Role of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Advanced EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Wiest N
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8634952 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:(1) Background: We performed a meta-analysis to examine whether combined epidermal growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) increases treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). (2) Methods: Articles from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched. Proportions and odds ratios (ORs) of the pooled incidence of overall and organ-specific trAEs in combination EGFR-TKI and ICI were compared to TKI monotherapy. (3) Results: Eight studies fulfilled our selection criteria. Any-grade organ-specific trAEs were more common in combination EGFR-TKI and ICI than TKI monotherapy (skin: OR = 1.19, p = 0.012; gastrointestinal tract: OR = 1.04, p = 0.790; ILD: OR = 1.28, p = 0.001). Grade ≥ 3 trAEs were also more frequent in combination treatment (skin: OR = 1.13, p = 0.082; gastrointestinal tract: OR = 1.13, p = 0.076; ILD: OR = 1.16, p = 0.003). (4) Conclusions: A higher proportion of grade ≥3 skin and gastrointestinal trAEs and ILDs was observed in combination TKI and ICI compared to TKI alone. Caution has to be taken when interpreting the results owing to the small number of studies included in this meta-analysis.
| S-EPMC9102470 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy has resulted in significant survival benefits in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without increasing toxicity. However, the utilisation of immunotherapy for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains unclear, with a scarcity of systematic comparisons of therapeutic effects and safety of immunotherapy in these two major lung cancer subtypes. Herein, we aimed to provide a comprehensive landscape of immunotherapy and systematically review its specific efficacy and safety in advanced lung cancer, accounting for histological types.MethodsWe identified studies assessing immunotherapy for lung cancer with predefined endpoints, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAE), from PubMed, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane library. A random-effects or fixed-effect model was adopted according to different settings.ResultsOverall, 38 trials with 20,173 patients with lung cancer were included in this study. ICI therapy resulted in a significantly prolonged survival in both patients with NSCLC and SCLC when compared with chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-0.79] and [HR = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.75-0.90], respectively). The magnitude of disease control and survival benefits appeared superior with ICI plus standard of care (SOC) when compared with SOC alone. OS and PFS advantages were observed only when immunotherapy was employed as the first-line treatment in patients with SCLC.ConclusionICI therapy is a promising therapeutic option in patients with NSCLC and SCLC. ICI plus SOC can be recommended as the optimal first-line treatment for patients with SCLC, and double-target ICIs combined with SOC are recommended in patients with NSCLC as both the first and subsequent lines of treatment. Additionally, non-first-line immunotherapy is not recommended in patients with SCLC.
| S-EPMC8403352 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Targeted therapies are efficient in the context of oncogenic driver mutations. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant lung cancers represent a distinct subset of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with marked sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Despite the high response rate to EGFR TKIs in EGFR-mutant lung cancer, resistance and tumor recurrence are unavoidable. Therapeutic options are restricted in patients after exhaustion of targeted therapies. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent a novel therapeutic option for advanced NSCLC with significant overall survival benefit in registration trials. No superiority in terms of long-term survival was observed in the EGFR mutation subgroup when ICIs were given as monotherapy in second-line treatment in earlier studies. Thus, the appropriate application of ICIs to patients harboring EGFR mutations remains an important field of ongoing research. Here, we discuss different immune checkpoint blockade strategies, including ICIs alone and in combination with TKIs, chemotherapy, radiation, and antiangiogenic agents in EGFR-mutant NSCLC as first-line and subsequent treatments. We also summarize the evidence concerning the heterogeneous molecular features and immune signatures of EGFR mutations and their associations with ICI therapy outcomes. This study was performed to improve our understanding of the optimal mode of immune-based treatment approaches in EGFR-mutant NSCLC.
