Dataset Information

Perspectives, Expectations, and Concerns of European Patient Advocates on Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products.

ABSTRACT: This paper presents the results of a qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews of 10 expert patient advocates on several different issues around Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs). The interviews were conducted between February and May 2020 based on a guideline with a list of 8 topics that covered concerns about safety and ethics, access problems and limitations, pricing of ATMPs and educational needs for patient communities. Overall, the interviewees expressed a high degree of convergence of opinions on most of the topics and especially on the identification of the reasons for concern. Conversely, when asked about possible solutions, quite a wide range of solutions were proposed, although with many common points. However, it highlights that the debate is still in its infancy and that there are not yet consolidated positions across the whole community. A general concern emerging from all the interviews is the potential limitation of access to approved ATMPs, both due to the high prices and to the geographical concentration of treatment centers. However, patients recognize the value of a model with a limited number of specialized clinical centers administering these therapies. On the ethical side, patients do not show particular concern as long as ATMPs and the underlying technology is used to treat severe diseases. Finally, patients are asking for both more education on ATMPs as well as for a more continuous involvement of patient representatives in the whole "life-cycle" of a new ATMP, from the development phase to the authorization, from the definition of the reimbursement scheme to the collection of Real Word Data on safety and long-term efficacy of the treatment.

SUBMITTER: Benvenuti S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8649896 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundFunding of orphan medicinal products (OMPs) is an increasing challenge in the European Union (EU).ObjectivesTo identify the different methods for public funding of OMPs in order to map the availability for rare disease patients, as well as to compare the public expenditures on OMPs in 8 EU member states.MethodsInformation on the reimbursement status of 83 OMPs was collected in 8 countries by distinguishing standard and special reimbursements. In two consecutive years, the total public expenditures on OMPs were calculated by using annual EUR exchange rates. Annual total public expenditures were calculated per capita, and as a proportion of GDP, total public pharmaceutical and healthcare budgets. Differences between countries were compared by calculating the deviations from the average spending of countries.ResultsIn 2015 29.4-92.8% of the 83 OMPs were available with any kind of public reimbursement in participant countries including special reimbursement on an individual basis. In Austria, Belgium and France more OMPs were accessible for patients with public reimbursement than in Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland. Standard reimbursement through retail pharmacies and/or hospitals was applied from 0 to 41% of OMPs. The average annual total public expenditure ranged between 1.4-23.5 €/capita in 2013 and 2014. Higher income countries spent more OMPs in absolute terms. Participant countries spent 0.018-0.066% of their GDPs on funding OMPs. Average expenditures on OMPs were ranged between 2.25-6.51% of the public pharmaceutical budget, and 0.44-0.96% of public healthcare expenditures.ConclusionsStandard and special reimbursement techniques play different roles in participant countries. The number of accessible OMPs indicated an equity gap between Eastern and Western Europe. The spending on OMPs as a proportion of GDP, public pharmaceutical and healthcare expenditure was not higher in lower income countries, which indicates substantial differences in patient access to OMPs in favour of higher-income countries. Equity in access for patients with rare diseases is an important policy objective in each member state of the EU; however, equity in access should be harmonized at the European level.

Project description:Phenylketonuria (PKU) is a rare genetic condition caused by inborn error(s) in the gene for the enzyme phenylalanine hydroxylase. Resulting loss of phenylalanine (Phe) metabolism requires strict dietary therapy and/or medication to prevent toxic accumulation of Phe. Novel investigational therapies, including gene therapies that aim to address underlying causes of PKU, are now entering clinical trials. However, perceptions of this technology in the PKU community have not been assessed. We conducted a qualitative survey recruiting adult patients, caregivers, and patient advocates from the US and 3 EU countries to assess the impact of living with PKU and the perceptions of gene therapy. Telephone interviews were conducted for up to 60 min following a standardized discussion guide. Interviewers classified each participant by their level of knowledge regarding gene therapy as either: low (little or no prior awareness); moderate (awareness of gene therapy as a concept in PKU); or high (working knowledge of gene therapy, e.g., vectors). In total, 33 participants were recruited (patients, n = 24; caregivers, n = 5; advocates, n = 4). The patient sample was well balanced among age groups, sex, and US/EU geographies. The participants' experiences and burden of living with PKU were largely negative, characterized by frustrations with current management consistent with prior reports. Most participants (n = 18/33) were identified as displaying moderate gene-therapy knowledge, 10/33 as displaying high knowledge, and 5/33 as displaying low knowledge. Both positive and negative perceptions were observed; positive perceptions were often linked to "hope" that gene therapy may represent a cure, whereas negative perceptions were linked to the "uncertainty" of outcomes. High knowledge of gene therapy appeared to trend with negative perceptions; 7/10 participants from this group reported high levels of concern over gene therapy. In contrast, participants who displayed low knowledge reported low (n = 3/5) or moderate (n = 2/5) concern, with predominantly positive perceptions. These data highlight the need for education around the theoretical risk:benefit profile of gene therapy. Despite current unknowns around gene therapy, our study demonstrates the important role of healthcare providers as educators who can use available data to provide balanced information to patients and caregivers.

Dataset Information

Perspectives, Expectations, and Concerns of European Patient Advocates on Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets