Dataset Information

The Association of Atrial Fibrillation Before Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With 1-Year Outcome in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients.

ABSTRACT:

Background

We aimed to determine the association of atrial fibrillation (AF) with 1-year outcome in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods

Patients (n = 8830) enrolled in the Trial of Routine Aspiration Thrombectomy with PCI vs PCI Alone in Patients With STEMI (TOTAL) were followed for 1 year. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, recurrent myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, or new or worsening class IV heart failure. The presence or absence of AF was determined from a single pre-PCI electrocardiogram.

Results

Patients with AF (n = 437; 4.9%) were older, and more often had a history of stroke, hypertension, or myocardial infarction. The rate of the primary outcome was higher in the AF group than in the sinus rhythm (SR) group (17.4% vs 7.4%, P < 0.001), as was the rate of cardiovascular death (9.8% vs 3.3%, P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, AF was independently predictive of the primary outcome (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-2.16, P < 0.001), cardiovascular death (aHR 1.69; 95% CI, 1.19-2.40, P = 0.003), all-cause mortality (aHR 1.63; 95% CI, 1.18-2.24, P = 0.003), and severe heart failure (aHR 1.96; 95% CI, 1.25-3.07, P = 0.003). Among patients who were in SR, the primary outcome occurred in 307 of 4252 (7.2%) in the thrombectomy group and 310 of 4141 (7.5%) in the PCI alone group, and among those with AF, these rates were respectively 42 of 218 (19.3%) and 34 of 219 (15.5%) (P _interaction = 0.26).

Conclusions

In STEMI patients, AF on the pre-PCI electrocardiogram is associated with a higher risk of the primary composite cardiovascular outcome, all-cause and cardiovascular death, and severe heart failure during 1-year follow-up than it is in patients with SR.

SUBMITTER: Anttonen E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8636243 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:AimsThere are limited contemporary data on the use of initial fibrinolysis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock (STEMI-CS). This study sought to compare the outcomes of STEMI-CS receiving initial fibrinolysis vs. primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI).MethodsUsing the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample from 2009 to 2017, a comparative effectiveness study of adult (>18 years) STEMI-CS admissions receiving pre-hospital/in-hospital fibrinolysis were compared with those receiving PPCI. Admissions with alternate indications for fibrinolysis and STEMI-CS managed medically or with surgical revascularization (without fibrinolysis) were excluded. Outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality, development of non-cardiac organ failure, complications, hospital length of stay, hospitalization costs, use of palliative care, and do-not-resuscitate status.ResultsDuring 2009-2017, 5297 and 110 452 admissions received initial fibrinolysis and PPCI, respectively. Compared with those receiving PPCI, the fibrinolysis group was more often non-White, with lower co-morbidity, and admitted on weekends and to small rural hospitals (all P < 0.001). In the fibrinolysis group, 95.3%, 77.4%, and 15.7% received angiography, PCI, and coronary artery bypass grafting, respectively. The fibrinolysis group had higher rates of haemorrhagic complications (13.5% vs. 9.9%; P < 0.001). The fibrinolysis group had comparable all-cause in-hospital mortality [logistic regression analysis: 28.8% vs. 28.5%; propensity-matched analysis: 30.8% vs. 30.3%; adjusted odds ratio 0.97 (95% confidence interval 0.90-1.05); P = 0.50]. The fibrinolysis group had comparable rates of acute organ failure, hospital length of stay, rates of palliative care referrals, do-not-resuscitate status use, and lesser hospitalization costs.ConclusionsThe use of initial fibrinolysis had comparable in-hospital mortality than those receiving PPCI in STEMI-CS in the contemporary era in this large national observational study.

Project description:Preinfarction angina may act as a clinical surrogate of ischemic preconditioning that may reduce infarct size and improve mortality in the setting of thrombolytic therapy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. However, the benefits of preinfarction angina in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting is inconclusive because of the greater achievement of infarct artery patency and speed of reperfusion.To identify a homogeneous population, we performed a retrospective analysis of 1031 patients admitted with a first ST-elevation myocardial infarction with ischemic times between 1 and 6 hours who received primary percutaneous coronary intervention. We identified 245 patients who had occluded arteries on presentation, of which 79 patients had documented preinfarction angina defined as chest pain within 24 hours of infarction. Infarct size was measured as the peak creatine kinase level, a metric supported in a subgroup by late enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Patients with preinfarction angina (n=79) had a 50% reduction in infarct size compared with those patients without preinfarction angina (n=166) by both peak creatine kinase (1094±75 IU/L versus 2270±102 IU/L; P<0.0001) and creatine kinase area under curve (18 420±18 941 versus 36 810±21 741 IU/h per liter; P<0.0001) despite having identical ischemic times (185±8 minutes versus 181±5 minutes; P=0.67) and angiographic area at risk (24.1±1.2% versus 25.3±0.9%; P=0.43). There was an absolute 4% improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction before discharge in those patients with preinfarction angina (P<0.02).The occurrence of preinfarction angina is associated with significant myocardial protection in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting during ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Because preinfarction angina is relatively common, it is important that these patients be identified in clinical trials investigating therapies designed to reduce reperfusion injury and infarct size.