Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Pulmonary embolism (PE), depending on the severity, carries a high mortality and morbidity. Proper evaluation, especially in patients with low probability for PE, is important to avoid unnecessary diagnostic testing.Objective
To review the diagnostic utility of conventional versus age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff values in patients 50 years and older with suspected pulmonary embolism.Methods
Systematic review with univariant and bivariant meta-analysis.Data sources
We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, and EBSCO for studies published before September 20th, 2020. We cross checked the reference list of relevant studies that compares conventional versus age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff values in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.Study selection
We incl
SUBMITTER: Iwuji K
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8640977 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jan-Dec
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature