Dataset Information

Identification of an m6A Regulators-Mediated Prognosis Signature For Survival Prediction and Its Relevance to Immune Infiltration in Melanoma.

ABSTRACT: Despite robust evidence for the role of m6A in cancer development and progression, its association with immune infiltration and survival outcomes in melanoma remains obscure. Here, we aimed to develop an m6A-related risk signature to improve prognostic and immunotherapy responder prediction performance in the context of melanoma. We comprehensively analyzed the m6A cluster and immune infiltration phenotypes of public datasets. The TCGA (n = 457) and eleven independent melanoma cohorts (n = 758) were used as the training and validation datasets, respectively. We identified two m6A clusters (m6A-clusterA and m6A-clusterB) based on the expression pattern of m6A regulators via unsupervised consensus clustering. IGF2BP1 (7.49%), KIAA1429 (7.06%), and YTHDC1 (4.28%) were the three most frequently mutated genes. There was a correlation between driver genes mutation statuses and the expression of m6A regulators. A significant difference in tumor-associated immune infiltration between two m6A clusters was detected. Compared with m6A-clusterA, the m6A-clusterB was characterized by a lower immune score and immune cell infiltration but higher mRNA expression-based stemness index (mRNAsi). An m6A-related risk signature consisting of 12 genes was determined via Cox regression analysis and divided the patients into low- and high-risk groups (IL6ST, MBNL1, NXT2, EIF2A, CSGALNACT1, C11orf58, CD14, SPI1, NCCRP1, BOK, CD74, PAEP). A nomogram was developed for the prediction of the survival rate. Compared with the high-risk group, the low-risk group was characterized by high expression of immune checkpoints and immunophenoscore (IPS), activation of immune-related pathways, and more enriched in immune cell infiltrations. The low-risk group had a favorable prognosis and contained the potential beneficiaries of the immune checkpoint blockade therapy and verified by the IMvigor210 cohort (n = 298). The m6A-related signature we have determined in melanoma highlights the relationships between m6A regulators and immune cell infiltration. The established risk signature was identified as a promising clinical biomarker of melanoma.

SUBMITTER: Wu L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8656227 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: As a recurrent inflammatory bone disease, the treatment of osteomyelitis is always a tricky problem in orthopaedics. N6-methyladenosine (m6A) regulators play significant roles in immune and inflammatory responses. Nevertheless, the function of m6A modification in osteomyelitis remains unclear. Methods: Based on the key m6A regulators selected by the GSE16129 dataset, a nomogram model was established to predict the incidence of osteomyelitis by using the random forest (RF) method. Through unsupervised clustering, osteomyelitis patients were divided into two m6A subtypes, and the immune infiltration of these subtypes was further evaluated. Validating the accuracy of the diagnostic model for osteomyelitis and the consistency of clustering based on the GSE30119 dataset. Results: 3 writers of Methyltransferase-like 3 (METTL3), RNA-binding motif protein 15B (RBM15B) and Casitas B-lineage proto-oncogene like 1 (CBLL1) and three readers of YT521-B homology domain-containing protein 1 (YTHDC1), YT521-B homology domain-containing family 3 (YTHDF2) and Leucine-rich PPR motif-containing protein (LRPPRC) were identified by difference analysis, and their Mean Decrease Gini (MDG) scores were all greater than 10. Based on these 6 significant m6A regulators, a nomogram model was developed to predict the incidence of osteomyelitis, and the fitting curve indicated a high degree of fit in both the test and validation groups. Two m6A subtypes (cluster A and cluster B) were identified by the unsupervised clustering method, and there were significant differences in m6A scores and the abundance of immune infiltration between the two m6A subtypes. Among them, two m6A regulators (METTL3 and LRPPRC) were closely related to immune infiltration in patients with osteomyelitis. Conclusion: m6A regulators play key roles in the molecular subtypes and immune response of osteomyelitis, which may provide assistance for personalized immunotherapy in patients with osteomyelitis.

Project description:BackgroundMelanoma is the most dangerous form of skin cancer because of its high metastatic potential. Potential-N6-methyladenosine (m6A)-related long noncoding RNAs (pMRlncRNAs) play a vital role in malignancy. The identification of prognostic-related pMRlncRNAs and development of risk signatures could improve the prognosis and promote the precise treatment of melanoma.MethodsGene expression and relevant clinical data were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. Prognostic-related pMRlncRNAs were selected using univariate Cox regression analysis. Patients with melanoma were classified into different subtypes using the "ConsensusClusterPlus" package, and the ESTIMATE algorithm was applied to depict their immune landscape. A pMRlncRNA risk signature was developed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analysis and verified using survival analysis and receiver operating characteristic curves. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was used to investigate the underlying biological pathways. The relationships between risk score and clinicopathological characteristics, as well as programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level, were investigated. A nomogram with calibration curves was established to comprehensively predict the outcome of melanoma.ResultsFifteen pMRlncRNAs were significantly associated with overall survival (OS). Two cluster subtypes were identified by consensus clustering. Patients in cluster 2 were associated with better OS, higher PD-L1 expression level, lower T stage, and higher ESTIMATEScore, ImmuneScore, and StromalScore than those in cluster 1. There were differences in immune cell infiltration between the 2 clusters. Ten pMRlncRNAs with prognostic value were selected to develop a risk signature, that functioned as an independent prognostic factor for melanoma. Patients with low-risk scores had a better prognosis in general. The area under the curve (AUC) value (0.720), as well as 1-, 3-, and 5-year calibration curves, revealed that the risk signature has suitable predictive power for prognosis. GSEA revealed 10 pathways that might play important roles in melanoma. Moreover, patients with high-risk scores were associated with advanced T stage, cluster 1, lower ImmuneScore, and higher PD-L1 expression level.ConclusionsWe developed a novel 10-pMRlncRNA risk signature that could elucidate the crucial role of pMRlncRNAs in the immune landscape of melanoma and predict prognosis.

Project description:BackgroundDNA damage repair plays an important role in the onset and progression of cancers and its resistance to treatment therapy. This study aims to assess the prognostic potential of DNA damage repair markers in skin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM).MethodIn this study, we have analyzed the gene expression profiles being downloaded from TCGA, GTEx, and GEO databases. We sequentially used univariate and LASSO Cox regression analyses to screen DNA repair genes associated with prognosis. Then, we have conducted a multivariate regression analysis to construct the prognostic profile of DNA repair-related genes (DRRGs). The risk coefficient is used to calculate the risk scores and divide the patients into two cohorts. Additionally, we validated our prognosis model on an external cohort as well as evaluated the link between immune response and the DRRGs prognostic profiles. The risk signature is compared to immune cell infiltration, chemotherapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment.ResultsAn analysis using LASSO-Cox stepwise regression established a prognostic signature consisting of twelve DRRGs with strong predictive ability. Disease-specific survival (DSS) is found to be lower among high-risk patients group as compared to low-risk patients. The signature may be employed as an independent prognostic predictor after controlling for clinicopathological factors, as demonstrated by validation on one external GSE65904 cohort. A strong correlation is also found between the risk score and the immune microenvironment, along with the infiltrating immune cells, and ICIs key molecules. The gene enrichment analysis results indicate a wide range of biological activities and pathways to be exhibited by high-risk groups. Furthermore, Cisplatin exhibited a considerable response sensitivity in low-risk groups as opposed to the high-risk incidents, while docetaxel exhibited a considerable response sensitivity in high-risk groups.ConclusionsOur findings provide a thorough investigation of DRRGs to develop an DSS-related prognostic indicator which may be useful in forecasting SKCM progression and enabling more enhanced clinical benefits from immunotherapy.

Dataset Information

Identification of an m6A Regulators-Mediated Prognosis Signature For Survival Prediction and Its Relevance to Immune Infiltration in Melanoma.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets