Hybrid convergent ablation versus endocardial catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Introduction
Endocardial catheter ablation (ECA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) has limited efficacy. Hybrid convergent procedure (HCP) with both epicardial and endocardial ablation is a novel strategy for AF treatment. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HCP in AF ablation.Method
We performed a comprehensive literature search for studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of HCP compared with ECA for AF. The primary outcome was freedom of atrial arrhythmia (AA). The secondary outcome was the periprocedural complication rate. Pooled relative risk (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random effects model.Results
A total of eight studies, including 797 AF patients (mean age: 60.7 ± 9.8 years, 366 patients with HCP vs. 431 patients with ECA alone), were included. HCP showed a higher rate of freedom of AA compared with ECA (RR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.13-1.94, p = .004). However, HCP was associated with higher rates of periprocedural complications (RR: 3.64, 95% CI: 2.06-6.43; p = .00001). Moreover, the HCP had a longer procedure time and postprocedural hospital stay.Conclusions
Although hybrid ablation was associated with a higher success rate, this should be judged for increased periprocedural adverse events and extended hospital stay. Prospective large-scale randomized trials are needed to validate these results.
SUBMITTER: Mhanna M
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8637076 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Introduction Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia. Hybrid convergent ablation (HCA) is an emerging procedure for treating longstanding AF with promising results. HCA consists of a subxiphoid, surgical ablation followed by completion endocardial ablation. This meta-analysis of randomized control trials (RCT’s) and propensity score-matched studies aims to examine the efficacy and safety of HCA compared to endocardial catheter ablation (ECA) alone on patients with AF. Methods This review was written in accordance with preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses recommendations and guidance. The primary outcome for the analysis was freedom from AF (FFAF) at final follow up. Secondary outcomes were mortality and significant complications such as tamponade, sternotomy, esophageal injury, atrio-esophageal fistulae post procedurally. Results Four studies where included, with a total of 233 patients undergoing HCA and 189 patients undergoing ECA only. Pooled analysis demonstrated that HCA cohorts had significantly higher rates of FFAF than ECA cohorts, with an OR of 2.78 (95% CI 1.82–4.24, P < 0.01, I2 = 0). Major post-operative complications were observed in significantly more patients in the HCA group, with an OR of 5.14 (95% CI 1.70–15.54, P < 0.01). There was only one death reported in the HCA cohorts, with no deaths in the ECA cohort. Conclusion HCA is associated with a significantly higher FFAF than ECA, however, it is associated with increased post-procedural complications. There was only one death in the HCA cohort. Large RCT’s comparing the HCA and ECA techniques may further validate these results. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13019-022-01930-7.
| S-EPMC9375401 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesIn the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), the efficacy and safety of epicardial thoracoscopic ablation (TA) versus endocardial catheter ablation (CA) using radiofrequency energy remains unclear. This meta-analysis was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of each ablation technique using a pooled comparative analysis.MethodsStudies comparing the efficacy and safety of TA and CA were identified by searching electronic databases. Those that reported patients' freedom from atrial arrhythmia and significant side effects were included.ResultsThree randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and two retrospective cohort studies with a total of 587 patients were included in the meta-analysis (273 patients underwent TA and 314 patients underwent CA). The proportion of patients who were free of atrial arrhythmia without antiarrhythmic drugs during 12 months of follow-up was significantly higher after TA than after CA in the RCTs [P < 0.001; relative risk (RR), 1.77; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.34-2.32] and in the retrospective cohort studies (P = 0.010; RR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.12-2.51). The incidence of significant side effects during the post-procedural period was significantly higher in the TA group than in the CA group in both the RCT (P = 0.007; RR, 7.23; 95% CI, 1.71-30.49) and the retrospective cohort studies (P = 0.020; RR, 4.39; 95% CI, 1.33-14.46).ConclusionsBased on the available data, TA was found to be more effective than CA in achieving freedom from atrial arrhythmia; however, TA had a higher rate of immediate post-procedural complications than CA.
