Project description:OBJECTIVES:To examine changes in care practices over time by race and ethnicity and whether the decrease in hospital mortality and severe morbidities has benefited infants of minority over infants of white mothers. METHODS:Infants 22 to 29 weeks' gestation born between January 2006 and December 2017 at a Vermont Oxford Network center in the United States were studied. We examined mortality and morbidity rate differences and 95% confidence intervals for African American and Hispanic versus white infants by birth year. We tested temporal differences in mortality and morbidity rates between white and African American or Hispanic infants using a likelihood ratio test on nested binomial regression models. RESULTS:Disparities for certain care practices such as antenatal corticosteroids and for some in-hospital outcomes have narrowed over time for minority infants. Compared with white infants, African American infants had a faster decline for mortality, hypothermia, necrotizing enterocolitis, and late-onset sepsis, whereas Hispanic infants had a faster decline for mortality, respiratory distress syndrome, and pneumothorax. Other morbidities showed a constant rate difference between African American and Hispanic versus white infants over time. Despite the improvements, outcomes including hypothermia, mortality, necrotizing enterocolitis, late-onset sepsis, and severe intraventricular hemorrhage remained elevated by the end of the study period, especially among African American infants. CONCLUSIONS:Racial and ethnic disparities in vital care practices and certain outcomes have decreased. That the quality deficit among minority infants occurred for several care practice measures and potentially modifiable outcomes suggests a critical role for quality improvement initiatives tailored for minority-serving hospitals.
Project description:ObjectivesTo determine the outcomes and resource usage of infants born at ≤ 25 weeks gestational age (GA).MethodsRetrospective study of infants born between April 2009 and September 2011 at ≤ 25 weeks' GA in all neonatal intensive care units in Canada with follow-up in the neonatal follow-up clinics. Short-term morbidities, neurodevelopmental impairment, significant neurodevelopmental impairment, and resource utilization of infants born at ≤ 24 weeks were compared with neonates born at 25 weeks.ResultsOf 803 neonates discharged alive, 636 (80.4%) infants born at ≤ 25 weeks' GA were assessed at 18 to 24 months. Caesarean delivery, lower birth weight, and less antenatal steroid exposure were more common in infants born ≤ 24 weeks as compared with 25 weeks. They had significantly higher incidences of ductus arteriosus ligation, severe intracranial hemorrhage, retinopathy of prematurity as well as longer length of stay, central line days, days on respiratory support, days on total parenteral nutrition, days on antibiotics, and need for postnatal steroids. Neurodevelopmental impairment rates were 68.9, 64.5, and 55.6% (P=0.01) and significant neurodevelopmental impairment rates were 39.3, 29.6, and 20.9% (P<0.01) for infants ≤ 23, 24, and 25 weeks GA, respectively. Postdischarge service referrals were higher for those ≤ 23 weeks. Nonsurviving infants born at 25 weeks GA had higher resource utilization during admission than infants born less than 25 weeks.ConclusionsAdverse outcomes and resource usage were significantly higher among infants born ≤ 24 weeks GA as compared with 25 weeks GA.
Project description:ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the association between acute kidney injury (AKI) and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in infants born <32 weeks of gestational age (GA).Study designPresent study is a secondary analysis of premature infants born at <32 weeks of GA in the Assessment of Worldwide Acute Kidney Injury Epidemiology in Neonates (AWAKEN) retrospective cohort (n = 546). We stratified by gestational age and used logistic regression to determine association between AKI and moderate or severe BPD/mortality.ResultsModerate or severe BPD occurred in 214 of 546 (39%) infants, while death occurred in 32 of 546 (6%); the composite of moderate or severe BPD/death occurred in 246 of 546 (45%). For infants born ≤29 weeks of gestation, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) of AKI and the primary outcome was 1.15 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.47-2.86; p = 0.76). Infants born between 29 and 32 weeks of gestation with AKI had four-fold higher odds of moderate or severe BPD/death that remained after controlling for multiple factors (adjusted OR = 4.21, 95% CI: 2.07-8.61; p < 0.001).ConclusionNeonates born between 29 and 32 weeks who develop AKI had a higher likelihood of moderate or severe BPD/death than those without AKI. Further studies are needed to validate our findings and evaluate mechanisms of multiorgan injury.
Project description:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the most commonly used medications and in-hospital morbidities and mortality in infants born 22-24 weeks of gestation. STUDY DESIGN:Multicenter retrospective cohort study of infants born 22-24 weeks of gestation (2006-2016), without major congenital anomalies and with available medication data obtained from neonatal intensive care units managed by the Pediatrix Medical Group. RESULTS:This study included 7578 infants from 195 sites. Median (25th, 75th percentile): birthweight was 610?g (540, 680); the number of distinct medications used was 13 (8, 18); and different antimicrobial exposure was 4 (2, 5). The most common morbidities were BPD (41%) and grade III or IV IVH (20%), and overall survival varied from 46% (2006) to 57% (2016). CONCLUSIONS:A large number of medications were used in periviable infants. There was a high prevalence of in-hospital morbidities, and survival of this population increased over the study period.
