Dataset Information

Diffusion MRI fiber diameter for muscle denervation assessment.

ABSTRACT:

Background

To develop and evaluate a diffusion MRI-based apparent muscle fiber diameter (AFD) method in patients with muscle denervation. It was hypothesized that AFD differences between denervated, non-denervated and control muscles would be greater than those from standard diffusion metrics.

Methods

A spin-echo diffusion acquisition with multi-b-valued diffusion sampling was used. An orientation-invariant dictionary approach utilized a cylinder-based forward model and multi-compartment model for obtaining restricted and free fractions. Simulations were performed to determine precision, bias, and optimize dictionary parameters. In all, 18 exams of patients with muscle denervation and 8 exams of healthy subjects were performed at 3T. Six regions of interests (ROIs) within separate shoulder muscles were selected, yielding three groups consisting 47 control (healthy), 36 non-denervated (patients), and 68 denervated (patients) muscle ROIs. Two-sample t-tests (α=0.05) between groups were performed with Holm-Bonferroni correction. T₂- and fat fraction (FF)-mapping were acquired for comparison.

Results

Mean AFD was 89.7±13.6 µm in control, 71.6±15.3 µm in non-denervated, and 60.7±15.9 µm in denervated muscles and were significantly different (P<0.001) in paired comparisons and in 10/12 individual muscle region comparisons. Correlation between AFD and FF (-0.331, P<0.001) was low, but correlation between FA and FF was negligible (0.197, P=0.016). Correlation was low between AFD and T₂ (-0.395, P<0.001) and between FA and T₂ (0.359, P<0.001).

Conclusions

Diffusion MRI-based AFD complements T2- and FF-mapping techniques to non-invasively assess muscle denervation.

SUBMITTER: Tan ET

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8666740 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to develop a DTI-based method to quantitatively assess fiber angles and changes therein in leg muscles in order to facilitate longitudinal studies on muscle fiber architectural adaptations in healthy subjects.MethodsThe upper legs of five volunteers were scanned twice on the same day. The right lower legs of five volunteers were scanned twice with the ankle in three positions, i.e. -15° dorsiflexion, 0° neutral position, and 30° plantarflexion. The MRI protocols consisted of a noise scan, a 3-point mDixon scan and a DTI scan. Fiber-angle color maps were generated for four muscles in the upper legs and two muscles in the lower leg. Voxel-wise fiber angles (θ) were calculated from the angle between the principal eigenvector of the diffusion tensor and a reference line defined between the origo and insertion points of each muscle. Bland-Altman analysis, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (CV%), minimal detectable change (MDC), standard error (SE) and Friedman test were used for assessing the feasibility of this method and in order to have an indication of the repeatability and the sensitivity.ResultsBland-Altman analysis showed good repeatability (CV%<10 and 0.7≤ICC≤0.9) with exception of the Tibialis Anterior (TA) muscle in dorsiflexion position(CV%: 12.2) and the Semitendinosus (ST) muscle (left leg) (CV%: 11.4). The best repeatability metrics were found for the SOL muscle in neutral position (CV%: 2.6). Changes in average θ in TA and SOL with ankle positions were observed in accordance with expected agonist and antagonist functions of both muscles. For example, for the anterior left compartment the change in fiber angle Δθ with respect to the neutral position Δθ = -1.6° ± 0.8° and 2.2° ± 2.8° (p = 0.008), for dorsiflexion and plantarflexion, respectively.ConclusionOur method facilitates fast inspection and quantification of muscle fiber angles in the lower and upper leg muscles in rest and detection of changes in lower-leg muscle fiber angles with varying ankle angles.

Project description:Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) is widely used to probe tissue microstructure, and is currently the only non-invasive way to measure the brain's fiber architecture. While a large number of approaches to recover the intra-voxel fiber structure have been utilized in the scientific community, a direct, 3D, quantitative validation of these methods against relevant histological fiber geometries is lacking. In this study, we investigate how well different high angular resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI) models and reconstruction methods predict the ground-truth histologically defined fiber orientation distribution (FOD), as well as investigate their behavior over a range of physical and experimental conditions. The dMRI methods tested include constrained spherical deconvolution (CSD), Q-ball imaging (QBI), diffusion orientation transform (DOT), persistent angular structure (PAS), and neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) methods. Evaluation criteria focus on overall agreement in FOD shape, correct assessment of the number of fiber populations, and angular accuracy in orientation. In addition, we make comparisons of the histological orientation dispersion with the fiber spread determined from the dMRI methods. As a general result, no HARDI method outperformed others in all quality criteria, with many showing tradeoffs in reconstruction accuracy. All reconstruction techniques describe the overall continuous angular structure of the histological FOD quite well, with good to moderate correlation (median angular correlation coefficient > 0.70) in both single- and multiple-fiber voxels. However, no method is consistently successful at extracting discrete measures of the number and orientations of FOD peaks. The major inaccuracies of all techniques tend to be in extracting local maxima of the FOD, resulting in either false positive or false negative peaks. Median angular errors are ?10° for the primary fiber direction and ?20° for the secondary fiber, if present. For most methods, these results did not vary strongly over a wide range of acquisition parameters (number of diffusion weighting directions and b value). Regardless of acquisition parameters, all methods show improved successes at resolving multiple fiber compartments in a voxel when fiber populations cross at near-orthogonal angles, with no method adequately capturing low to moderate angle (<60°) crossing fibers. Finally, most methods are limited in their ability to capture orientation dispersion, resulting in low to moderate, yet statistically significant, correlation with histologically-derived dispersion with both HARDI and NODDI methodologies. Together, these results provide quantitative measures of the reliability and limitations of dMRI reconstruction methods and can be used to identify relative advantages of competing approaches as well as potential strategies for improving accuracy.