Dataset Information

Identifying prognostic signatures in the microenvironment of prostate cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Background

An increasing number of studies has indicated that the tumor microenvironment (TME), an important component of tumor tissue, has clinicopathological significance in predicting disease outcome and therapeutic efficacy. However, little evidence in prostate cancer (PCa) is available.

Methods

The cohort of TCGA-PRAD (n=477) was used in this study. Based on the proportion of 22 types of immune cells calculated by CIBERSORT, the TME was classified by K-means clustering and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were determined. The TMEscore was calculated based on cluster signature genes, which were obtained from DEGs by the random forest method, and the samples were classified into two subtypes. Analyses of somatic mutation and copy number variation (CNVs) were further conducted to identify the genetic characteristics of the two subtypes. Correlation analysis was performed to explore the correlation between TMEscore and the tumor response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as well as the prognosis of PCa.

Results

Based on the distribution of infiltrating immune cells in the TME, we constructed the TMEscore model and classified PCa samples into high and low TMEscore groups. Survival analysis indicated that the high TMEscore group had significantly better survival outcome than the low TMEscore group. Correlation analysis showed a significantly positive correlation between TMEscore and the known prognostic factors of PCa.

Conclusions

Our study indicates that the TMEscore could be a potential prognostic biomarker in PCa. A comprehensive description of the characteristics of TME may help predict the response to therapies and provide new treatment strategies for PCa patients.

SUBMITTER: Lu G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8661256 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundProstate cancer, the second most prevalent malignancy among men, poses a significant threat to affected patients' well-being due to its poor prognosis. Novel biomarkers are required to enhance clinical outcomes and tailor personalized treatments. Herein, we describe our research to explore the prognostic value of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) deregulated by copy number variations (CNVs) in prostate cancer.MethodsThe study employed an integrative multi-omics data analysis of the prostate cancer transcriptomic, CNV and methylation datasets to identify prognosis-related subtypes. Subtype-specific expression profiles of protein-coding genes (PCGs) and lncRNAs were determined. We analysed CNV patterns of lncRNAs across the genome to identify subtype-specific lncRNAs with CNV changes. LncRNAs exhibiting significant amplification or deletion and a positive correlation were designated CNV-deregulated lncRNAs. A prognostic risk score model was subsequently developed using these CNV-driven lncRNAs.ResultsSix molecular subtypes of prostate cancer were identified, demonstrating significant differences in prognosis (P = 0.034). The CNV profiles of subtype-specific lncRNAs were examined, revealing their correlation with CNV amplification or deletion. Six lncRNAs (CCAT2, LINC01593, LINC00276, GACAT2, LINC00457, LINC01343) were selected based on significant CNV amplifications or deletions using a rigorous univariate Cox proportional risk regression model. A robust risk score model was developed, stratifying patients into high-risk and low-risk categories. Notably, our prognostic model based on these six lncRNAs exhibited exceptional predictive capabilities for recurrence-free survival (RFS) in prostate cancer patients (P = 0.024).ConclusionsOur study successfully identified a prognostic risk score model comprising six CNV-driven lncRNAs that could potentially be prognostic biomarkers for prostate cancer. These lncRNA signatures are closely associated with RFS, providing promising prospects for improved patient prognostication and personalized therapeutic strategies for novel prostate cancer treatment.

Project description:Breast cancer is one of the most common female malignancies worldwide. Due to its early metastases formation and a high degree of malignancy, the 10 year-survival rate of metastatic breast cancer does not exceed 30%. Thus, more precise biomarkers are urgently needed. In our study, we first estimated the tumor microenvironment (TME) infiltration using the xCell algorithm. Based on TME infiltration, the three main TME clusters were identified using consensus clustering. Our results showed that the three main TME clusters cause significant differences in survival rates and TME infiltration patterns (log-rank test, p = 0.006). Then, multiple machine learning algorithms were used to develop a nine-pathway-based TME-related risk model to predict the prognosis of breast cancer (BRCA) patients (the immune-related pathway-based risk score, defined as IPRS). Based on the IPRS, BRCA patients were divided into two subgroups, and patients in the IPRS-low group presented significantly better overall survival (OS) rates than the IPRS-high group (log-rank test, p < 0.0001). Correlation analysis revealed that the IPRS-low group was characterized by increases in immune-related scores (cytolytic activity (CYT), major histocompatibility complex (MHC), T cell-inflamed immune gene expression profile (GEP), ESTIMATE, immune, and stromal scores) while exhibiting decreases in tumor purity, suggesting IPRS-low patients may have a strong immune response. Additionally, the gene-set enrichment analysis (GSEA) result confirmed that the IPRS-low patients were significantly enriched in several immune-associated signaling pathways. Furthermore, multivariate Cox analysis revealed that the IPRS was an independent prognostic biomarker after adjustment by clinicopathologic characteristics. The prognostic value of the IPRS model was further validated in three external validation cohorts. Altogether, our findings demonstrated that the IPRS was a powerful predictor to screen out certain populations with better prognosis in breast cancer and may serve as a potential biomarker guiding clinical treatment decisions.