| S-EPMC7285948 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceHigh body mass index (BMI) is independently associated with overall survival benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with melanoma, yet whether BMI is associated with outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with atezolizumab remains unknown.ObjectiveTo examine whether BMI is associated with survival outcomes and adverse events in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with atezolizumab.Design, setting, and participantsA pooled analysis of individual patient-level data from 4 international, multicenter clinical trials was performed. Two were single-arm phase 2 trials (BIRCH [data cutoff of May 28, 2015] and FIR [data cutoff of January 7, 2015]), and 2 were 2-arm randomized clinical trials (POPLAR [phase 2; data cutoff of May 8, 2015] and OAK [phase 3; data cutoff of July 7, 2016]). Patients with advanced NSCLC previously untreated or treated with at least 1 line of systemic therapy, with measurable disease and good organ function and without contraindications for chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, were included in these trials. Data analyses were performed from February 28, 2019, to September 30, 2019.InterventionsThe control group was treated with docetaxel once every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects occurred in POPLAR and OAK. The experimental group was treated with atezolizumab once every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects occurred in all available trials.Main outcomes and measuresAssociation between BMI and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-related adverse events. Intention-to-treat analysis was conducted.ResultsAdequate data were available for 2110 patients from a total pool of 2261 across 4 trials. Of those 2110, 1434 patients (median age, 64 years [range, 57-70 years]; 890 men [62%]) received atezolizumab and 676 patients (median age, 63 years[range, 57-69 years]; 419 men [62%]) received docetaxel. There was a linear association between increasing BMI and OS in patients treated with atezolizumab. Obesity (BMI ≥30 [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared]) was associated with significantly improved OS in patients treated with atezolizumab, but not in those who received docetaxel after adjusting for confounding variables. The association between BMI and OS/PFS was the strongest in the high PD-L1 expression subgroup. Overall survival for patients with the highest category of PD-L1 expression (≥50% of tumor cells or ≥10% of tumor-infiltrating immune cells; n = 436) had hazard ratios of 0.36 (95% CI, 0.21-0.62) for the group with obesity and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.48-0.98) for the group with overweight. Patients with the highest category of PD-L1 expression had PFS hazard ratios of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.49-0.94) for the group with obesity and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.56-0.92) for the group with overweight. Treatment-related adverse events were not associated with BMI.Conclusions and relevanceHigh BMI appears to be independently associated with improved survival with atezolizumab in patients with NSCLC, raising the possibility that baseline BMI should be considered as a stratification factor in future immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy trials.
| S-EPMC6990855 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically changed the first-line treatment pattern of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without driver gene alterations. However, the optimal choice for second-line treatment after initial treatment with ICIs is unclear. This study aimed to clarify the efficacy and safety of ICI rechallenge therapy in locally advanced and advanced NSCLC.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the histories of 224 patients with locally advanced or advanced NSCLC treated with programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors alone or in combination with chemotherapy and/or antiangiogenic therapy in first-line treatment. Progression-free survival 2 (PFS2) was the time from the first defined progress disease (PD) to the second disease progression or death. Efficacy evaluation was performed directly in accordance with RECIST v1.1 criteria. Adverse events (AEs) were graded following the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. Survival data were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method or Cox survival regression model and compared using the log-rank test in overall cohort and other subgroups.ResultsThere were no significant differences in objective response rate (ORR) and median PFS2 (mPFS2) between the ICI rechallenge group and non-rechallenge group (ORR: 10.3% vs. 15.3%, P=0.308; mPFS2: 5.33 vs. 4.40 months, P=0.715). And the ICI rechallenge group showed no new safety signals compared with non-rechallenge group. In ICI rechallenge group, patients resistant to first-line immunotherapy had a lower ORR and shorter PFS2 compared with those who responded to initial ICIs treatment (ORR: 7.0% vs. 17.6%, P=0.038; mPFS2: 3.68 vs. 5.91 months, P=0.014). No significant difference in mPFS2 was observed among different second-line treatment groups (P=0.362). Radiotherapy in second-line treatment and ICI rechallenge therapy were not the main factors affecting PFS2.ConclusionsICI rechallenge therapy beyond disease progression did not improve clinical outcomes in patients with NSCLC, but no new safety signals emerged. However, patients with favorable response to initial ICIs treatment still showed significant efficacy of subsequent ICI rechallenge therapy.
