Dataset Information

Statin Therapy in Patients Undergoing Thoracic Aorta Replacement for Aortic Aneurysms.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Patients undergoing surgery for thoracic aortic aneurysms receive statin therapy out of proportion to cardiovascular comorbidity. We sought to determine the prevalence of statin use among patients presenting for thoracic aortic aneurysm surgery and investigate its effect on outcomes.

Methods

From January 1, 2005 to January 1, 2011, 1,839 consecutive patients underwent aortic replacement for degenerative thoracic aortic aneurysm at Cleveland Clinic. Of these, 771 (42%) were on statins preoperatively. Statin users (vs. nonstatin users) were older (65 ± 11 vs. 56 ± 16 years) and had more hypertension (78 vs. 59%). Propensity matching based on 56 preoperative variables other than lipid levels was used to compare outcomes among 570 matched patient pairs (74% of possible pairs).

Results

Propensity-matched statin and nonstatin users were aged 64 ± 11 years, 394 (69%) versus 387 (68%) were male, and 437 (77%) versus 442 (78%) had ascending aortic aneurysms, respectively. Overall, 25% of patients were followed for more than 8.2 years and 10% for more than 10 years. Perioperative outcomes were similar, including hospital mortality (11 [1.9%] vs. 5 [0.88%]) and stroke (22 [3.9%] vs. 13 [2.3%]), but 16 statin users (2.8%) versus 5 nonstatin users (0.88%) required temporary dialysis after surgery (p = 0.02). At 6 years, 3.7% of statin users versus 5.1% of nonstatin users (p[log-rank] = 0.5) underwent further aortic surgery, and at 10 years, mortality was 25% in both groups (p > 0.5).

Conclusion

Patients presenting for thoracic aortic aneurysm surgery frequently receive unnecessary statins. Additionally, statin use was associated with more postoperative renal failure, but not less intermediate-term risk for aortic reintervention or all-cause mortality after surgery. Therefore, presence of a thoracic aortic aneurysm should not be considered an indication for statin therapy in the absence of well-established indications.

SUBMITTER: Kindzelski BA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8642073 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Functional impairment of the aorta is a recognized complication of aortic and aortic valve disease. Aortic strain measurement provides effective quantification of mechanical aortic function, and 3-dimenional (3D) approaches may be desirable for serial evaluation. Computerized tomographic angiography (CTA) is routinely performed for various clinical indications, and offers the unique potential to study 3D aortic deformation. We sought to investigate the feasibility of performing 3D aortic strain analysis in a candidate population of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). METHODS:Twenty-one patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) referred for TAVR underwent ECG-gated CTA and echocardiography. CTA images were analyzed using a 3D feature-tracking based technique to construct a dynamic aortic mesh model to perform peak principal strain amplitude (PPSA) analysis. Segmental strain values were correlated against clinical, hemodynamic and echocardiographic variables. Reproducibility analysis was performed. RESULTS:The mean patient age was 81±6 years. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 52±14%, aortic valve area (AVA) 0.6±0.3 cm2 and mean AS pressure gradient (MG) 44±11 mmHg. CTA-based 3D PPSA analysis was feasible in all subjects. Mean PPSA values for the global thoracic aorta, ascending aorta, aortic arch and descending aorta segments were 6.5±3.0, 10.2±6.0, 6.1±2.9 and 3.3±1.7%, respectively. 3D PSSA values demonstrated significantly more impairment with measures of worsening AS severity, including AVA and MG for the global thoracic aorta and ascending segment (p<0.001 for all). 3D PSSA was independently associated with AVA by multivariable modelling. Coefficients of variation for intra- and inter-observer variability were 5.8 and 7.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:Three-dimensional aortic PPSA analysis is clinically feasible from routine ECG-gated CTA. Appropriate reductions in PSSA were identified with increasing AS hemodynamic severity. Expanded study of 3D aortic PSSA for patients with various forms of aortic disease is warranted.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Various studies evaluated the relationship between hypothermic circulatory arrest and neurological outcome in patients undergoing replacement of ascending aorta. The current analysis focuses on the effect of moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest (MHCA) on elderly patients. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of MHCA on neurological outcomes in elderly patients undergoing replacement of the ascending aorta. RESULTS:We retrospectively analyzed 905 consecutive patients, who underwent elective replacement of ascending aorta in MHCA (24?±?2?°C, nasopharyngeal) between 2001 and 2015. Patients with acute aortic dissection were excluded from this study. Patients were divided into two groups: those aged 75?years and older (elderly group 22.4%, n?=?203) and those younger than 75?years (younger group 77.6%, n?=?702). The average age was 63.2?±?10.2 in the young group vs. 78.7?±?3.0?years in elderly group (p?<?0.001). The elderly group had a significantly higher EuroSCORE II [26.7% (18.1, 36.3) vs. 11.6% (7.4, 19.9); p?<?0.001)]. The incidence of coronary heart disease (49.8% vs. 35.6%, p?<?0.001) and chronic renal failure (17.2% vs. 9.1%, p?=?0.001) was significantly higher in the elderly group. Intraoperatively, the time of MHCA [14?min (12, 17) vs. 15?min (12, 18); p?=?0.42], cardiopulmonary bypass [139?min (110, 183) vs. 144?min (113, 189); p?=?0.225], and cross-clamping [91?min (63, 116) vs. 92?min (65, 127); p?=?0.348] was similar in both groups. Postoperatively, a higher incidence of delirium was significantly reported in the elderly group (24.1% vs. 9.0%, p?<?0.001). However, there was no significant difference regarding neurological complications between both groups. A 30-day mortality was acceptable for the elderly group, but significantly higher compared with the younger group (7.1% vs. 3.5%, p?=?0.031). CONCLUSIONS:Our study suggests that surgical replacement of the ascending aorta in MHCA can also be applied safely in elderly patients without increasing the risk of severe neurological complications.

Project description:BackgroundLimited studies have focused on the performance of self-expandable valves (SEVs) and balloon-expandable valves (BEVs) in patients with dilatated ascending aorta (AA) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The present study compared the performance of widely used Edwards BEVs and domestic SEVs in patients with dilatated AA among Chinese population.MethodsWe identified and reviewed 207 patients who had baseline AA diameter ≥40 mm and underwent transfemoral TAVR. Patients were divided into two groups: SEV and BEV. The SEVs were locally manufactured valves that have received Chinese regulatory approval (Venus-A, Taurus One, and VitaFlow), while the BEVs were Edwards Sapien XT and Sapien3. Procedural device success and post-procedural changes of AA diameters were compared.ResultsThe sample size of SEV group was larger than that of BEV group because BEVs were not available in China in the early clinical practice. The overall device success was slightly lower in SEV group compared with BEV group (84.2% vs. 95.8%, P=0.213). However, in the univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses, only bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) was found to be an independent risk factor for device failure (OR: 2.632, CI: 1.107-6.257, P=0.029). During the median follow-up of 21 months, no statistical difference was found between the two groups regarding the overall survival (83.1%±4.7% vs. 95.8%±4.1%, P=0.533), and no aortic dissection nor rupture was observed. In a subgroup of patients who had follow-up CTs ≥12-month intervals, the AA diameter appeared to remain stable in SEV group with an aortic expansion rate of 0 (-0.4 to 0.8) mm (P=0.102), while it slightly enlarged in BEV group with an aortic expansion rate of 0.4 (-0.4 to 0.6) mm/y (P=0.038). In addition, the AA diameter also slightly enlarged in patients with BAV [0.2 (0 to 1.0) mm/y, P=0.015], while it remained stable in patients with tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) [0 (-0.8 to 0.6) mm/y, P=0.640].ConclusionsIn patients with dilatated AA who underwent TAVR, the type of THVs did not affect the procedural device success. BAV appeared to be a risk factor for both device failure and higher aortic expansion rate in these patients.

Project description:IntroductionIn patients with ascending aortic (AA) aneurysms, prosthetic graft replacement yields benefit but risk for complications in the descending aorta persists. Longitudinal impact of AA grafts on native descending aortic physiology is poorly understood.MethodsTransthoracic echocardiograms (echo) in patients undergoing AA elective surgical grafting were analyzed: Descending aortic deformation indices included global circumferential strain (GCS), time to peak (TTP) strain, and fractional area change (FAC). Computed tomography (CT) was used to assess aortic wall thickness and calcification.Results46 patients undergoing AA grafting were studied; 65% had congenital or genetically-associated AA (30% bicuspid valve, 22% Marfan, 13% other): After grafting (6.4±7.5 months), native descending aortic distension increased, irrespective of whether assessed based on circumferential strain or area-based methods (both p<0.001). Increased distensibility paralleled altered kinetics, as evidenced by decreased time to peak strain (p = 0.01) and increased velocity (p = 0.002). Augmented distensibility and flow velocity occurred despite similar pre- and post-graft blood pressure and medications (all p = NS), and was independent of pre-surgical aortic regurgitation or change in left ventricular stroke volume (both p = NS). Magnitude of change in GCS and FAC was 5-10 fold greater among patients with congenital or genetically associated AA vs. degenerative AA (p<0.001), paralleling larger descending aortic size, greater wall thickness, and higher prevalence of calcific atherosclerotic plaque in the degenerative group (all p<0.05). In multivariate analysis, congenital/genetically associated AA etiology conferred a 4-fold increment in magnitude of augmented native descending aortic strain after proximal grafting (B = 4.19 [CI 1.6, 6.8]; p = 0.002) independent of age and descending aortic size.ConclusionsProsthetic graft replacement of the ascending aorta increases magnitude and rapidity of distal aortic distension. Graft effects are greatest with congenital or genetically associated AA, providing a potential mechanism for increased energy transmission to the native descending aorta and adverse post-surgical aortic remodeling.