| S-EPMC4986775 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundDespite the successful creation of complex lesion sets during hybrid ablation (HA), reoccurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF), and/or atrial arrhythmia and procedural complications still occur. The main objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety between HA and transcatheter ablation (TA).MethodsWe searched Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) database up to October 2017. Studies that satisfied our predefined inclusion criteria were included. Of the 894 records, 4 studies encompassing 331 patients were included in our study. We assessed pooled data using random-effect or fixed-effect model. The main endpoint was freedom of atrial arrhythmia after follow-up duration, secondary results were procedure time and intraoperative and postoperative adverse events. Similarly, tertiary outcomes were endocardial time, fluoroscopy time, and postoperative hospitalization.ResultsCompared with TA, HA treatment through mini-thoracotomy access improved superiority in freedom of atrial arrhythmia after follow-up duration (odds ratio [OR] = 6.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.63-16.90), but HA increased the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative adverse events for AF patients (OR = 2.98, 95% CI: 1.30-6.83). HA through either mini-thoracotomy or transdiaphragmatic/subxiphoid access had longer procedure time and postoperative hospitalization than TA. However, endocardial time was shorter than TA.ConclusionsFor AF patients, HA possessed of an overall superior outcome using mini-thoracotomy way to TA. Although HA had longer procedure time, it yielded a reduction in endocardial time. Meanwhile, we should pay attention to the significantly high risk of intraoperative and postoperative adverse events that the HA generated.
| S-EPMC6370058 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Combined 'hybrid' thoracoscopic and percutaneous atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is a strategy used to treat AF in patients with therapy-resistant symptomatic AF. We aimed to study efficacy and safety of single-stage hybrid AF ablation in patients with symptomatic persistent AF, or paroxysmal AF with failed endocardial ablation, and assess determinants of success and quality of life. METHODS:We included consecutive patients undergoing single-stage hybrid AF ablation. First, we performed epicardial ablation, via thoracoscopic access, to isolate the pulmonary veins and superior caval vein and to create a posterior left atrial box. Thereafter, isolation was assessed endocardially and complementary endocardial ablation was performed, followed by cavotricuspid isthmus ablation. Efficacy was assessed by 12-lead electrocardiography and 72-hour Holter monitoring after 3, 6 and 12 months. Recurrence was defined as AF/atrial flutter/tachycardia recorded by electrocardiography or Holter monitoring lasting >30?s during 1?year follow-up. RESULTS:Fifty patients were included, 57?±?9 years, 38 (76%) men, 5 (10%) paroxysmal, 34 (68%) persistent and 11 (22%) long-standing persistent AF. At 1?year 38 (76%) maintained sinus rhythm off antiarrhythmic drugs. Majority of recurrences were atrial flutter (9/12 patients). Success was associated with type of AF (p?=?0.039). Patients with paroxysmal AF had highest success, patients with longstanding persistent AF had lowest success. Seven (14%) patients had procedure-related complications. Quality of life improved after ablation in patients who maintained sinus rhythm. CONCLUSION:Success of single-stage hybrid AF ablation was 76% off antiarrhythmic drugs, being associated with type of AF. Quality of life improved significantly, Procedure-related complications occurred in 14%.
| S-EPMC6393682 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The treatment effect of the hybrid procedure, consisting of a thoracoscopic ablation followed by an endocardial radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA), is unclear. A total of 117 ablation-naïve patients who underwent either the staged hybrid procedure (n = 72) or RFCA alone (n = 105) for drug-refractory, non-valvular persistent or long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) were enrolled. The primary outcome is occurrence of total atrial arrhythmia, defined as a composite of AF, sustained atrial tachycardia (AT), and atypical atrial flutter (AFL) after index procedure. The mean age was 52.7 years. Eighty-four percentage of the patients were male. Patients with prior history of stroke and long-standing persistent AF were more prevalent in the hybrid group than RFCA group. The left atrial volume index was larger in the hybrid group (P<0.001). During 2.1 years of median follow-up, the incidence of total atrial arrhythmia was not different between the two groups (32.5% vs. 35.7%; adjusted hazard ratio: 0.64; 95% confidence interval: 0.36-1.14; P = 0.13). The AF recurrence was significantly lower in the hybrid group than in the RFCA group (29.6% vs. 34.9%; adjusted HR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.29-0.99; P = 0.046). The hospital stay was longer in the hybrid group than in the RFCA group (11 days vs. 4 days; P<0.001). A staged hybrid procedure may be an alternative choice for drug-refractory persistent AF, but it is no more effective than RFCA alone to eliminate atrial arrhythmias. Considering the long-length of stay and the morbidity, careful consideration should be given in selection of treatment strategy.
