Dataset Information

Using electronic health data to explore effectiveness of ICU EEG and anti-seizure treatment.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to examine critical care continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) utilization and downstream anti-seizure treatment patterns, their association with outcomes, and generate hypotheses for larger comparative effectiveness studies of cEEG-guided interventions.

Methods

Single-center retrospective study of critically ill patients (n = 14,523, age ≥18 years). Exposure defined as ≥24 h of cEEG and subsequent anti-seizure medication (ASM) escalation, with or without concomitant anesthetic. Exposure window was the first 7 days of admission. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Multivariable analysis was performed using penalized logistic regression.

Results

One thousand and seventy-three patients underwent ≥24 h of cEEG within 7 days of admission. After adjusting for disease severity, ≥24 h of cEEG followed by ASM escalation in patients not on anesthetics (n = 239) was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (OR 0.76 [0.53-1.07]), though the finding did not reach significance. ASM escalation with concomitant anesthetic use (n = 484) showed higher odds for mortality (OR 1.41 [1.03-1.94]). In the seizures/status epilepticus subgroup, post cEEG ASM escalation without anesthetics showed lower odds for mortality (OR 0.43 [0.23-0.74]). Within the same subgroup, ASM escalation with concomitant anesthetic use showed higher odds for mortality (OR 1.34 [0.92-1.91]) though not significant.

Interpretation

Based on our findings we propose the following hypotheses for larger comparative effectiveness studies investigating the direct causal effect of cEEG-guided treatment on outcomes: (1) cEEG-guided ASM escalation may improve outcomes in critically ill patients with seizures; (2) cEEG-guided treatment with combination of ASMs and anesthetics may not improve outcomes in all critically ill patients.

SUBMITTER: Amerineni R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8670316 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Using electronic health data to explore effectiveness of ICU EEG and anti-seizure treatment.

Amerineni Rajesh R Sun Haoqi H Lee Hang H Hsu John J Patorno Elisabetta E Westover Michael Brandon MB Zafar Sahar F SF

Annals of clinical and translational neurology 20211121 12

<h4>Objectives</h4>The purpose of this study was to examine critical care continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) utilization and downstream anti-seizure treatment patterns, their association with outcomes, and generate hypotheses for larger comparative effectiveness studies of cEEG-guided interventions.<h4>Methods</h4>Single-center retrospective study of critically ill patients (n = 14,523, age ≥18 years). Exposure defined as ≥24 h of cEEG and subsequent anti-seizure medication (ASM) escalatio ...[more]

PMID: 34802196

Similar Datasets

Project description:The purpose of this pilot study was to analyze treatment pathways of pediatric epilepsy using the common data model (CDM) based on electronic health record (EHR) data. We also aimed to reveal whether CDM analysis was feasible and applicable to epilepsy research. We analyzed the treatment pathways of pediatric epilepsy patients from our institute who underwent antiseizure medication (ASM) treatment for at least 2 years, using the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP)-CDM. Subgroup analysis was performed for generalized or focal epilepsy, varying age of epilepsy onset, and specific epilepsy syndromes. Changes in annual prescription patterns were also analyzed to reveal the different trends. We also calculated the proportion of drug-resistant epilepsy by applying the definition of seizure persistence after application of two ASMs for a sufficient period of time (more than 6 months). We identified 1,192 patients who underwent treatment for more than 2 years (mean ± standard deviation: 6.5 ± 3.2 years). In our pediatric epilepsy cohort, we identified 313 different treatment pathways. Drug resistance, calculated as the application of more than three ASMs during the first 2 years of treatment, was 23.8%. Treatment pathways and ASM resistance differed between subgroups of generalized vs. focal epilepsy, different onset age of epilepsy, and specific epilepsy syndromes. The frequency of ASM prescription was similar between onset groups of different ages; however, phenobarbital was frequently used in children with epilepsy onset < 4 years. Ninety-one of 344 cases of generalized epilepsy and 187 of 835 cases of focal epilepsy were classified as medically intractable epilepsy. The percentage of drug resistance was markedly different depending on the specific electro-clinical epilepsy syndrome [79.0% for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), 7.1% for childhood absence epilepsy (CAE), and 9.0% for benign epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes (BECTS)]. We could visualize the annual trend and changes of ASM prescription for pediatric epilepsy in our institute from 2004 to 2017. We revealed that CDM analysis was feasible and applicable for epilepsy research. The strengths and limitations of CDM analysis should be carefully considered when planning the analysis, result extraction, and interpretation of results.

