Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy in rare tracheal tumors.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Jiang BY
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8626609 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Nov
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy in rare tracheal tumors.
Jiang Ben-Yuan BY Zhang Jia-Tao JT Yan Li-Xu LX Chu Xiang-Peng XP Nie Qiang Q Cui Jian-Xiu JX Yang Xue-Ning XN Zhong Wen-Zhao WZ Wu Yi-Long YL
Cancer communications (London, England) 20210729 11
Similar Datasets
Project description:The administration of chemotherapy to cancer patients with organ dysfunction raises concerns regarding its safety. The safety profile of patients with organ dysfunction due to rare diseases treated with chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitor is limited. Fibrinogen storage disease (FSD) is a rare disease that causes liver dysfunction through endoplasmic reticulum stress response due to abnormal accumulation of fibrinogen in the endoplasmic reticulum of hepatocytes. Although chemotherapy plus nivolumab is recommended as a standard first-line treatment for patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC), its safety profile for patients with FSD is rarely available. In this study, an 80-year-old male with gastric cancer with positive lavage cytology was scheduled to receive palliative chemotherapy. This case had liver dysfunction of unknown cause, and a liver biopsy was performed. Histopathological findings revealed a diagnosis of type II/III fibrinogen inclusion based on morphology and immunohistochemistry. Liver function was recovered by administering ursodeoxycholic acid. Therefore, the combination chemotherapy of S-1, oxaliplatin, with nivolumab as palliative chemotherapy was initiated. The case responded well to chemotherapy and achieved conversion surgery without worsening of liver function. We report a case of AGC with fibrinogen inclusion complication where chemotherapy was safely administered with a good outcome. The combination therapy of cytotoxic drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors may be safely and effectively administered to such patients.
| S-EPMC10622163 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as neoadjuvant therapy is a promising novel approach in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of PD-L1 in patients with NSCLC receiving neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy (CT).Materials and methodsSeveral databases (PubMed, Embase, and cochrane central register of controlled trials [CENTRAL]) were systematically searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating pathological and survival outcomes with neoadjuvant ICI + CT versus CT alone in NSCLC were analyzed.ResultsOverall, eight RCTs (n = 3,404) were included. The analyses showed neoadjuvant ICI + CT significantly improved complete pathological response (pCR) and event-free survival (EFS) in either tumor PD-L1 < 1%, ≥ 1%, 1-49%, or ≥ 50% population (both p < 0.0001) compared with neoadjuvant CT alone. The overall survival (OS) data are not yet mature among all included RCTs, and only three RCTs presented OS data by PD-L1 status of patients. The pooled OS favored neoadjuvant ICI + CT in the PD-L1 ≥ 1% population (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% CI, 0.31-0.65; p < 0.0001), but not in the PD-L1 < 1% population (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.66-1.19; p = 0.43).ConclusionsCompared with neoadjuvant CT alone, neoadjuvant ICI + CT significantly enhanced pCR and EFS for patients with resectable NSCLC regardless of the expression of PD-L1. It seems that only patients with PD-L1 positive tumors may achieve a better OS, but it's currently inconclusive due to immature data, so future research with long-term follow-up is still needed.
| S-EPMC11527982 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) improve survival in patients with late-stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) but have not been fully evaluated in locally advanced ESCC.MethodWe retrospectively assessed outcomes of consecutive, treatment-naïve locally advanced ESCC (stage III or IVA) adults treated with neoadjuvant ICI plus chemotherapy followed by surgery, who refused or lacked access to radiotherapy, with regards to surgery feasibility, pathological response, and relapse-free survival (RFS).ResultsWe uneventfully treated 34 patients with the combined regimen in 2020. None reported grade III or higher toxic effects. All underwent surgery as planned: 32 received complete (R0) resections and 2 had microscopically positive margins (R1). Tumor downstaging occurred in 33 (97.1%) patients and 11 (32.4%) had pathologically complete response of the primary lesion. Median postoperative length of stay was 12 days (interquartile range: 11 to 17). All patients resumed a semi-liquid diet on discharge. The 90-day postoperative morbidity rate was 20.6% (7/34) with no mortalities. The 1-year RFS was 77.8% [95% CI, 64.2-94.2].ConclusionNeoadjuvant ICI plus chemotherapy was safe and resulted in significant downstaging, rendering inoperable tumors operable, relieving symptoms of dysphagia and prolonging survival for locally advanced ESCC patients who refused or lacked access to radiotherapy.
