Dataset Information

Improving sleep quality leads to better mental health: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

ABSTRACT: The extent to which sleep is causally related to mental health is unclear. One way to test the causal link is to evaluate the extent to which interventions that improve sleep quality also improve mental health. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials that reported the effects of an intervention that improved sleep on composite mental health, as well as on seven specific mental health difficulties. 65 trials comprising 72 interventions and N = 8608 participants were included. Improving sleep led to a significant medium-sized effect on composite mental health (g+ = -0.53), depression (g+ = -0.63), anxiety (g+ = -0.51), and rumination (g+ = -0.49), as well as significant small-to-medium sized effects on stress (g+ = -0.42), and finally small significant effects on positive psychosis symptoms (g+ = -0.26). We also found a dose response relationship, in that greater improvements in sleep quality led to greater improvements in mental health. Our findings suggest that sleep is causally related to the experience of mental health difficulties. Future research might consider how interventions that improve sleep could be incorporated into mental health services, as well as the mechanisms of action that explain how sleep exerts an effect on mental health.

SUBMITTER: Scott AJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8651630 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Improving sleep quality leads to better mental health: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Scott Alexander J AJ Webb Thomas L TL Martyn-St James Marrissa M Rowse Georgina G Weich Scott S

Sleep medicine reviews 20210923

The extent to which sleep is causally related to mental health is unclear. One way to test the causal link is to evaluate the extent to which interventions that improve sleep quality also improve mental health. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials that reported the effects of an intervention that improved sleep on composite mental health, as well as on seven specific mental health difficulties. 65 trials comprising 72 interventions and N = 8608 participants were included. ...[more]

PMID: 34607184

Similar Datasets

Project description:Autistic people are more likely to have co-occurring mental health conditions compared to the general population, and mental health interventions have been identified as a top research priority by autistic people and the wider autism community. Autistic adults have also communicated that quality of life is the outcome that matters most to them in relation to mental health research and that they want to be involved more actively in the research process. Our systematic review aimed to determine the extent and nature of (1) quality of life measurement in randomised controlled trials of mental health interventions for autistic adults and (2) community involvement taking place within identified randomised controlled trials. We searched Medline, Embase, APA PsycInfo, Web of Science and grey literature sources. After screening over 10,000 records, 19 studies were eligible and five of those studies measured quality of life as an outcome. Of those five, three included community involvement and two did not report on community involvement. We conclude there is a need for increased use of quality of life measurement when trialling mental health interventions, including the use of measures validated for autistic adults - which would be facilitated by greater autistic involvement in the research process.Lay AbstractAutistic people are more likely to have health problems than the general population. They, and people who care about them, have said mental health research is very important, and some autistic adults have said quality of life is the most helpful area to research when focusing on mental health. Autistic people should also be more deeply involved in making decisions in research. Our review aimed to find out if and how quality of life is being measured when mental health treatments are being tested, and how autistic people and the wider autism community are involved in these studies. We searched four databases and other sources and found over 10,000 records. But just 19 research studies were testing mental health treatments for autistic adults, and only five of those measured quality of life. When they did measure quality of life, it was measured in different ways and there was not much information given on how communities were involved. We suggest mental health research should measure quality of life more often and in ways that are more helpful for autistic people. Our analysis found that mental health research needs to include a wider variety of autistic people, and autistic people should be more involved in the various parts of research.

Project description:IntroductionSleep disturbance is one of the common complaints of patients with COVID-19 infection. Melatonin is a physiological indoleamine involved in circadian rhythm regulation and it is currently used for secondary sleep disorders caused by various diseases. Some clinical randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have obtained a small amount of evidence and controversial results in support of their therapeutic effect on sleep disorders, but no studies have summarised and evaluated RCTs in all current databases to obtain conclusive results. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy and safety of melatonin in the treatment of sleep disturbances in patients with COVID-19.Methods and analysisWe will search for RCT-type studies of melatonin in the treatment of sleep disturbances in patients with COVID-19. From inception to October 2022 will be available on PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, LILACS, SCOPUS, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ICTRP, Wanfang Data, VIP database and CNKI, VIP database, China Biomedical Literature Database to search for eligible studies. There are no language and geographical restrictions. Two authors will independently screen and select eligible studies, assess methodological quality and perform data extraction. Two additional authors will independently extract data from each study. Then, meta-analysis will then be carried out using a fixed-effects or random-effects model, using the mean difference for continuous outcomes and the relative risk for dichotomous outcomes. Risk of bias assessment will be assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed by Cochrane Q-test and I2. The quality of evidence for each outcome will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. Funnel plots, Begg's test and Egger's test will be used to assess the risk of publication bias. Subgroup analysis, data synthesis, meta-analysis and overall incidence of adverse events will be performed using Review Manager V.5.4 software and Stata software. Trial sequential analysis will be performed if appropriate.Ethics and disseminationThis study is an extraction review of data from existing studies, and thus it is unnecessary to obtain ethical approval. The results of this systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.Prospero registration numberCRD42022359221.

Dataset Information

Improving sleep quality leads to better mental health: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Publications

Improving sleep quality leads to better mental health: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets