considered significant evidence and a p within 0.083-0.05 considered suggestive evidence.ResultsCritical ill COVID-19 [defined as hospitalization for COVID-19 with either a death outcome or respiratory support, OR (95% CI): 1.17 (1.03-1.33), p = 0.020] and hospitalized COVID-19 [defined as hospitalization for COVID-19, OR (95% CI): 1.10 (1.01-1.19), p = 0.026] demonstrated suggestive causal effects on pre-eclampsia, while general severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection did not exhibit a significant causal effect on pre-eclampsia. None of the three COVID-19 severity phenotypes exhibited a significant causal effect on eclampsia.ConclusionsOur investigation demonstrates a suggestive causal effect of genetic susceptibility to critical ill COVID-19 and hospitalized COVID-19 on pre-eclampsia. The COVID-19 severity exhibited a suggestive positive dose-response relationship with the risk of pre-eclampsia. Augmented attention should be paid to pregnant women hospitalized for COVID-19, especially those needing respiratory support.

Project description:BACKGROUND: Vitamin D deficiency is associated with increased cardiovascular disease risk in observational studies. Whether these associations are causal is not clear. Loss-of-function mutations in the filaggrin gene result in up to 10% higher serum vitamin D concentrations, supposedly due to a decreased UV-protection of the keratinocytes. We used a Mendelian randomization approach to estimate the causal effect of vitamin D status on serum lipids, blood pressure, body mass index, waist circumference, and the metabolic syndrome. METHODS: Three population based studies were included, Monica10 (2,656 individuals aged 40-71 years), Inter99 (6,784 individuals aged 30-60 years), and Health2006 (3,471 individuals aged 18-69 years) conducted in 1993-94, 1999-2001, and 2006-2008, respectively. Participants were genotyped for the two most common filaggrin gene mutations in European descendants R501X and 2282del4, in all three studies and further for the R2447X mutation in the Inter99 and Health2006 studies. Filaggrin genotype was used as instrumental variable for vitamin D status. Baseline measurements of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D were performed in all three studies. RESULTS: Instrumental variable analyses showed a 23.8% (95% confidence interval, CI 3.0, 48.6) higher HDL cholesterol level and a 30.5% (95% CI: 0.8, 51.3) lower serum level of triglycerides per doubling of vitamin D. These associations were, however, not statistically significant when applying the Bonferroni adjusted significance level. The remaining lipids showed non-significant changes in a favorable direction. Doubling of vitamin D gave a non-significantly lower odds ratio = 0.26 (95% CI: 0.06, 1.17) of the metabolic syndrome. There were no statistically significant causal effects of vitamin D status on blood pressure, body mass index, or waist circumference. CONCLUSION: Our results support a causal effect of higher vitamin D status on a more favorable lipid profile, although more studies in other populations are needed to confirm our results.