| S-EPMC6177159 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background:We evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the hybrid thoracoscopic endocardial epicardial ablation technique for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) in obese versus non-obese patients. Methods:Between January 2010 and January 2015, a cohort of 61 patients were retrospectively identified to undergo ablation of AF as a stand-alone procedure using a thoracoscopic, hybrid epicardial-endocardial technique. All patients underwent continuous 7-day Holter monitoring at 3, 6 months, 1 year and yearly thereafter. Results:A total of 40% of the obese cohort had persistent or long-standing AF, compared to 54.9% of the non-obese cohort. There were no deaths or conversion to cardiopulmonary bypass required. At 3-year follow-up, 60% of the obese group were in sinus rhythm (SR) with no episode of AF, atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia lasting 30 s off anti-arrhythmic drugs. This was compared to 70.6% in the non-obese group, with no significant difference between the groups (P=0.468). For success rates on anti-arrhythmic drugs, this was 80% in the obese group compared to 86% in the non-obese group at 3-year follow-up (P=0.637). No patient died and no thromboembolic/bleeding events or procedure-related complications occurred during the follow-up. Conclusions:In a retrospective cohort with approximately half with persistent or long-standing AF, thoracoscopic hybrid epicardial endocardial ablation proved to be equally effective and safe in obese versus non-obese patients. Current preliminary findings require further validation in multi-institutional prospective studies with larger sample sizes.
| S-EPMC5708470 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo evaluate the size and depth of linear lesions by in vitro testing with a custom-made radio frequency biparietal bipolar ablation catheter in a single-stage setting.MethodsA custom-made catheter was created to generate linear lesions around the left atrium and pulmonary veins of an ex vivo pig. Two frames were made, 1 epicardial and 1 endocardial. A continuous copper braid electrode and an alignment system consisting of 2 parallel rows of neodymium magnets were embedded in a flexible plastic support. After 24 hours of formalin conservation, samples of the left atrium of a freshly slaughtered pig were sliced in a cryotome, thus obtaining a sequence of 100-µm thick layers extending from the endocardial to the epicardial side. After being digitized through a scanner, these layers were evaluated using morphometric computer software. For each slice, we evaluated the maximum length of the lesions, the maximum epicardial length, the maximum endocardial length, the total area of the lesion, and the total volume.ResultsForty transmural lesions from 40 specimens were obtained. The results were the following (the number in parenthesis is the interquartile range in mm): lesion maximum length (L MAX) was 7.297 mm (0.006), epicardial maximum length (L EPI) was 7.291 mm (0.014), and endocardial maximum length was 7.291 mm (0.018). The total area and total volume were 1018.50 ± 36.51 mm2 and 101.85 ± 3.65 mm3, respectively.ConclusionsOur prototype showed very promising results. The next step will be to enhance the design for clinical application.
| S-EPMC8108111 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Introduction Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequently performed cardiac ablation procedure worldwide. The majority of ablations can now be performed safely with minimal radiation exposure or even without the use of fluoroscopy, thanks to advances in 3-dimensional electroanatomical mapping systems and/or intracardiac echocardiography. The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness of zero fluoroscopy (ZF) versus non-zero fluoroscopy (NZF) strategies for AF ablation procedures. Methods Electronic databases were searched and systematically reviewed for studies comparing procedural parameters and outcomes of ZF vs. NZF approaches in patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF. We used a random-effects model to derive the mean difference (MD) and risk ratios (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Our meta-analysis included seven studies comprising 1,593 patients. The ZF approach was found to be feasible in 95.1% of patients. Compared to the NZF approach, the ZF approach significantly reduced procedure time [mean difference (MD): −9.11 min (95% CI: −12.93 to −5.30 min; p < 0.01)], fluoroscopy time [MD: −5.21 min (95% CI: −5.51 to −4.91 min; p < 0.01)], and fluoroscopy dose [MD: −3.96 mGy (95% CI: −4.27 to −3.64; p < 0.01)]. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of total ablation time [MD: −104.26 s (95% CI: −183.37 to −25.14; p = 0.12)]. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the acute [risk ratio (RR): 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00–1.02; p = 0.72] and long-term success rates (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.90–1.03; p = 0.56) between the ZF and NZF methods. The complication rate was 2.76% in the entire study population and did not differ between the groups (RR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.41–2.15; p = 0.89). Conclusion The ZF approach is a feasible method for AF ablation procedures. It significantly reduces procedure time and radiation exposure without compromising the acute and long-term success rates or complication rates.
