Dataset Information

Conditional transcriptional relationships may serve as cancer prognostic markers.

ABSTRACT:

Background

While most differential coexpression (DC) methods are bound to quantify a single correlation value for a gene pair across multiple samples, a newly devised approach under the name Correlation by Individual Level Product (CILP) revolutionarily projects the summary correlation value to individual product correlation values for separate samples. CILP greatly widened DC analysis opportunities by allowing integration of non-compromised statistical methods.

Methods

Here, we performed a study to verify our hypothesis that conditional relationships, i.e., gene pairs of remarkable differential coexpression, may be sought as quantitative prognostic markers for human cancers. Alongside the seeking of prognostic gene links in a pan-cancer setting, we also examined whether a trend of global expression correlation loss appeared in a wide panel of cancer types and revisited the controversial subject of mutual relationship between the DE approach and the DC approach.

Results

By integrating CILP with classical univariate survival analysis, we identified up to 244 conditional gene links as potential prognostic markers in five cancer types. In particular, five prognostic gene links for kidney renal papillary cell carcinoma tended to condense around cancer gene ESPL1, and the transcriptional synchrony between ESPL1 and PTTG1 tended to be elevated in patients of adverse prognosis. In addition, we extended the observation of global trend of correlation loss in more than ten cancer types and empirically proved DC analysis results were independent of gene differential expression in five cancer types.

Conclusions

Combining the power of CILP and the classical survival analysis, we successfully fetched conditional transcriptional relationships that conferred prognosis power for five cancer types. Despite a general trend of global correlation loss in tumor transcriptomes, most of these prognosis conditional links demonstrated stronger expression correlation in tumors, and their stronger coexpression was associated with poor survival.

SUBMITTER: Yu H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8638091 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe SMYD family comprises a group of genes encoding lysine methyltransferases, which are closely related to tumorigenesis. However, a systematic understanding of their role in gastric cancer (GC) is lacking.MethodsUsing databases and tools such as the Cancer Genome Atlas, Human Protein Atlas, Kaplan-Meier Plotter, Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis, and Metascape, we comprehensively analyzed differences in SMYD expression and its prognostic value as well as the association of SMYDs with immune cell infiltration, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and microsatellite instability (MSI). We conducted functional enrichment analysis and explored a competing endogenous RNA mechanism regulating SMYD mRNA and protein levels in patients with GC.ResultsIn GC, the expression of SMYD2/3/4/5 mRNA was significantly upregulated, as opposed to that of SMYD1 mRNA, which was significantly downregulated. The protein levels of SMYDs were consistent with mRNA levels. SMYD1/2/4/5 was negatively correlated with overall survival; SMYD1/2/3/5 was negatively correlated with progression-free survival. Our SMYD-based signature and nomogram model may be useful for inferring the prognosis of GC. All SMYDs were closely associated with the infiltration of six immune cell types: uncharacterized, CD8+ T, CD4+ T, macrophage, endothelial, and B cells. TMB was significantly negatively correlated with SMYD1 expression, while a significant positive correlation was observed with SMYD2/5. Furthermore, MSI was significantly positively correlated with SMYD2/5 expression. Long non-coding RNAs, such as chr22-38_28785274-29006793.1, XLOC_002309, and CTD-2008N3.1, were suggested to regulate SMYD expression by sponging multiple microRNAs.ConclusionSMYDs are differentially expressed in GC and are thus potential prognostic markers. SMYD expression is closely related to immune infiltration, TMB, and MSI, all of which are closely related to the response to targeted immune therapy.