| S-EPMC9226664 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe utilization of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) plus chemotherapy has increased significantly for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It is still unclear whether such a treatment paradigm affects perioperative outcomes compared with other neoadjuvant treatment. We aimed to evaluate the perioperative outcomes of pulmonary resection after neoadjuvant ICI plus chemotherapy and to compare them with neoadjuvant epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone for resectable NSCLC.MethodsA retrospective cohort including 194 stage IB-IIIB NSCLC underwent surgical resection after neoadjuvant treatment between 2018 and 2020 were reviewed. Perioperative complications were evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, and were compared using one-way analysis of variance for continuous variables and Pearson chi-square test.ResultsThere were 42, 54, and 98 patients in the neoadjuvant ICI plus chemotherapy, EGFR-TKI, and chemotherapy alone groups, respectively. The tumor size before neoadjuvant treatment was well balanced among the three groups (P=0.122). A shorter median surgical time was observed in the EGFR-TKI group than ICI plus chemotherapy group and chemotherapy group alone (120 vs. 150 vs. 146 min, P=0.041). Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery was performed in 37 (88.1%), 49 (90.7%), and 57 (58.7%) patients in the three groups, respectively (P<0.001). A higher incidence of pneumonia (P=0.014) was found in the chemotherapy group. Perioperative mortality was observed in 1 patient (2.4%) in the ICI plus chemotherapy group and in 3 patients (3.1%) in the chemotherapy alone group (P=0.440). Patients in the ICI plus chemotherapy group had higher proportions of pathological complete response (40.5% vs. 11.1% vs. 6.1%, P<0.001) and downstaging of clinical N2 status (68.6% vs. 42.9% vs. 31.7%, P=0.012) than patients in EGFR-TKI group and chemotherapy alone group.ConclusionsSurgical resection for NSCLC following neoadjuvant ICI plus chemotherapy was safe and feasible, the perioperative outcomes were similar with neoadjuvant EGFR-TKI and chemotherapy alone without unexpected perioperative complications. Additional prospective studies are necessary to validate our findings.
| S-EPMC9359956 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeSome studies have shown that Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have a favorable efficacy in advanced triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients, but the results are controversial in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) stage. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety after NACT plus ICIs in early TNBC patients.MethodsAfter searching PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane library and several mainly oncology conferences up to 30 January 2021 systematically, and define randomized controlled trials (RCTs) exploring the efficacy and safety of programmed death protein-1/programmed cell death-Ligand 1(PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in TNBC patients. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) in intention-to-treat populations (ITT), and the secondary endpoints were event-free survival (EFS) and safety analysis in the ITT populations.ResultsSix RCTs (N = 2142) were included in our meta-analysis; NACT plus ICIs increased pCR rates compared with NACT in intention-to-treat (ITT) populations (OR: 1.91; 95% CI: 1.32-2.78, P < 0.001). The pCR rate also increased in both PD-L1 positive (OR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.26-2.16, P < 0.001) and PD-L1 negative patients (OR: 1.56; 95% CI: 1.04-2.33, P = 0.03), especially in PD-L1 positive patients. The benefit was also observed in nodal-positive populations (OR: 2.52; 95% CI: 1.69-3.77, P < 0.001) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance-status score (ECOG PS) 0 subgroup (OR: 1.90; 95% CI: 1.42-2.53, P < 0.001). Three RCTs (N = 1615) reported EFS and the results showed that adding PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors increased EFS (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.50-0.83, P = 0.0007) in ITT populations with a short follow-up time. In the safety analysis of 2205 patients with early TNBC from five eligible studies, NACT plus ICIs had a higher risk of grade 3-4 diarrhea (OR: 2.54; 95% CI: 1.21-5.32; P = 0.01), any grade of adverse effects(AEs)including vomiting (OR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.00-1.86; P = 0.05), hyperthyroidism (OR: 6.04; 95% CI: 2.39-15.29; P < 0.001), and hypothyroidism (OR: 5.04; 95% CI: 3.02-8.39; P < 0.001).ConclusionsPD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy can improve pCR rates and EFS, and with an increased incidence of some immune-related AEs compared with chemotherapy alone. NACT plus ICIs might be an option in patients with in PD-L1 positive and high-risk populations with positive nodal disease early TNBC.
| S-EPMC8609839 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) is a promising strategy for treating cancer. However, the efficiency of ICI monotherapy is limited, which could be mainly attributed to the tumor microenvironment of the "cold" tumor. Prostate cancer, a type of "cold" cancer, is the most common cancer affecting men's health. Radiotherapy is regarded as one of the most effective prostate cancer treatments. In the era of immune therapy, the enhanced antigen presentation and immune cell infiltration caused by radiotherapy might boost the therapeutic efficacy of ICI. Here, the rationale of radiotherapy combined with ICI was reviewed. Also, the scheme of radiotherapy combined with immune checkpoint blockades was suggested as a potential option to improve the outcome of patients with prostate cancer.