| S-EPMC10313423 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) is a risk factor for cognitive dysfunction. Although catheter ablation (CA) is one of the main treatments for AF, whether it can improve cognitive function in patients with AF remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the cognitive outcome post-CA procedure.MethodsTwo investigators independently searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang, and VIP databases from inception to September 2021 for all the potentially eligible studies. The outcomes of interest included dementia or cognitive disorder through scoring or recognized classification criteria. Heterogeneity was determined by using Cochrane's Q test and calculating the I 2. A random-effects model was used to incorporate the potential effects of heterogeneity. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the methodological quality of each included study, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) method was adopted to evaluate the quality of evidence.ResultThirteen studies including 40,868 patients were included, among which 12,086 patients received AF ablation. Meta-analysis indicated that patients with AF ablation had a lower risk of dementia incidence in comparison to patients with AF without ablation [hazard ratio (HR): 0.60, 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.84, p = 0.003 I 2 = 40%]. Significant differences were observed in the incidence of new-onset dementia [risk ratio (RR): 0.43, 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.65, p < 0.0001 I 2 = 84%]; the changes in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score [weighted mean difference (WMD): 1.00, 95% CI: 0.36 to 1.64, p < 0.005 I 2 = 0%] and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score (WMD: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.69 to 1.26, p < 0.00001 I 2 = 0%]. However, in subgroup analysis, we did not observe significant changes in MoCA score at < 3 months (WMD: 1.20, 95% CI: -0.19 to 2.58, p = 0.09 I 2 = 50%) and changes in cognitive function scores between the radiofrequency group and cryoballoon group [standard mean difference (SMD): 0.39, 95% CI: -0.47 to 1.24, p = 0.38 I 2 = 87%]. The NOS indicated that included studies were moderate to high quality, while the quality of evidence assessed by GRADE was low in 2 and very low in 2.ConclusionWe analyzed the related cognitive outcomes after AF ablation. In the overall population, AF ablation had a positive trend for improving cognitive function at >3 months post-procedure. However, AF ablation might not be related to the improvement of cognitive function at < 3 months.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier: CRD42021285198.
| S-EPMC9492882 | biostudies-literature
Project description:A significant proportion of patients' experience recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) despite pulmonary venous isolation (PVI), especially those with persistent AF. Isolation of the left atrial appendage (LAA) may reduce AF recurrence. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of LAA isolation in addition to PVI compared with PVI alone. We conducted a comprehensive search of electronic databases, up to April 21st, 2017, for all studies comparing the effect LAA electrical isolation or ligation in addition to PVI, as opposed to PVI alone, on the recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation. We used random-effects meta-analysis models to summarize the studies. One RCT and four observational studies enrolling 781 patients were retained. Four studies assessed the added effect of LAA catheter ablation, and one study evaluated the effect of LAA ligation with the aim of LAA electrical isolation. Four studies exclusively enrolled patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and one study predominantly enrolled patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. Follow-up ranged from 12 to 15 months. The addition of LAA isolation to PVI reduced AF recurrence compared with the latter alone (odds ratio (OR) = 0.19; 95% confidence intervals (CI) = 0.10-0.37; P < 0.00001). Left atrial appendage isolation was also associated with a reduction in AF recurrence after repeat ablation (OR = 0.40; CI = 0.25-0.65; P = 0.0003). The addition of LAA isolation to PVI was associated with a decrease in AF recurrence in patients with persistent AF. Further studies are needed to assess the effect on long-term risk of stroke.
| S-EPMC6174377 | biostudies-literature