Project description:As of April 2022, the Omicron BA.1 variant of concern of SARS-CoV-2 was spreading quickly around the world and outcompeting other circulating strains. We examined its stability on various surfaces and found that this Omicron variant is more stable than its ancestral strain on smooth and porous surfaces.
Project description:Terminating the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic relies upon pan-global vaccination. Current vaccines elicit neutralizing antibody responses to the virus spike derived from early isolates. However, new strains have emerged with multiple mutations, including P.1 from Brazil, B.1.351 from South Africa, and B.1.1.7 from the UK (12, 10, and 9 changes in the spike, respectively). All have mutations in the ACE2 binding site, with P.1 and B.1.351 having a virtually identical triplet (E484K, K417N/T, and N501Y), which we show confer similar increased affinity for ACE2. We show that, surprisingly, P.1 is significantly less resistant to naturally acquired or vaccine-induced antibody responses than B.1.351, suggesting that changes outside the receptor-binding domain (RBD) impact neutralization. Monoclonal antibody (mAb) 222 neutralizes all three variants despite interacting with two of the ACE2-binding site mutations. We explain this through structural analysis and use the 222 light chain to largely restore neutralization potency to a major class of public antibodies.
Project description:BackgroundThe severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic began in 2019 but it remains as a serious threat today. To reduce and prevent spread of the virus, multiple vaccines have been developed. Despite the efforts in developing vaccines, Omicron strain of the virus has recently been designated as a variant of concern (VOC) by the World Health Organization (WHO).ObjectiveTo develop a vaccine candidate against Omicron strain (B.1.1.529, BA.1) of the SARS-CoV-19.MethodsWe applied reverse vaccinology methods for BA.1 and BA.2 as the vaccine target and a control, respectively. First, we predicted MHC I, MHC II and B cell epitopes based on their viral genome sequences. Second, after estimation of antigenicity, allergenicity and toxicity, a vaccine construct was assembled and tested for physicochemical properties and solubility. Third, AlphaFold2, RaptorX and RoseTTAfold servers were used to predict secondary structures and 3D structures of the vaccine construct. Fourth, molecular docking analysis was performed to test binding of our construct with angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). Lastly, we compared mutation profiles on the epitopes between BA.1, BA.2, and wild type to estimate the efficacy of the vaccine.ResultsWe collected a total of 10 MHC I, 9 MHC II and 5 B cell epitopes for the final vaccine construct for Omicron strain. All epitopes were predicted to be antigenic, non-allergenic and non-toxic. The construct was estimated to have proper stability and solubility. The best modelled tertiary structures were selected for molecular docking analysis with ACE2 receptor.ConclusionsThese results suggest the potential efficacy of our newly developed vaccine construct as a novel vaccine candidate against Omicron strain of the coronavirus.
Project description:Since December 2019, SARS-CoV-2 has spread quickly worldwide, leading to more than 280 million confirmed cases, including over 5,000,000 deaths. Interestingly, coronaviruses were found to subvert and hijack autophagic process to allow their viral replication. Autophagy-modulating compounds thus rapidly emerged as an attractive strategy to fight SARS-CoV-2 infection, including the well-known chloroquine (CQ). Here, we investigated the antiviral activity and associated mechanism of GNS561/Ezurpimtrostat, a small lysosomotropic molecule inhibitor of late-stage autophagy. Interestingly, GNS561 exhibited antiviral activity of 6-40 nM depending on the viral strain considered, currently positioning it as the most powerful molecule investigated in SARS-CoV-2 infection. We then showed that GNS561 was located in lysosome-associated-membrane-protein-2-positive (LAMP2-positive) lysosomes, together with SARS-CoV-2. Moreover, GNS561 increased LC3-II spot size and caused the accumulation of autophagic vacuoles and the presence of multilamellar bodies, suggesting that GNS561 disrupted the autophagy mechanism. To confirm our findings, we used the K18-hACE2 mouse model and highlighted that GNS561 treatment led to a decline in SARS-CoV-2 virions in the lungs associated with a disruption of the autophagy pathway. Overall, our study highlights GNS561 as a powerful drug in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection and supports the hypothesis that autophagy blockers could be an alternative strategy for COVID-19.