Dataset Information

Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for cervical spine (facet) joint pain from a multispecialty international working group.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The past two decades have witnessed a surge in the use of cervical spine joint procedures including joint injections, nerve blocks and radiofrequency ablation to treat chronic neck pain, yet many aspects of the procedures remain controversial.

Methods

In August 2020, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine and the American Academy of Pain Medicine approved and charged the Cervical Joint Working Group to develop neck pain guidelines. Eighteen stakeholder societies were identified, and formal request-for-participation and member nomination letters were sent to those organizations. Participating entities selected panel members and an ad hoc steering committee selected preliminary questions, which were then revised by the full committee. Each question was assigned to a module composed of 4-5 members, who worked with the Subcommittee Lead and the Committee Chairs on preliminary versions, which were sent to the full committee after revisions. We used a modified Delphi method whereby the questions were sent to the committee en bloc and comments were returned in a non-blinded fashion to the Chairs, who incorporated the comments and sent out revised versions until consensus was reached. Before commencing, it was agreed that a recommendation would be noted with >50% agreement among committee members, but a consensus recommendation would require ≥75% agreement.

Results

Twenty questions were selected, with 100% consensus achieved in committee on 17 topics. Among participating organizations, 14 of 15 that voted approved or supported the guidelines en bloc, with 14 questions being approved with no dissensions or abstentions. Specific questions addressed included the value of clinical presentation and imaging in selecting patients for procedures, whether conservative treatment should be used before injections, whether imaging is necessary for blocks, diagnostic and prognostic value of medial branch blocks and intra-articular joint injections, the effects of sedation and injectate volume on validity, whether facet blocks have therapeutic value, what the ideal cut-off value is for designating a block as positive, how many blocks should be performed before radiofrequency ablation, the orientation of electrodes, whether larger lesions translate into higher success rates, whether stimulation should be used before radiofrequency ablation, how best to mitigate complication risks, if different standards should be applied to clinical practice and trials, and the indications for repeating radiofrequency ablation.

Conclusions

Cervical medial branch radiofrequency ablation may provide benefit to well-selected individuals, with medial branch blocks being more predictive than intra-articular injections. More stringent selection criteria are likely to improve denervation outcomes, but at the expense of false-negatives (ie, lower overall success rate). Clinical trials should be tailored based on objectives, and selection criteria for some may be more stringent than what is ideal in clinical practice.

SUBMITTER: Hurley RW

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8633772 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundFacet tropism is defined as the asymmetry between the left and right facet joints relative to the sagittal plane. Published clinical studies have found that facet tropism is associated with cervical disc herniation. However, the relationship between the facet orientation and the side of cervical disc herniation remains controversial. Therefore, this study used the finite-element technique to investigate the biomechanical effects of the sagittal angle of the cervical facet joints on the cervical intervertebral disc.ObjectiveThe biomechanical effects of the sagittal angle of the cervical facet joint on the cervical disc and facet joint were investigated using the finite-element technique.MethodsThe finite-element model was constructed using computed tomography scans of a 26-year-old female volunteer. First, a cervical model was constructed from C3 to C7. The model was verified using data from previously published studies. Second, the facet orientation at the C5-C6 level was altered to simulate different sagittal angles of cervical facet joints. Five models, F70, F80, F90, F100, and F110, were simulated with different facet joint orientations (70°, 80°, 90°, 100°, and 110° facet joint angles at the left side, respectively, and 90° facet joint angles at the right side) at the C5-C6 facet joints. In each model, annular fibres stress and facet cartilage pressure were studied under six pure moments and two combined moments.ResultsComparing the stress of the annulus fibres in flexion combined with right axial rotation and in flexion combined with left axial rotation in the same model, no difference in the maximum stress of the annulus fibres was noted between these two different moments in the F90 model, whereas differences of 12.80%, 8.84%, 14.95% and 33.32% were noted in the F70, F80, F100 and F110 models, respectively. The same trend was observed when comparing the maximum stress of the annulus fibres in each model during left and right axial rotation. No differences in annular fibres stress and facet cartilage pressure were noted among the five models in flexion, extension, lateral bending, left axial rotation, and flexion combined with left axial rotation in this study. However, compared with the F70 model in flexion combined with right axial rotation, the annulus fibres stress of the F80, F90, F100, and F110 models increased by 5.53%, 13.03%, 35.04%, and 72.94%, respectively, and the pressure of the left facet joint of these models decreased by 5.65%, 12.10%, 18.41%, and 25.74%, respectively. The same trend was observed in the right axial moment.ConclusionFacet tropism leads to unbalanced stress distribution on the annulus fibres at the cervical intervertebral disc. The greater the sagittal angle of the facet joint, the greater the annular fibres stress on this side. We hypothesised that the side with the larger sagittal angle of the facet joint exhibits a greater risk of disc herniation.