Dataset Information

Prognostic significance of T-cell-inflamed gene expression profile and PD-L1 expression in patients with esophageal cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

The ability of the T-cell-inflamed gene expression profile (GEP) to predict clinical outcome in esophageal cancer (EC) is unknown. This retrospective observational study assessed the prognostic value of GEP and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in patients with EC treated in routine clinical practice.

Methods

Tumor samples of 294 patients from three centers in Denmark, South Korea, and the United States, collected between 2005 and 2017, were included. T-cell-inflamed GEP score was defined as non-low or low using a cutoff of -1.54. A combined positive score (CPS) ≥10 was defined as PD-L1 expression positivity. Associations between overall survival (OS) and GEP status and PD-L1 expression were explored by Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for age, sex, histology, stage, and performance status.

Results

Median age was 65 years; 63% of patients had adenocarcinoma (AC) and 37% had squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Thirty-six percent of tumors were GEP non-low, with higher prevalence in AC (46%) than SCC (18%). Twenty-one percent were PD-L1-positive: 32% in South Korean samples versus 16% in non-Asian samples and 26% in SCC versus 18% in AC. GEP scores and PD-L1 CPS were weakly correlated (Spearman's R = 0.363). OS was not significantly associated with GEP status (non-low vs low; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.69-1.19]) or PD-L1 expression status.

Conclusion

Neither GEP nor PD-L1 expression was a prognostic marker in Asian and non-Asian patients with EC.

SUBMITTER: Steiniche T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8633232 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundWhether PD-L1/PD-1 expression plays a significant role in the prognosis of NPC is still controversial. The present study mainly aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of PD-L1/PD-1 expression in patients with NPC.MethodsA systematical research was performed in the PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases up to January 06, 2019. Eighteen studies met eligible criteria were included in the meta-analysis. Quality assessment of included articles was evaluated by Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale (NOS). Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to elucidated the primary endpoint, overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints. Furthermore, the relationship between clinicopathological features of NPC and PD-L1/PD-1 expression was estimated by relative ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs.ResultsA total of 1836 patients from 15 included studies concerning PD-L1 and 678 patients from six studies regarding PD-1 were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled results revealed that PD-L1 expression in NPC did not correlate with OS (HR 1.34 95% CI 0.93-1.93, p?=?0.11), DFS (HR 1.82, 95% CI 0.86-3.85, p?=?0.12), PFS (HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.46-3.08, p?=?0.72), and DMFS (HR 2.26, 95% CI 0.60-8.56, p?=?0.23). Meanwhile, no statistically significant differences existed between the expression level of PD-1 in tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and the OS in NPC, with the pooled HR 1.29 (95% CI 0.68-2.42, p?=?0.44). In subgroup analysis, higher expression of PD-L1 in immune cells correlated with better OS in patients with NPC, with a pooled HR 0.68 (95% CI 0.47-0.99, p?=?0.04). Among the clinicopathological features included in our study, we found that the positive expression of PD-L1 in NPC associated with the higher expression of PD-1 (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.02-1.52, p?=?0.03).ConclusionsOur meta-analysis indicated that higher/positive expression of PD-L1/PD-1 may not serve as suitable biomarkers for the prognosis of NPC, which was not in consistent with some previous studies about the prognostic value of PD-L1/PD-1 in other types of tumors. Despite the positive results in subgroup analysis and study about clinicopathological features, it may still need corroboration of prospective and large-scale studies.