Dataset Information

Central nervous system infection in the intensive care unit: Development and validation of a multi-parameter diagnostic prediction tool to identify suspected patients.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Central nervous system infections (CNSI) are diseases with high morbidity and mortality, and their diagnosis in the intensive care environment can be challenging. Objective: To develop and validate a diagnostic model to quickly screen intensive care patients with suspected CNSI using readily available clinical data.

Methods

Derivation cohort: 783 patients admitted to an infectious diseases intensive care unit (ICU) in Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro RJ, Brazil, for any reason, between 01/01/2012 and 06/30/2019, with a prevalence of 97 (12.4%) CNSI cases. Validation cohort 1: 163 patients prospectively collected, between 07/01/2019 and 07/01/2020, from the same ICU, with 15 (9.2%) CNSI cases. Validation cohort 2: 7,270 patients with 88 CNSI (1.21%) admitted to a neuro ICU in Chicago, IL, USA between 01/01/2014 and 06/30/2019. Prediction model: Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to construct the model, and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used for model validation. Eight predictors-age <56 years old, cerebrospinal fluid white blood cell count >2 cells/mm3, fever (≥38°C/100.4°F), focal neurologic deficit, Glasgow Coma Scale <14 points, AIDS/HIV, and seizure-were included in the development diagnostic model (P<0.05).

Results

The pool data's model had an Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics (AUC) curve of 0.892 (95% confidence interval 0.864-0.921, P<0.0001).

Conclusions

A promising and straightforward screening tool for central nervous system infections, with few and readily available clinical variables, was developed and had good accuracy, with internal and external validity.

SUBMITTER: Andrade HB

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8629274 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundDroplet digital PCR (ddPCR) has emerged as a promising tool of pathogen detection in bloodstream infections (BSIs) in critical care medicine. However, different ddPCR platforms have variable sensitivity and specificity for diverse microorganisms at various infection sites. There is still a lack of prospective clinical studies aimed at validating and interpreting the discrepant ddPCR results for diagnosing BSI in intensive care unit (ICU) practice.MethodsA prospective diagnostic study of multiplex ddPCR panels was conducted in a general ICU from May 21, 2021, to December 22, 2021. Paired blood cultures (BCs) and ddPCRs (2.5 h) were obtained synchronously to detect the 12 most common BSI pathogens and three antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes. Firstly, ddPCR performance was compared to definite BSI. Secondly, clinical validation of ddPCR was compared to composite clinical diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated. Thirdly, the positive rate of AMR genes and related analysis was presented.ResultsA total of 438 episodes of suspected BSIs occurring in 150 critical patients were enrolled. BC and ddPCR were positive for targeted bacteria in 40 (9.1%) and 180 (41.1%) cases, respectively. There were 280 concordant and 158 discordant. In comparison with BCs, the sensitivity of ddPCR ranged from 58.8 to 86.7% with an aggregate of 72.5% in different species, with corresponding specificity ranging from 73.5 to 92.2% with an aggregate of 63.1%. Furthermore, the rate of ddPCR+/BC- results was 33.6% (147/438) with 87.1% (128 of 147) cases was associated with probable (n = 108) or possible (n = 20) BSIs. When clinically diagnosed BSI was used as true positive, the final sensitivity and specificity of ddPCR increased to 84.9% and 92.5%, respectively. In addition, 40 blaKPC, 3blaNDM, and 38 mecA genes were detected, among which 90.5% were definitely positive for blaKPC. Further, 65.8% specimens were predicted to be mecA-positive in Staphylococcus sp. according to all microbiological analysis.ConclusionsThe multiplexed ddPCR is a flexible and universal platform, which can be used as an add-on complementary to conventional BC. When combined with clinical infection evidence, ddPCR shows potential advantages for rapidly diagnosing suspected BSIs and AMR genes in ICU practice.

Project description:BackgroundNursing care is a critical determinant of patient outcomes in the intensive care unit (ICU). Most studies of nursing care have focused on nursing characteristics aggregated across the ICU (eg, unit-wide nurse-to-patient ratios, education, and working environment). In contrast, relatively little work has focused on the influence of individual nurses and their characteristics on patient outcomes. Such research could provide granular information needed to create evidence-based nurse assignments, where a nurse's unique skills are matched to each patient's needs. To date, research in this area is hindered by an inability to link individual nurses to specific patients retrospectively and at scale.ObjectiveThis study aimed to determine the feasibility of using nurse metadata from the electronic health record (EHR) to retrospectively determine nurse-patient assignments in the ICU.MethodsWe used EHR data from 38 ICUs in 18 hospitals from 2018 to 2020. We abstracted data on the time and frequency of nurse charting of clinical assessments and medication administration; we then used those data to iteratively develop a deterministic algorithm to identify a single ICU nurse for each patient shift. We examined the accuracy and precision of the algorithm by performing manual chart review on a randomly selected subset of patient shifts.ResultsThe analytic data set contained 5,479,034 unique nurse-patient charting times; 748,771 patient shifts; 87,466 hospitalizations; 70,002 patients; and 8,134 individual nurses. The final algorithm identified a single nurse for 97.3% (728,533/748,771) of patient shifts. In the remaining 2.7% (20,238/748,771) of patient shifts, the algorithm either identified multiple nurses (4,755/748,771, 0.6%), no nurse (14,689/748,771, 2%), or the same nurse as the prior shift (794/748,771, 0.1%). In 200 patient shifts selected for chart review, the algorithm had a 93% accuracy (ie, correctly identifying the primary nurse or correctly identifying that there was no primary nurse) and a 94.4% precision (ie, correctly identifying the primary nurse when a primary nurse was identified). Misclassification was most frequently due to patient transitions in care location, such as ICU transfers, discharges, and admissions.ConclusionsMetadata from the EHR can accurately identify individual nurse-patient assignments in the ICU. This information enables novel studies of ICU nurse staffing at the individual nurse-patient level, which may provide further insights into how nurse staffing can be leveraged to improve patient outcomes.