| S-EPMC10403272 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) occur in various regions of the body and present with complex clinical and biochemical phenotypes. The molecular underpinnings that give rise to such varied manifestations have not been completely deciphered. The management of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) involves surgery, locoregional therapy, and/or systemic therapy. Several forms of systemic therapy, including platinum-based chemotherapy, temozolomide/capecitabine, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors, and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy have been extensively studied and implemented in the treatment of NETs. However, the potential of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy as an option in the management of NETs has only recently garnered attention. Till date, it is not clear whether ICI therapy holds any distinctive advantage in terms of efficacy or safety when compared to other available systemic therapies for NETs. Identifying the characteristics of NETs that would make them (better) respond to ICIs has been challenging. This review provides a summary of the current evidence on the value of ICI therapy in the management of ICIs and discusses the potential areas for future research.
| S-EPMC9731788 | biostudies-literature
Project description:We evaluated the efficacy and safety of TAS0313, a multi-epitope long peptide vaccine, plus pembrolizumab in post-chemotherapy immune checkpoint inhibitor-naïve patients with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC). TAS0313 9 mg was administered subcutaneously followed by pembrolizumab 200 mg on Day 1, and as monotherapy on Day 8 and 15 of Cycles 1 and 2, and Day 1 of subsequent cycles in 21-day cycles. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Biomarkers of response were assessed. In 36 patients enrolled, the ORR was 33.3% (complete response: 7 patients; partial response: 5 patients). Median PFS was 5.0 months; 6- and 12-month progression-free rates were 46.4% and 36.5%, respectively. Median OS was not reached; 6-, 12-, and 24-month OS rates were 83.3%, 72.2%, and 55.1%, respectively. In post hoc analysis, patients with a tumor infiltrating CD8+ lymphocyte (CD8+ TIL) count ≥99 and/or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) ≥50 and lymphocyte count >1,380 cells/μL had higher ORRs and prolonged PFS versus patients with a CD8+ TIL count <99, PD-L1 CPS <50, and lymphocyte count ≤1,380 cells/μL. Thirty-four (94.4%) patients receiving combination therapy experienced treatment-related adverse events (AE), with pyrexia (n = 15, 41.7%), injection-site reactions (n = 15, 41.7%), injection-site induration (n = 6, 16.7%), and malaise (n = 6, 16.7%) the most common. No grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs occurred in ≥10% of patients. TAS0313 plus pembrolizumab combination therapy showed promising efficacy and manageable safety in la/mUC. Clinical Trial Registration: JapicCTI-183824.
| S-EPMC10985476 | biostudies-literature
Project description:"Rare cancers" are a diverse collection of cancers that collectively account for approximately 20% of all adult cancers in the United States. Their rarity has caused an underrepresentation of these cancers in preclinical research and clinical trials, leading to fewer (and often no) treatment options for patients backed by robust clinical evidence. The recent advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) into the oncologist's armamentarium, while revolutionizing the treatment of many common cancers, has also started to make gradual inroads into the treatment of certain rare cancers. One reason is that the efficacy of ICIs depends more on factors intrinsic to the tumor cells and the tumor microenvironment and less on tumor histology. Recent years have seen ICI approvals in many rare cancers, and many trials are being designed using ICIs as single agents or in combination. In this commentary, we present an overview of the emerging role of ICIs in some rare cancers.
| S-EPMC8189105 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment + chemotherapy has been used for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, evidence regarding the efficacy of this treatment is insufficient, particularly in Chinese patients. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant ICI treatment + chemotherapy compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone for locally advanced NSCLC. For this, 50 patients with locally advanced NSCLC were retrospectively analyzed; of these, 23 patients received pre-operative camrelizumab or sintilimab + chemotherapy (ICI + chemo group) and 27 patients received pre-operative chemotherapy alone (chemo group). The objective response rate (73.9 vs. 44.4%, P=0.035) was superior in the ICI + chemo group compared with the chemo group. Nevertheless, surgical resection rate (100.0 vs. 88.9%, P=0.240), major pathological response (60.9 vs. 41.7%, P=0.188) and complete pathological response (CPR; 30.4 vs. 8.3%, P=0.072) were not significantly different in the ICI + chemo group compared with the chemo group. Following adjustment, ICI + chemo was independently associated with an elevated CPR (P=0.029). Disease-free survival (DFS) was prolonged in the ICI + chemo group compared with the chemo group (1-year DFS, 94.1 vs. 81.6%; 2-year DFS, 80.7 vs. 42.9%; P=0.047), while no significant differences were observed in overall survival (OS; 1-year OS, 100.0 vs. 95.7%; 2-year OS, 90.0 vs. 64.9%; P=0.187). Additionally, the majority of adverse event incidences (apart from leukopenia) did not differ significantly between the ICI + chemo and chemo groups (all P>0.050). On the whole, the present study demonstrated that neoadjuvant ICI treatment + chemotherapy exhibited adequate efficacy and acceptable toxicity compared with chemotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced NSCLC.
| S-EPMC10236247 | biostudies-literature