Project description:ObjectiveThis study was aimed to assess the incidence of and risk factors for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) among preterm infants born <29 weeks' gestational age (GA).MethodsA retrospective cohort study of infants born <29 weeks' GA admitted to two tertiary neonatal intensive care units (2009 to 2017) and followed ≥18 months corrected age (CA) at a neonatal follow-up clinic. The primary outcome was ASD, diagnosed using standardized testing or provisional diagnosis at ≥18 months CA. Patient data and 18-month CA developmental outcomes were obtained from the local Canadian Neonatal Follow Up Network database and chart review. Stepwise logistic regression assessed factors associated with ASD.ResultsAmong 300 eligible infants, 26 (8.7%) were diagnosed with confirmed and 21 (7.0%) with provisional ASD for a combined incidence of 15.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.7 to 20.3). The mean follow-up duration was 3.9 ± 1.4 years and the mean age of diagnosis was 3.7 ± 1.5 years. Male sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.63, 95% CI 2.12 to 10.10), small for gestational age status (aOR 3.03, 95% CI 1.02 to 9.01), maternal age ≥35 years at delivery (aOR 2.22, 95% CI 1.08 to 4.57) and smoking during pregnancy (aOR 5.67, 95% CI 1.86 to 17.29) were significantly associated with ASD. Among ASD infants with a complete 18-month CA developmental assessment, 46% (19/41) had no neurodevelopmental impairment (Bayley-III<70, deafness, blindness, or cerebral palsy).ConclusionsASD is common among infants born <29 weeks' GA and possibly associated with identified risk factors. Such findings emphasize the importance of ASD evaluation among infants <29 weeks' GA and for continued reporting of developmental outcomes beyond 18-months of corrected age.
Project description:ObjectiveTo investigate the safety, feasibility and efficacy of delayed cord clamping (DCC) compared with immediate cord clamping (ICC) at delivery among infants born at 22 to 27 weeks' gestation.Study designThis was a pilot, randomized, controlled trial in which women in labor with singleton pregnancies at 22 to 27 weeks' gestation were randomly assigned to ICC (cord clamped at 5 to 10 s) or DCC (30 to 45 s).ResultsForty mother-infant pairs were randomized. Infants in the ICC and DCC groups had mean gestational ages (GA) of 24.6 and 24.4 weeks, respectively. No differences were observed between the groups across all available safety measures, although infants in the DCC group had higher admission temperatures than infants in the ICC group (97.4 vs. 96.2 °F, P=0.04). During the first 24 h of life, blood pressures were lower in the ICC group than in the DCC group (P<0.05), despite a threefold greater incidence of treatment for hypotension (45% vs. 12%, P<0.01). Infants in the ICC group had increased numbers of red blood transfusions (in first 28 days of life) than infants in DCC group (4.1±3.9 vs. 2.8±2.2, P=0.04).ConclusionAmong infants born at an average GA of 24 weeks', DCC appears safe, logistically feasible, and offers hematological and circulatory advantages compared with ICC. A more comprehensive appraisal of this practice is needed.
Project description:ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to compare outpatient respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) immunoprophylaxis (IP) use and relative RSV hospitalization (RSVH) rates for infants <29 weeks' gestational age (wGA) versus term infants before and after the 2014 American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) policy change.Study designInfants were identified in the MarketScan Commercial and Multi-State Medicaid databases. Outpatient RSV IP receipt and relative <29 wGA/term hospitalization risks in 2012 to 2014 and 2014 to 2016 were assessed using rate ratios and a difference-in-difference model.ResultsOutpatient RSV IP receipt by infants <29 wGA and aged <3 months in the Commercial and Medicaid populations and those aged 3 to <6 months in the Medicaid population declined after 2014. Relative RSVH risks for infants <29 wGA were numerically greater after 2014, with infants aged <3 months and Medicaid infants experiencing the greatest increases. Difference-in-difference results indicated a significantly increased relative risk of RSVH for infants <29 wGA versus term (both cohorts aged 0 to <6 months) in the Medicaid-insured population (1.68, p = 0.0054). A nonsignificant increase of similar magnitude occurred in the commercially insured population (1.57, p = 0.2867).ConclusionThe 2014 policy change was associated with a decrease in RSV IP use and an increase in RSVH risk among otherwise healthy infants <29 wGA.