| S-EPMC11009570 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAlthough immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) generally show poor therapeutic efficacy in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, certain research indicate that a small proportion of these patients do respond to ICIs. The present study sought to identify the features of patients with EGFR mutations who might benefit from ICIs from multiple studies and discussed the optimal treatment paradigm for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutations.MethodsThe profiles of 114 advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations who received ICIs treatment were retrospectively reviewed. EGFR subtypes, programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, and clinical characteristics regarding their impact on the efficacy of ICIs were investigated.ResultsPatients with major EGFR mutations (L858R or 19Del) had a shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and a lower objective response rate (ORR) as compared to patients with rare (20ins or G719X) and other EGFR mutations. Although not statistically significant, median overall survival (OS) tended to be longer in patients with negative (<1%) PD-L1 expression than with positive (≥1%) PD-L1 expression (15.61 vs. 7.40 months, p = 0.138). Median PFS and OS were significantly shorter in heavily treated patients (prior lines of therapy ≥3 lines vs. <3 lines: mPFS, 1.80 vs. 2.50 months, p = 0.003; mOS, 6.70 vs. 14.00 months, p = 0.031). ORR was also lower in patients who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy compared to in those <3 prior lines of therapy (0.00% vs. 21.67%, p = 0.002).ConclusionPatients with major EGFR mutations showed poorer responses to ICIs than those with rare EGFR mutations. EGFR-mutated patients with lower PD-L1 expression showed a trend towards a longer OS after receiving ICIs. ICIs should be administered as early as possible to previously treated EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients. ICI-based combined therapies may be a direction for treatment of these patient subtypes in the future.
| S-EPMC9388930 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a standard care in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its application to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant NSCLC patients is confronted with drug resistance. This study aimed to clarify the potential role of Yes1-associated transcriptional regulator (YAP1) in ICIs treatment for EGFR-mutant NSCLC population.MethodsAll the clinical data of NSCLC were downloaded from Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) for GSE11969 and GSE72094. Based on YAP1 expression, all the NSCLC patients including the EGFR-mutant and EGFR-wildtype (WT) patients were divided into two groups, YAP1_High and YAP1_Low. Using cBioPortal, genetic alterations were analyzed for identification of immunogenicity in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. MR analysis was used to analyze the hub gene of EGFR. The infiltration of immune cells and the expression of the identified tumor-associated antigens were identified with TIMER. By graph learning-based dimensionality reduction analysis, the immune landscape was visualized. Moreover, survival analysis was performed to verify the predictive value of YAP1 in ICIs treatment for EGFR-mutant NSCLC population using Ren's research data (NCT03513666).ResultsYAP1 was a poor prognostic factor of EGFR-mutant NSCLC population rather than lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients. MR analysis revealed that the EGFR gene regulated YAP1 expression. YAP1 was identified as a hub gene closely associated with immunosuppressive microenvironment and poor prognosis in EGFR-mutant NSCLC population in TCGA LUAD. Tumors with YAP1_High showed an immune-"cold" and immunosuppressive phenotype, whereas those with YAP1_Low demonstrated an immune-"hot" and immunoactive phenotype. More importantly, it was verified that YAP1_High subpopulation had a significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after ICIs treatment in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients in the clinical trial.ConclusionsYAP1 mediates immunosuppressive microenvironment and poor prognosis in EGFR-mutant NSCLC population. YAP1 is a novel negative biomarker of ICIs treatment in EGFR-mutant NSCLC population. Clinical Trials. This trial is registered with NCT03513666.
| S-EPMC10307059 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThere is an unmet need to identify novel predictive biomarkers that enable more accurate identification of individuals who can benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. The US FDA recently approved tumor mutational burden (TMB) score of ≥ 10 mut/Mb as a threshold for pembrolizumab treatment of solid tumors. Our study aimed to test the hypothesis that specific gene mutation signature may predict the efficacy of ICI therapy more precisely than high TMB (≥ 10).MethodsWe selected 20 candidate genes that may predict for the efficacy of ICI therapy by the analysis of data from a published cohort of 350 advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Then, we compared the influences of various gene mutation signatures on the efficacy of ICI treatment. They were also compared with PD-L1 and TMB. The Kaplan-Meier method was utilized to evaluate the prognosis univariates, while selected univariates were adopted to develop a systematic nomogram.ResultsA high mutation signature, where three or more of the 20 selected genes were mutated, was associated with the significant benefits of ICI therapy. Specifically, patients with high mutation signature were confirmed to have better prognosis for ICI treatment, compared with those with wild type (the median PFS: 7.17 vs. 2.90 months, p = 0.0004, HR = 0.47 (95% [CI]:0.32-0.68); the median OS: unreached vs. 9 months, p = 1.8E-8, HR = 0.17 (95% [CI]:0.11-0.25)). Moreover, those patients with the high mutation signature achieved significant ICI treatment benefits, while there was no difference of OS and PFS between patients without the signature but TMB-H (≥ 10) and those without the signature and low TMB(< 10). Finally, we constructed a novel nomogram to evaluate the efficacy of ICI therapy.ConclusionA high mutational signature with 3 or more of the 20-gene panel could provide more accurate predictions for the outcomes of ICI therapy than TMB ≥ 10 in NSCLC patients.
