Dataset Information

Comparison between TAPP & Lichtenstein techniques for inguinal hernia repair: A retrospective cohort study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Worldwide, inguinal hernia repair is one of the commonest surgeries. The best treatment option to primary hernia has been investigated, but there still remains lack of evidence about the ideal approach. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the outcomes of inguinal hernia repair using transabdominal preperitoneal procedure (TAPP) & Lichtenstein techniques.

Materials and methods

This was a retrospective cohort study, conducted at Department of General & Minimal Invasive Surgery, SKIMS Medical College, Bemina, Srinagar. For performing the analysis, we used SPSS. Continuous variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation, and the categorical ones were presented as frequencies and percentages.

Results

A total of 60 patients were included (30 in each group). The mean age of the patients in both groups was around 54 years, and all patients were males. In unilateral cases the operating time was greater in the TAPP group than the Lichtenstein group (p < 0.001); however, in the bilateral cases, the operating time was significantly greater in the Lichtenstein than the TAPP group (p = 0.003). The pain scores, in unilateral cases, were significantly lower in the TAPP group than the Lichtenstein group (p < 0.001). The overall complication rate in the TAPP group was 6.7% while in the Lichtenstein group it was at 23.3%. In unilateral and bilateral cases, the patients significantly returned to work earlier in the TAPP group than those in the Lichtenstein group (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

TAPP and Lichtenstein techniques are both safe and reliable techniques for inguinal hernia repair. However, TAPP repair showed lesser post-operative pain, earlier discharge from the hospital, earlier return to usual activities, better cosmetic outcomes, and less persisting pain. However, there was no significant difference in the complication rate and TAPP repair was more costly for the patient.

SUBMITTER: Sofi J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8654788 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Introduction Inguinal hernia (IH) repair is among the most frequently performed surgical operations in children. While open herniorrhaphy has been the gold standard surgical method of choice, the popularity of laparoscopic repair has sharply risen over the past two decades. Although a wide range of literature on the use of laparoscopy for IH repair in children exists, data regarding neonates, an especially delicate group of children, is limited to only a few studies. This study aims to evaluate the surgical, anaesthetic, and follow-up data of term neonates undergoing percutaneous internal ring suturing (PIRS) for IH repair in order to determine if it is a viable option for this specific patient population. Materials and methods This single-centre retrospective cohort included all children who underwent PIRS for IH repair during an 86-month period between October 2015 and December 2022. Patients' gender, gestational age at birth, age and weight at surgery, side of IH at diagnosis, per-operative findings (presence of contralateral patent processus vaginalis (CPPV)), surgical time, time under anaesthesia, follow-up time, and follow-up findings were collected from an electronic database and analysed. The primary outcome measures were surgical time, rate of recurrence, and presence of CPPV and the secondary outcome measures were anaesthesia time and the rate of complications. Results During the study period, 34 neonates (23 male and 11 female) underwent laparoscopic repair for IH using the PIRS technique. Average age and weight at surgery were 25.2 ± 3.2 (20-30) days and 3530.4 ± 293.6 (3012 - 3952) gm, respectively. IH was detected on the right side in 19 (55.9%), on the left side in 12 (35.3%), and bilaterally in three (8.8%) patients at their presenting physical examination. Nine patients (26.5%) were found to have CPPV perioperatively, which were all repaired simultaneously. The average surgical time was 20.3 ± 4.5 minutes for unilateral and 25.8 ± 4.0 minutes for bilateral IH repair (p<0.01). On the contrary, the average time under anaesthesia was 33.2 ± 4.5 minutes for unilateral and 33.5 ± 4.9 minutes for bilateral IH repair, but the difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05). No early postoperative complications were observed. The average follow-up time was 27.6 ± 14.4 (range: 3-49) months. Recurrence was seen in one patient (2.9%) and umbilical incision granuloma was observed in two (5.9%) patients. Conclusion Surgical times, anaesthesia times, complication rates, recurrence rates, and rate of CPPV in neonates undergoing PIRS are similar to those in older children and comparable to those of open herniorrhaphy and other laparoscopic techniques. Despite the suspicion that the rate of CPPV would be higher in neonates, we found that it is similar to that in older children. We conclude that PIRS is a viable option for the minimally invasive repair of IH in neonates.

Project description:BackgroundTypically, in-person follow-up in clinic is utilized after outpatient inguinal hernia repair. Studies have shown that phone follow-up may be successfully used for the detection of postoperative hernia recurrences. However, no studies have evaluated the detection rates of other postoperative complications, such as emergency department visits and readmissions, with the utilization of phone follow-up after inguinal hernia repair. The objective of our study was to investigate the safety of a phone follow-up care pathway following elective, outpatient inguinal hernia repair.MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, adult patients who underwent elective, outpatient inguinal hernia repair between 2013 and 2019 at a large academic health system in the Midwest United States were identified from the electronic health record. Patients were categorized by type of postoperative follow-up: in-person or phone follow-up. Baseline demographics, operative, and postoperative data were compared between follow-up groups. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to investigate predictors of having any related emergency department (ED) visit/readmission/reoperation within 90 days.ResultsWe included 2009 patients who underwent elective inguinal hernia repair during the study period. 321 patients had in-person follow-up only, while 1,688 patients had phone follow-up. There was a higher rate of laparoscopic repair in the phone follow-up group (85.4% vs. 53.0% for in-person follow-up). There were no differences in rates of related 90-day ED visits, readmissions, and reoperations between the phone and in-person follow-up groups. On multivariable logistic regression, receipt of phone follow-up was not a predictor of having 90-day ED visits, readmissions, or reoperations (OR 1.30, 95% CI [0.83, 2.05]).ConclusionsPatients who underwent phone follow-up had similarly low rates of adverse outcomes to those with in-person follow-up. Phone follow-up protocols may be implemented as an alternative for patients and provide a means to decrease healthcare utilization following inguinal hernia repair.