Dataset Information

Facial Feminization Surgery under Insurance: The University of California Los Angeles Experience.

ABSTRACT: Despite improved insurance coverage for gender confirmation surgeries in the United States, coverage for facial feminization surgery (FFS) continues to be difficult. Here, we describe our institutional experience on navigation, time, and costs of the FFS insurance authorization process.

Methods

FFS consults (n = 40) at the University of California, Los Angeles (2018-2020) were reviewed for time and cost to definitive insurance authorization decision. Patients were stratified into 3 groups based on authorization process: Group A (standard approval, n = 26, 65.0%) including public and private insurances; Group B (extended approval, n = 10, 25.0%) consisting of private insurance plans that initially denied and required multi-level appeals for denial overturn; and Group C (denial, n = 4, 10.0%), including private insurance plans that denied even after multi-level appeals.

Results

An estimated 90% of all patient consults were approved for FFS under insurance. Group A averaged 1.1 months for approval, requiring 1.4 hours of administrative time translating to $38.18 per patient. The addition of multi-level appeals in Groups B and C increased the total time for a definitive decision (7.0 and 5.1 months, respectively) and required both surgeon and administrative time to navigate the process (10.8 and 12.0 hours, respectively). The time spent on the presurgical authorization process for Groups B and C translated to an over 20-fold increase in cost ($855.00 and $988.38, respectively) compared with Group A.

Conclusion

Navigation of the insurance process for FFS is challenging and time-consuming; however, coverage is a reality in California provided that multi-level appeals are exhausted.

SUBMITTER: Hu AC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8647877 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundIn the context of demographic aging, active aging must be encouraged. In addition, the increase in life expectancy requires specific care for the elderly. Therefore, it is important to ensure appropriate training and education to caregivers. Educational institutions put value in positively influencing the attitudes and behaviours towards elderly people in order to ensure the quality of patient care in the future. Questionnaires are often used to assess attitudes. Among them, the University of California, Los Angeles Geriatrics Attitudes Scale (UCLA-GAS) was developed to assess attitudes towards older people and caring for older patients. This scale has been used to evaluate attitude of healthcare professionals and students including undergraduate physiotherapy students. To our knowledge, there is no scale that assesses the same concept in French. Therefore, this study aimed to translate and adapt the UCLA-GAS into French and to test its psychometric properties.MethodsWe conducted this study in two phases. First, we translated and adapted the UCLA-GAS from English into French following the five recommended stages of cross-cultural adaptation. Second, we validated the French version of the scale with undergraduate physiotherapy students. One hundred nineteen students participated from the first to the third academic years. We estimated reliability and validity of the scale. We performed correlation analyses between the French version of the UCLA-GAS (UCLA-GAS-F) with the Aging Stereotypes and Exercise Scale (ASES) and the Attitudes to Aging Questionnaire (AAQ).ResultsThe scale was translated and adapted into French. Results of the validation phase showed that the UCLA-GAS-F had high test-retest reliability (ICC 0.83, 95%CI 0.74-0.89), but internal consistency below 0.7 (Cronbach's alpha 0.49 to 0.57). The scale showed no ceiling or floor effect. As expected, the French version showed a weak correlation to the ASES (r = 0.28, p = .003) and to the AAQ (r = 0.32, p = .001).ConclusionsDespite low internal consistency, the French version of the UCLA-GAS showed appropriate psychometric properties. Further validation should include healthcare professionals and other healthcare students.