| S-EPMC10288780 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is a predictor of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment efficacy. The clinical efficacy of ICIs for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring major mutations, such as EGFR or ALK mutations, is limited. We genotyped 190 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinomas who received nivolumab or pembrolizumab monotherapy, and examined the efficacy in NSCLC patients with or without major mutations. Among the patients enrolled in the genotyping study, 47 patients harbored EGFR mutations, 25 patients had KRAS mutations, 5 patients had a HER2 mutation, 6 patients had a BRAF mutation, and 7 patients had ALK rearrangement. The status of PD-L1 expression was evaluated in 151 patients, and the rate of high PD-L1 expression (?50%) was significantly higher in patients with ALK mutations. The progression-free survival was 0.6 (95% CI: 0.2-2.1) months for ALK-positive patients and 1.8 (95% CI: 1.2-2.1) months for EGFR-positive patients. All patients with ALK rearrangement showed disease progression within three months from the initiation of anti-PD-1 treatment. Our data suggested that ICI treatment was significantly less efficacious in patients with ALK rearrangement than in patients with EGFR mutations, and PD-L1 expression was not a critical biomarker for ICI treatment for patients with one of these mutations.
| S-EPMC7178012 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceDerived neutrophils/(leukocytes minus neutrophils) ratio (dNLR) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level have been correlated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) outcomes in patients with melanoma.ObjectiveTo determine whether pretreatment dNLR and LDH are associated with resistance to ICIs in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Design, setting, and participantsMulticenter retrospective study with a test (n = 161) and a validation set (n = 305) treated with programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors in 8 European centers, and a control cohort (n = 162) treated with chemotherapy only. Complete blood cell counts, LDH, and albumin levels were measured before ICI treatment. A lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) based on dNLR greater than 3 and LDH greater than upper limit of normal (ULN) was developed, characterizing 3 groups (good, 0 factors; intermediate, 1 factor; poor, 2 factors).Main outcomes and measuresThe primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and disease control rate (DCR).ResultsIn the pooled ICI cohort (N = 466), 301 patients (65%) were male, 422 (90%) were current or former smokers, and 401 (87%) had performance status of 1 or less; median age at diagnosis was 62 (range, 29-86) years; 270 (58%) had adenocarcinoma and 159 (34%) had squamous histologic subtype. Among 129 patients with PD-L1 data, 96 (74%) had PD-L1 of at least 1% by immunohistochemical analysis, and 33 (26%) had negative results. In the test cohort, median PFS and OS were 3 (95% CI, 2-4) and 10 (95% CI, 8-13) months, respectively. A dNLR greater than 3 and LDH greater than ULN were independently associated with OS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.22; 95% CI, 1.23-4.01 and HR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.32-4.76, respectively). Median OS for poor, intermediate, and good LIPI was 3 months (95% CI, 1 month to not reached [NR]), 10 months (95% CI, 8 months to NR), and 34 months (95% CI, 17 months to NR), respectively, and median PFS was 2.0 (95% CI, 1.7-4.0), 3.7 (95% CI, 3.0-4.8), and 6.3 (95% CI, 5.0-8.0) months (both P < .001). Disease control rate was also correlated with dNLR greater than 3 and LDH greater than ULN. Results were reproducible in the ICI validation cohort for OS, PFS, and DCR, but were nonsignificant in the chemotherapy cohort.Conclusions and relevancePretreatment LIPI, combining dNLR greater than 3 and LDH greater than ULN, was correlated with worse outcomes for ICI, but not for chemotherapy, suggesting that LIPI can serve as a potentially useful tool when selecting ICI treatment, raising the hypothesis that the LIPI might be useful for identifying patients unlikely to benefit from treatment with an ICI.
| S-EPMC5885829 | biostudies-literature