Project description:ImportanceCranial ultrasound (CUS) findings are routinely used to identify preterm infants at risk for impaired neurodevelopment, and neurobehavioral examinations provide information about early brain function. The associations of abnormal findings on early and late CUS with neurobehavior at neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) discharge have not been reported.ObjectiveTo examine the associations between early and late CUS findings and infant neurobehavior at NICU discharge.Design, setting, and participantsThis prospective cohort study included infants enrolled in the Neonatal Neurobehavior and Outcomes in Very Preterm Infants Study between April 2014 and June 2016. Infants born before 30 weeks' gestational age were included. Exclusion criteria were maternal age younger than 18 years, maternal cognitive impairment, maternal inability to read or speak English or Spanish, maternal death, and major congenital anomalies. Overall, 704 infants were enrolled. The study was conducted at 9 university-affiliated NICUs in Providence, Rhode Island; Grand Rapids, Michigan; Kansas City, Missouri; Honolulu, Hawaii; Winston-Salem, North Carolina; and Torrance and Long Beach, California. Data were analyzed from September 2019 to September 2021.ExposuresEarly CUS was performed at 3 to 14 days after birth and late CUS at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age or NICU discharge. Abnormal findings were identified by consensus of standardized radiologists' readings.Main outcomes and measuresNeurobehavioral examination was performed using the NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale (NNNS).ResultsAmong the 704 infants enrolled, 675 had both CUS and NNNS data (135 [20.0%] Black; 368 [54.5%] minority race or ethnicity; 339 [50.2%] White; 376 [55.7%] male; mean [SD] postmenstrual age, 27.0 [1.9] weeks). After covariate adjustment, lower attention (adjusted mean difference, -0.346; 95% CI, -0.609 to -0.083), hypotonicity (mean difference, 0.358; 95% CI, 0.055 to 0.662), and poorer quality of movement (mean difference, -0.344; 95% CI, -0.572 to -0.116) were observed in infants with white matter damage (WMD). Lower attention (mean difference, -0.233; 95% CI, -0.423 to -0.044) and hypotonicity (mean difference, 0.240; 95% CI, 0.014 to 0.465) were observed in infants with early CUS lesions.Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study of preterm infants, certain early CUS lesions were associated with hypotonicity and lower attention around term-equivalent age. WMD was associated with poor attention, hypotonicity, and poor quality of movement. Infants with these CUS lesions might benefit from targeted interventions to improve neurobehavioral outcomes during their NICU hospitalization.
Project description:Abstract Objectives The association between poor growth and neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) among preterm infants is well-established whether due to inadequate nutrition, adverse events or both. The present study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of 36-week anthropometric measures, including corresponding < 10th and < 3rd percentile cut points to predict NDI in preterm infants. Methods This study included data from the PreM Growth Cohort Study for preterm infants < 30 weeks of gestational age (GA) and birth weights < 1500 grams. The accuracy with which measured weight, length and head circumference z-scores can predict cognitive impairment (Bayley-III Cognitive Composite score < 80) at 21 months corrected age (born in 2005–2014) and intellectual impairment (Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-3rd and 4th Edition (Intellectual test) score < 70) at 3-years corrected age (born in 2001–2014) was determined by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Results At 21 months 98/621 (15.8%) of infants had low Bayley scores and 57/613 (9.3%) had low Intellectual test scores at 3 years. None of the AUROCs exceeded 0.6 and none were significantly different from 0.5. Sensitivities and specificities for the 10th and 3rd percentile cut points were equally poor, with most not exceeding 70% (Figures). The findings were similar between the Fenton 2013 and INTERGROWTH 2015 growth charts. The addition of morbidities increased the accuracy of predicting cognitive impairments except for infants with cerebral palsy, other morbidities had relatively marginal associations with impairment. Conclusions Preterm infant measures of weight, length, and head circumference z-scores at 36 weeks, including corresponding < 10th and < 3rd percentile cut points, are not accurate as predictors of NDI. This study confirms previous findings that preterm infants show some “catch up” in weight relative to growth references between 37–44 weeks GA. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03064022 Funding Sources Canadian Foundation for Dietetic Research. Supporting Tables, Images and/or Graphs
Project description:ObjectiveTo determine whether a Bayley-III motor composite score of 85 may overestimate moderate-severe motor impairment by analyzing Bayley-III motor components and developing cut-point scores for each.Study designRetrospective study of 1183 children born <27 weeks gestation at NICHD Neonatal Research Network centers and evaluated at 18-22 months corrected age. Gross Motor Function Classification System determined gross motor impairment. Statistical analyses included linear and logistic regression and sensitivity/specificity.ResultsBayley-III motor composite scores were strong indicators of gross/fine motor impairment. A motor composite cut-point of 73 markedly improved the specificity for identifying gross and/or fine motor impairment (94% compared with a specificity of 76% for the proposed new cut-point of 85). A Fine Motor Scaled Score <3 differentiated mild from moderate-severe fine motor impairment.ConclusionsThis study indicates that a Bayley-III motor composite score of 85 may overestimate impairment. Further studies are needed employing term controls and longer follow-up.