Project description:ObjectivePrevious studies suggested that patients with epilepsy might be able to fore-cast their own seizures. We sought to assess the relationships of premonitory symptoms and perceived seizure risk with future and recent self-reported and EEG-confirmed seizures in the subjects living with epilepsy in their natural home environments.MethodsWe collected long-term e-surveys from ambulatory patients with and without concurrent EEG recordings. Information obtained from the e-surveys included medication compliance, sleep quality, mood, stress, perceived seizure risk and seizure occurrences preceding the survey. EEG seizures were identified. Univariate and multivariate generalized linear mixed-effect regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for the assessment of the relationships. Results were compared with device seizure forecasting literature using a mathematical formula converting OR to equivalent area under the curve (AUC).ResultsSixty-nine subjects returned 12,590 e-survey entries, with four subjects acquiring concurrent EEG recordings. Univariate analysis revealed increased stress (OR = 2.52, 95% CI = [1.52, 4.14], p < 0.001) and decreased mood (0.32, [0.13, 0.82], 0.02) were associated with increased relative odds of future self-reported seizures. On multivariate analysis, previous self-reported seizures (4.24, [2.69, 6.68], < 0.001) were most strongly associated with future self-reported seizures, and high perceived seizure risk (3.30, [1.97, 5.52], < 0.001) remained significant when prior self-reported seizures were added to the model. No significant association was found between e-survey responses and subsequent EEG seizures.SignificanceIt appears that patients may tend to self-forecast seizures that occur in sequential groupings. Our results suggest that low mood and increased stress may be the result of previous seizures rather than independent premonitory symptoms. Patients in the small cohort with concurrent EEG showed no ability to self-predict EEG seizures. The conversion from OR to AUC values facilitates direct comparison of performance between survey and device studies involving survey premonition and forecasting.Key pointsLong-term e-surveys data and concurrent EEG signals were collected across three study sites to assess the ability of the patients to self-forecast their seizures.Patients may tend to self-forecast self-reported seizures that occur in sequential groupings.Factors, such as mood and stress, may not be independent premonitory symptoms but may be the consequence of recent seizures.No ability to self-forecast EEG confirmed seizures was observed in a small cohort with concurrent EEG validation.A mathematic relation between OR and AUC provides a means to compare forecasting performance between survey and device studies.

Project description:Background and objectiveEpilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders, whose development is typically detected via early seizures. Electroencephalogram (EEG) is prevalently employed for seizure identification due to its routine and low expense collection. The stochastic nature of EEG makes manual seizure inspections laborsome, motivating automated seizure identification. The relevant literature focuses mostly on supervised machine learning. Despite their success, supervised methods require expert labels indicating seizure segments, which are difficult to obtain on clinically-acquired EEG. Thus, we aim to devise an unsupervised method for seizure identification on EEG.MethodsWe propose the first fully-unsupervised deep learning method for seizure identification on raw EEG, using a variational autoencoder (VAE). In doing so, we train the VAE on recordings without seizures. As training captures non-seizure activity, we identify seizures with respect to the reconstruction errors at inference time. Moreover, we extend the traditional VAE training loss to suppress EEG artifacts. Our method does not require ground-truth expert labels indicating seizure segments or manual feature extraction.ResultsWe implement our method using the PyTorch library and execute experiments on an NVIDIA V100 GPU. We evaluate our method on three benchmark EEG datasets: (i) intracranial recordings from the University of Pennsylvania and the Mayo Clinic, (ii) scalp recordings from the Temple University Hospital of Philadelphia, and (iii) scalp recordings from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the Boston Children's Hospital. To assess performance, we report accuracy, precision, recall, Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve (AUC), and p-value under the Welch t-test for distinguishing seizure vs. non-seizure EEG windows. Our approach can successfully distinguish seizures from non-seizure activity, with up to 0.83 AUC on intracranial recordings. Moreover, our algorithm has the potential for real-time inference, by processing at least 10 s of EEG in a second.ConclusionWe take the first successful steps in deep learning-based unsupervised seizure identification on raw EEG. Our approach has the potential of alleviating the burden on clinical experts regarding laborsome EEG inspections for seizures. Furthermore, aiding the identification of early seizures via our method could facilitate successful detection of epilepsy development and initiate antiepileptogenic therapies.

Dataset Information

Using electronic health data to explore effectiveness of ICU EEG and anti-seizure treatment.

Objectives

Methods

Results

Interpretation

Publications

Using electronic health data to explore effectiveness of ICU EEG and anti-seizure treatment.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets