Dataset Information

Treatment and Survival Outcomes Associated With Platinum Plus Low-Dose, Long-term Fluorouracil for Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

ABSTRACT:

Importance

The treatment of metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC) is a major challenge because of drug resistance and the toxic effects of chemotherapy.

Objective

To evaluate the survival and toxicity outcomes and safety associated with the use of a modified low-dose fluorouracil protocol compared with standard regimens recommended in current guidelines for treatment of mNPC.

Design, setting, and participants

This retrospective cohort study was based on data retrieved from electronic medical records from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center in China for 1397 patients with mNPC diagnosed from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2017. Data analyses were conducted from October 1, 2020, to May 1, 2021.

Exposures

Patients received chemotherapy, including platinum plus low-dose, long-term fluorouracil (PFLL); cisplatin plus standard dose, short-term fluorouracil (PFSS); cisplatin plus gemcitabine (GP); cisplatin plus taxane (TP); and cisplatin plus taxane plus fluorouracil (TPF).

Main outcomes and measures

The main outcomes included overall survival (OS); subsequent-line, treatment-free survival (sTFS), defined as the period from metastasis to the date requiring subsequent-line treatment or death; and the survival to toxicity ratio (STR), defined as person-year rate of OS divided by person-year rate of severe hematologic toxic effects. Cox regression models were used to compare the outcomes of patients receiving PFLL vs other regimens, adjusting for baseline characteristics.

Results

Of 1397 patients with mNPC included in this study (1152 men; median age, 46 years [range, 18-70 years]) 134 received PFLL, 203 received GP, 330 received PFSS, 366 received TP, and 364 received TPF. A total of 764 patients died (75 in treatment group PFLL; 107 in group GP; 204 in group PFSS; 207 in group TP; and 171 in group TPF), and 979 patients had subsequent-line treatment or died, whichever occurred first (PFLL, 77; GP, 144; PFSS, 262; TP, 269; and TPF, 227). The median follow-up was 46.9 months (IQR, 25.4-82.4 months), and the 5-year OS rate among patients who received PFLL was 25.4% (95% CI, 16.7%-38.8%), which was not significantly different from that among patients who did not receive PFLL (30.2%; 95% CI, 27.1%-33.5%; P = .13) or who received GP (25.1%; 95% CI, 18.1%-35.0%; P = .81), PFSS (23.6%; 95% CI, 18.5%-30.0%; P = .80), or TP (28.1%; 95% CI, 22.8%-34.7%; P = .99) but was lower than that for patients who received TPF (40.4%; 95% CI, 34.7%-47.1%; P = .001). The 5-year sTFS among patients who received PFLL (24.1%; 95% CI, 15.4%-37.6%) was significantly higher than that among patients who did not receive PFLL (18.5%; 95% CI, 16.1%-21.3%; P = .005) or who received GP (14.3%; 95% CI, 9.1%-22.5%; P = .001) but similar to that for patients who received TPF (28.0%; 95% CI, 23.0%-34.0%; P = .74). The STR of PFLL was 0.81, substantially better than that of GP (0.41) and TPF (0.65).

Conclusions and relevance

The results of this cohort study suggest that, compared with the use of standard treatment regimens, administration of PFLL was associated with similar OS but prolonged sTFS. PFLL also had better STR than other regimens, which could indicate less severe toxic effects. Thus, PFLL may be an option for first-line treatment of mNPC.

SUBMITTER: Zheng SH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8669524 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Standard-of-care first-line treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) is platinum-based chemotherapy (CTx). Maintenance immunotherapy is a treatment option for patients without progressive disease (PD) after induction CTx. IMvigor130 was a randomised, phase 3 study evaluating atezolizumab plus platinum-based CTx (arm A), atezolizumab monotherapy (arm B), or placebo plus platinum-based CTx (arm C) as first-line treatment for mUC. The primary progression-free survival (PFS) analysis showed a statistically significant PFS benefit favouring arm A versus arm C, which did not translate into overall survival (OS) benefit at the final OS analysis. We report exploratory analyses based on response to combination induction treatment (arm A vs arm C) using final OS data. Post-induction OS was analysed for patients without PD during induction (4-6 CTx cycles) who received at least one dose of single-agent atezolizumab/placebo maintenance treatment. Post-progression OS was analysed for patients with PD during induction CTx. Addition of atezolizumab to CTx did not impact OS outcomes, regardless of response to induction CTx, with hazard ratios of 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-1.10) for patients without PD and 0.75 (95% CI 0.54-1.05) for those with PD during induction CTx. Treatment effects appeared to be greatest for patients treated with cisplatin and for those with PD-L1-high tumours.Patient summaryThe IMvigor130 trial showed that addition of atezolizumab to chemotherapy (CTx) did not improve survival over CTx alone in patients with bladder cancer. Overall, patients whose cancer did not progress during initial treatment tended to live longer than patients whose cancer did progress, but addition of atezolizumab to CTx did not help either group live longer in comparison to CTx alone. However, the results suggest that patients who received a certain CTx drug (cisplatin) or who had high levels of a marker called PD-L1 in their tumour may get the most improvement from addition of atezolizumab to CTx.The IMvigor130 trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02807636.

Project description:IntroductionLiposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) has shown clinical benefit in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPAC) who progressed on gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. However, its role in patients with mPAC previously treated with conventional irinotecan-containing chemotherapy has not been appropriately investigated.MethodsIn this retrospective analysis, patients with mPAC who received nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV after conventional irinotecan-containing regimen between January 2017 and March 2020, were identified from two referral cancer centers in South Korea. The ratio of time to progression (TTP) with nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV to TTP with conventional irinotecan (TTPr) was analyzed with respect to the duration and cumulative dose of conventional irinotecan treatment.ResultsIn total, 35 patients treated with nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV after the irinotecan-containing regimen were analyzed. The median age was 58 years and 16 (46%) patients were male. The median duration of conventional irinotecan therapy was 4.6 months at a median cumulative dose of 1230 mg. The objective response rate of nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV was 2.9%, and stable disease was achieved in 11 (31.4%) patients. During the median follow-up of 9.2 [95% confidence interval (CI): 7.8-10.5] months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 2.0 (95% CI: 1.4-2.6) months and 4.4 (95% CI: 3.6-5.7) months, respectively. The 6-month PFS and OS rates were 16.3% and 37.5%, respectively. The median TTPr was 0.41 (range, 0.07-2.07), showing a negative correlation with the cumulative dose of prior irinotecan therapy (R = -0.37, p = 0.041). A tentative negative correlation between TTPr and duration of prior irinotecan therapy was observed (R = -0.35, p = 0.062). The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (20%) and fatigue (8.6%).ConclusionNal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV showed modest effectiveness and manageable toxicities for patients with mPAC previously treated with conventional irinotecan-containing chemotherapy. The cumulative dose of prior conventional irinotecan therapy may be inversely correlated with the effectiveness of nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV.