Dataset Information

The Prognostic Significance of PD1 and PDL1 Gene Expression in Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Immune checkpoint blockade therapy represents an extraordinary advance in lung cancer treatment. It is important to determine the expression of immune checkpoint genes, such as programmed cell death 1 (PD1) and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PDL1), to develop immunotherapeutic strategies. The aim of this study was to explore the association between PD1 and PDL1 gene expression and prognoses and outcomes in lung cancer.

Methods

This meta-analysis analyzed 1,251 patients from eight different microarray gene expression datasets and were evaluated for their prognostic implications and verified using another independent research.

Results

The mean expression levels of PDL1 in adenocarcinoma (AD) and squamous cell carcinoma (SC) were significantly higher in patients who died than in patients who did not. There was a trend toward incremental increases in PD1 and PDL1 expression significantly decreasing the risk of relapse and death among AD patients (HR = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.53 ~ 0.91; HR = 0.68; 95% CI = 0.54 ~ 0.84, respectively) and SC patients (HR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.32 ~ 0.89; HR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.57 ~ 1.00 respectively), as early-stage patients in this study were more likely to have high expression of both PD1 and PDL1 than late-stage patients (P-trend < 0.05). In contrast, late-stage SC patients expressing one or more of the genes at a high level had a significantly elevated risk of relapse (HR = 1.51; 95% CI = 1.07 ~ 2.11) and death (HR = 1.41; 95% CI = 1.08 ~ 1.84). This result was consistent with the validation data set.

Conclusion

These findings indicate that high expression of PD1 and PDL1 is associated with superior outcome in early-stage lung cancer but an adverse outcome in late-stage lung cancer. The expression levels of PD1 and PDL1 individually or jointly are potential prognostic factors for predicting patient outcomes in lung cancer.

SUBMITTER: Chang CH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8639141 | biostudies-literature | 2021

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The Prognostic Significance of PD1 and PDL1 Gene Expression in Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Chang Chih-Hao CH Shih Arthur Chun-Chieh AC Chang Ya-Hsuan YH Chen Hsuan-Yu HY Chao Ying-Ting YT Hsu Yi-Chiung YC

Frontiers in oncology 20211118

<h4>Background</h4>Immune checkpoint blockade therapy represents an extraordinary advance in lung cancer treatment. It is important to determine the expression of immune checkpoint genes, such as programmed cell death 1 (PD1) and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PDL1), to develop immunotherapeutic strategies. The aim of this study was to explore the association between PD1 and PDL1 gene expression and prognoses and outcomes in lung cancer.<h4>Methods</h4>This meta-analysis analyzed 1,251 patients ...[more]

PMID: 34868974

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionFAS has been implicated in the development of various cancers, but its involvement in lung cancer has not been systematically characterized. In this study, we performed data mining in online tumor databases to investigate the expression, methylation, alterations, protein interactions, co-expression and prognostic significance of FAS in lung cancer.MethodThe expression, prognostic significance and molecular interactions of FAS in lung cancer was mined and analyzed using GENT2, GEPIA2, UALCAN, cBioPortal, STRING, GeneMANIA, UCSC Xena, Enrichr, and OSluca databases. FAS expression was subsequently investigated at the protein level in samples from 578 lung cancer patients to understand its protein-level expression. In vitro validation of FAS gene expression was performed on H1299, H1993, A549 and HBE cell lines.ResultWe found that the expression of FAS was significantly downregulated in both lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) compared to normal lung tissue. In addition, we observed a higher level of FAS promoter methylation in LUSC tissue than in normal tissue. FAS alterations were rare (1.9%) in lung cancer samples, with deep deletions being more common than missense mutations, which occurred mainly in the TNFR-like cysteine-rich domain and the death domain. We also identified a list of proteins interacting with FAS and genes co-expressed with FAS, with LUAD having 11 co-expressed genes and LUSC having 90 co-expressed genes. Our results also showed that FAS expression has limited prognostic significance (HR=1.302, 95% CI=0.935-1.139, P=0.530). Protein level investigation revealed that FAS expression varied among individuals, with nTPM values ranging from 5.2 to 67.2.ConclusionThis study provides valuable insights into the involvements and characteristics of FAS in lung cancer. Further studies are needed to investigate the clinical significance of FAS alterations in lung cancer and to explore the potential of targeting FAS for therapeutic intervention.

Project description:The aim of the present study was to elucidate the significance of secreted protein acidic and cysteine rich (SPARC) expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in terms of clinicopathology, immune-cell infiltration and survival prognosis. A meta-analysis and bioinformatics analysis were performed using studies retrieved with PubMed, Web of Science, Wanfang Data and the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases. The meta-analysis suggested that, compared with normal tissues, SPARC expression was elevated in NSCLC tissues. The expression of SPARC was not significantly associated with TNM stage and lymph-node metastasis, and was positively associated with patient gender. Regarding the differential expression of SPARC and the relationship between expression levels and survival, the Oncomine database was consulted and Kaplan-Meier curves were drawn. It was indicated that SPARC mRNA expression levels were higher in NSCLC tissues than in normal tissues. Low expression of SPARC mRNA was negatively associated with overall survival, first progression survival and post-progression survival of patients. Further exploration of the relationship between SPARC expression and survival by univariate analysis indicated that TNM stage, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis and depth of infiltration of lung cancer were negatively associated with patient prognosis. Cox multifactorial analysis suggested that SPARC expression levels and TNM stage were risk factors significantly affecting the prognosis of patients with NSCLC. Analysis with the GEPIA and UALCAN databases further indicated that the mRNA expression level of SPARC in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) was higher than that in normal lung tissue, and the SPARC expression levels were affected by factors such as the TNM stage of lung cancer. A lower the level of SPARC mRNA expression was associated with a better relative survival prognosis of patients. In the Human Protein Atlas database, the expression level of SPARC protein was higher in LUAD and LUSC than in normal lung tissue. In the Timer database, the expression level of SPARC was closely linked to immune cells related to the occurrence of lung cancer, and the degree of immune-cell infiltration and SPARC protein expression were closely related to the prognosis of patients with lung cancer. Immune cells were indicated to exhibit significant inhibition of DNA proliferation mutation mechanisms in lung cancer (P<0.05). In summary, SPARC expression may be used as a valuable indicator of prognosis in patients with NSCLC, which may provide new approaches for preventative treatment.

Project description:BackgroundAnti-programmed cell death protein 1 and its ligand (anti-PD1/PDL1) have been proposed as a promising therapeutic option for advanced biliary tract cancer (aBTC). Given the scarce quantitative analyses of anti-PD1/PDL1 in aBTC, we thus did a meta-analysis to assess the benefits and risks of this emerging treatment strategy in patients with aBTC.MethodsPubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and meeting resources were searched for relevant studies. The main endpoints were median progression-free survival (mPFS), median overall survival (mOS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), any-grade adverse events (AEs), and grade 3-4 AEs.ResultsTwenty-eight studies with 1,338 participants were included. The best curative effect was found in the anti-PD1/PDL1 combined with anti-CTLA4 and chemotherapy group (mPFS: 12.4 months; mOS: 16.0 months; ORR: 45.1%; DCR: 95.0%), followed by the anti-PD1/PDL1 plus chemotherapy group (mPFS: 8.2 months; mOS: 14.8 months; ORR: 36.3%; DCR: 84.6%), the anti-PD1/PDL1 plus antiangiogenesis group (mPFS: 4.9 months; mOS: 10.2 months; ORR: 17.5%; DCR: 68.7%), the anti-PD1/PDL1 plus anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (anti-CTLA4) group (mPFS: 2.9 months; mOS: 8.3 months; ORR: 9.9%; DCR: 36.8%), and the anti-PD1/PDL1 monotherapy group (mPFS: 2.5 months; mOS: 7.6 months; ORR: 6.8%; DCR: 34.7%). Compared with anti-PD1-containing regimens, anti-PDL1-containing regimens achieved preferable mPFS (11.1 vs. 3.8 months), mOS (12.2 vs. 9.8 months), and ORR (23.7% vs. 17.4%), despite a similar DCR (61.1% vs. 61.3%). The mPFS, mOS, ORR, and DCR were 10.6 months, 15.8 months, 42.3%, and 88.6% of first-line anti-PD1/PDL1 and 3.0 months, 9.1 months, 11.6%, and 51.1% of second-line therapy or beyond, respectively. There were 80.6% and 34.0% of the patients suffering any-grade AEs and grade 3-4 AEs. Anti-PD1/PDL1 monotherapy might be considered as a safer alternative than combination regimens. Meanwhile, obvious toxicities in the first-line setting could not be neglected.ConclusionsAnti-PD1/PDL1 showed encouraging efficacy and acceptable safety profile in aBTC and, thus, could be an alternative treatment.

Dataset Information

The Prognostic Significance of PD1 and PDL1 Gene Expression in Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

The Prognostic Significance of PD1 and PDL1 Gene Expression in Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets