Dataset Information

Survey of transfemoral amputee experience and priorities for the user-centered design of powered robotic transfemoral prostheses.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Transfemoral amputees experience a complex host of physical, psychological, and social challenges, compounded by the functional limitations of current transfemoral prostheses. However, the specific relationships between human factors and prosthesis design and performance characteristics have not yet been adequately investigated. The present study aims to address this knowledge gap.

Methods

A comprehensive single-cohort survey of 114 unilateral transfemoral amputees addressed a broad range of demographic and clinical characteristics, functional autonomy, satisfaction and attitudes towards their current prostheses, and design priorities for an ideal transfemoral prosthesis, including the possibility of active assistance from a robotic knee unit. The survey was custom-developed based on several standard questionnaires used to assess motor abilities and autonomy in activities of daily living, prosthesis satisfaction, and quality of life in lower-limb amputees. Survey data were analyzed to compare the experience (including autonomy and satisfaction) and design priorities of users of transfemoral prostheses with versus without microprocessor-controlled knee units (MPKs and NMPKs, respectively), with a subsequent analyses of cross-category correlation, principal component analysis (PCA), cost-sensitivity segmentation, and unsupervised K-means clustering applied within the most cost-sensitive participants, to identify functional groupings of users with respect to their design priorities.

Results

The cohort featured predominantly younger (< 50 years) traumatic male amputees with respect to the general transfemoral amputee population, with pronounced differences in age distribution and amputation etiology (traumatic vs. non-traumatic) between MPK and NMPK groups. These differences were further reflected in user experience, with MPK users reporting significantly greater overall functional autonomy, satisfaction, and sense of prosthesis ownership than those with NMPKs, in conjunction with a decreased incidence of instability and falls. Across all participants, the leading functional priorities for an ideal transfemoral prosthesis were overall stability, adaptability to variable walking velocity, and lifestyle-related functionality, while the highest-prioritized general characteristics were reliability, comfort, and weight, with highly variable prioritization of cost according to reimbursement status. PCA and user clustering analyses revealed the possibility for functionally relevant groupings of prosthesis features and users, based on their differential prioritization of these features-with implications towards prosthesis design tradeoffs.

Conclusions

This study's findings support the understanding that when appropriately prescribed according to patient characteristics and needs in the context of a proactive rehabilitation program, advanced transfemoral prostheses promote patient mobility, autonomy, and overall health. Survey data indicate overall stability, modularity, and versatility as key design priorities for the continued development of transfemoral prosthesis technology. Finally, observed associations between prosthesis type, user experience, and attitudes concerning prosthesis ownership suggest both that prosthesis characteristics influence device acceptance and functional outcomes, and that psychosocial factors should be specifically and proactively addressed during the rehabilitation process.

SUBMITTER: Fanciullacci C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8643009 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPowered prosthetic ankles provide battery-powered mechanical push-off, with the aim of reducing the metabolic demands of walking for people with transtibial amputations. The efficacy of powered ankles has been shown in active, high functioning individuals with transtibial amputation, but is less clear in other populations. Additionally, it is unclear how use of a powered prosthesis influences everyday physical activity and mobility.MethodsIndividuals with unilateral transtibial amputations participated in a randomized clinical trial comparing their prescribed, unpowered prosthesis and the BiOM powered prosthesis. Participants' metabolic costs and self-selected walking speeds were measured in the laboratory and daily step count, daily steps away from home, and walking speed were measured over two weeks of at-home prosthesis use. Participants also rated their perception of mobility and quality of life and provided free-form feedback. Dependent measures were compared between prostheses and the relationships between metabolic cost, perception of mobility, and characteristics of walking in daily life were explored using Pearson's correlations.ResultsTwelve people were randomly allocated to the powered prosthesis first (n = 7) or unpowered prosthesis first (n = 5) and ten completed the full study. There were no differences in metabolic costs (p = 0.585), daily step count (p = 0.995), walking speed in-lab (p = 0.145) and in daily life (p = 0.226), or perception of mobility between prostheses (p ≥ 0.058). Changes varied across participants, however. There were several medium-sized effects for device comparisons. With the powered prosthesis, participants had increased self-reported ambulation (g = 0.682) and decreased frustration (g = 0.506).ConclusionsThere were no universal benefits of the powered prosthesis on function in the lab or home environment. However, the effects were subject-specific, with some reporting preference for power and improved mobility, and some increasing their activity and decreasing their metabolic effort. Additionally, self-reported preferences did not often correlate with objective measures of function. This highlights the need for future clinical research to include both perception and objective measures to better inform prosthetic prescription.Trial registrationhttps://clinicaltrials.gov , #NCT02828982. Registered 12 July 2016, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02828982.

Project description:BackgroundEnergy cost minimization has been widely accepted to regulate gait. Optimization principles have been frequently used to explain how individuals adapt their gait pattern. However, there have been rare attempts to account for the role of variability in this optimization process. Motor redundancy can enable individuals to perform tasks reliably while achieving energy optimization. However, we do not know how the non-goal-equivalent and goal-equivalent variability is regulated. In this study, we investigated how unilateral transfemoral amputees regulate step and stride variability based on the task to achieve energy economy.MethodsNine individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation walked on a treadmill at speeds of 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2 and 1.4 m/s using their prescribed passive prostheses. We calculated the step-to-step and stride-to-stride variability and applied goal equivalent manifold (GEM) based control to decompose goal-equivalent and non-goal-equivalent manifold. To quantify the energy economy, the energy recovery rate (R) was calculated based on potential energy and kinetic energy. Comparisons were made between GEM variabilities and commonly used standard deviation measurements. A linear regression model was used to investigate the trade-off between R and GEM variabilities.ResultsOur analysis shows greater variability along the goal-equivalent manifold compared to the non-goal-equivalent manifold (p < 0.001). Moreover, our analysis shows lower energy recovery rate for amputee gait compared to nonamputee gait (at least 20% less at faster walking speed). We found a negative relationship between energy recovery rate and non-goal-equivalent variability. Compared to the standard deviation measurements, the variability decomposed using GEM reflected the preferred walking speed and the limitation of the passive prosthetic device.ConclusionIndividuals with amputation cleverly leverage task redundancy, regulating step and stride variability to the GEM. This result suggests that task redundancy enables unilateral amputees to benefit from motor variability in terms of energy economy. The differences observed between prosthetic step and intact step support the development of prosthetic limbs capable of enhancing positive work during the double support phase and of powered prosthesis controllers that allow for variability along the task space while minimizing variability that interferes with the task goal. This study provides a different perspective on amputee gait analysis and challenges the field to think differently about the role of variability.